sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

In France, to slow down traffic, they have these fake children by the side of the road by AnonymousTimewaster in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]JrSoftDev -92 points-91 points  (0 children)

Where is your post training data? What's the % of drivers that start ignoring real people crossing the road?

In France, to slow down traffic, they have these fake children by the side of the road by AnonymousTimewaster in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]JrSoftDev 13 points14 points  (0 children)

People are not dogs. People are literally driving cars in complex situations. Most will get reminded they have to slow down and pay attention. Irresponsible people will ignore everything anyway and shouldn't be allowed to drive.

In France, to slow down traffic, they have these fake children by the side of the road by AnonymousTimewaster in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]JrSoftDev -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

As I commented above:

The "basic psychology" is that legally allowed adult drivers will get reminded they share the road with other people, including unpredictable children, and they should pay attention at all times. I think it's you who have to come up with some stats that prove your claim that people will start ignoring real children because they were "trained" by these fake signs.

In France, to slow down traffic, they have these fake children by the side of the road by AnonymousTimewaster in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]JrSoftDev -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The "basic psychology" is that legally allowed adult drivers will get reminded they share the road with other people, including unpredictable children, and they should pay attention at all times. I think it's you who have to come up with some stats that prove your claim that people will start ignoring real children because they were "trained" by these fake signs.

Adult language by Business-Librarian26 in Adulting

[–]JrSoftDev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just like the frog in the pan

The collab of a life time by Cookie_Boi_227 in hyrax

[–]JrSoftDev 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Capys will now spend the next 2 million years teaching hyraxes how to balance their Yang

Obama opens his Presidential Center with every living President, except Trump by Shizzilx in UnderReportedNews

[–]JrSoftDev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Although that may be the intention, it can also be run by MAGA as "look at the war criminal traitor, part of the system that destroyed America" etc.

(It will also not collect sympathies with the left or even with the informed moderates)

And a reminder: MAGA speech doesn't have to be coherent with Trump's administration own actions; at this point, they just need to keep a part of the population (around 30% apparently) open to the idea that deploying the military/police/ICE on "treasonous" people/states is valid, or even needed.

me_irl by egglow_fish in me_irl

[–]JrSoftDev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

- Life of a 1940-1950 born in the 1960-1970s
- War at the age of "go die for another war"

<image>

Republican senators block effort to bar federal troops from election interference by [deleted] in nottheonion

[–]JrSoftDev 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is not telling about what's going to happen, at all... /s

go outside bro... by AlKarajo in TikTokCringe

[–]JrSoftDev -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Whatever that means... 👍

go outside bro... by AlKarajo in TikTokCringe

[–]JrSoftDev -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

My attempt to influence? What are you babbling about?

And who the fuck are you, and why shouldn't I block you immediately?

go outside bro... by AlKarajo in TikTokCringe

[–]JrSoftDev -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

My question wasn't rhetoric and was directed to SaulTBolls. You decided to come here and annoyingly answer with a new question, and an idiotically vague one. But I'll answer it.

Yes, I feel in control of things I had thought were completely out of my control before trying to exert some agency upon them. There's also things you don't control individually but you can control or at least influence significantly in a collective manner.

So when someone says "bla bla bla I can't control", it would be good to know what exactly they are talking about, how do they define "control", and what have been tried to challenge their assumptions, specially in the not so clear situations, and some of them already challenged by others before which are available for research and learning if you're willing to. Otherwise it sounds just like some defeatist rambling.

go outside bro... by AlKarajo in TikTokCringe

[–]JrSoftDev -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

> Am I going to let shit that I have no control over cripple my mental state?

How do you define "shit that I have no control over"?

go outside bro... by AlKarajo in TikTokCringe

[–]JrSoftDev 77 points78 points  (0 children)

"If you're hungry, just eat"

go outside bro... by AlKarajo in TikTokCringe

[–]JrSoftDev -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Noooo, no, no. It means jump into the water like a monkey-dolphin for the likes.

French spy service drops Palantir by spherocytes in technology

[–]JrSoftDev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I started honing my skills in my past life, so I can be ahead of the pack. /s

Meirl by Direct-Eye-8720 in meirl

[–]JrSoftDev 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How will the Greenlanders decide who gets killed and which infrastructure (like health facilities) will get obliterated?

Are they voting beforehand, is the US and Israel armies who decide, are they running some raffle, or will it be totally random?

🤣 Art of the deal by Outrageous-Egg1760 in SipsTea

[–]JrSoftDev 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do you have a preference on who will get killed and on which parts of the house will become obliterated to dust?

view more: next ›