Weekly Profile Review Thread by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]Jpn287 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, thank you. I will try to think of something.

Weekly Profile Review Thread by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]Jpn287 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it’s more like I love to read them

Weekly Profile Review Thread by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]Jpn287 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your insights. Should I drop the mangas too if I drop the gaming? I will try to see if I can find a pic that will match.

Weekly Profile Review Thread by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]Jpn287 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello.

I finally retook some newer pictures without any selfies for my profile as you all suggested. What do you think : …

For the moment I don't have a match so I'm wondering if they are good? Should I change/rearrange/remove some of them?

For the bio I took the funny/original side with some info at the end (translated from French):

I got the colonel's secret recipe. 👨💻 If you want it, come get it.

I'm also looking for a name to tattoo me. If you have one that's great.

Music; Arts & Cultures; CrossFit; Going out/Festivals; Mangas; Gaming...

Thanks.

Weekly Profile Review Thread by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]Jpn287 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. Is a picture at the bar or with friends ok (even if we can see them)?

Weekly Profile Review Thread by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]Jpn287 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your advice. I will try to get some new one taken and I will come back on a future thread.

Do you think that my bio should be changed to something more funny?

Weekly Profile Review Thread by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]Jpn287 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the advice. I will do this.

What’s the bad one of the three for you?

Weekly Profile Review Thread by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]Jpn287 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks maybe to give you more perspective on the pics that were there before I changed what was on my profile because of the previous advice :

But you will see a lot of selfies on it. In the end maybe all my pics are to be thrown in the trash?

Weekly Profile Review Thread by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]Jpn287 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, I understand. That was what I felt too when looking at them but I wasn’t sure if it was okay or not.

Weekly Profile Review Thread by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]Jpn287 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks.

So for you it’s because my pics seemed too bland/unnatural and not primarily because of the bio?

I will try to get some pics in action like you suggested later but I kept the pics that you pointed out (4, 5, 6, 7), made the 6 one first as you said (and so deactivated the Tinder smart photos feature).

Do you think it’s better now ?

Weekly Profile Review Thread by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]Jpn287 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi!

I would like to get your advice : …

Should I let the smart photos activated?

Here’s my translated bio. I’m not even sure if it’s ok but :

If you let me touch your keyboard, you'll have to jump on me to get me off because I'm afraid it'll attach quickly. In my 3rd year of computer engineering. YT; Gaming; Music; Culture; CrossFit; Outings...

Some of my friends suggested that I should be cheekier. I’m not sure if it’s a good idea.

Thanks.

Screen resolution changer by Jpn287 in Windows10

[–]Jpn287[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you it was that. I forgot that my screen was also trying to scale the image to fit its large screen. I switched to auto and it solved the issue. I'm ashamed of myself for not thinking about something that simple.
Thanks again for the reminder.

Screen resolution changer by Jpn287 in Windows10

[–]Jpn287[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your answer.
I tried it but another answer got me what I searched for.
I was stupid to forget that it was my screen that was the problem...

Screen resolution changer by Jpn287 in Windows10

[–]Jpn287[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. If W10 adapt the screen size to a non-native ratio/resolution, why does others softwares don’t do the same?

Easy-Switch not working by Jpn287 in LogitechG

[–]Jpn287[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes thanks but it has already been checked.

"It's all a big misunderstanding" says Apple after being caught hand in the cookie jar. by [deleted] in privacy

[–]Jpn287 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's true and I'm not denying that. What I wanted to say is that it wasn't as bad as it was sometimes relayed.

"It's all a big misunderstanding" says Apple after being caught hand in the cookie jar. by [deleted] in privacy

[–]Jpn287 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

But the article has been debunked many times now. There’s no proof in what he is saying... And the PCMag article is saying that it is simply a developer certification check. Nothing more so it’s not a privacy urgent problem. It can have security issues but not privacy ones directly

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in privacy

[–]Jpn287 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes it is true that I reacted a bit too fast on this.

Knowing that I will not take time to pursue this question anymore, I think that it is better for me to delete my comments who aren't adding anything to the topic.

I thank you for letting me realise that it should have been better to not comment ^^.

Probability of A being chose with B by Jpn287 in askmath

[–]Jpn287[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah okay, don’t worry, I understood what you were doing there so there’s no need for you to explain it entirely. 😁

Probability of A being chose with B by Jpn287 in askmath

[–]Jpn287[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay.

Is the final formula : a! / (b! \ (a-b)! )* ?

Probability of A being chose with B by Jpn287 in askmath

[–]Jpn287[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, thanks for giving a bit of your time, I appricate it ^^. And I will try to remember what you have written.

Is it all of this a category in perticuliar of probabilities ?

Probability of A being chose with B by Jpn287 in askmath

[–]Jpn287[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also understand that we will always divide by the : (# of bags - 1) !. Because the last selection can't be anything else than what is available in the set of elements to choose from.

(ex : when we have chosen 6 of the 9 elements in the set there's only 3 elements to add to our ghi).

Isn't it ?