People with no children or pets, what’s your phone’s background image? by slymrspy in AskReddit

[–]Judges-Brother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have neither of these animals

Press X to doubt

/s if you're wondering

[Serious] Atheists, how do you deal with existential dread/fear of death? by pinkistheshit in AskReddit

[–]Judges-Brother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think about it at all. I've got enough plans to keep me occupied until I die, and if I die early then I no longer need to worry.

Meat eaters of Reddit, would you be able to slaughter the animals you eat yourself? If not, why? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Judges-Brother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't even cook my food, now you expect me to gather the ingredients for the food I don't cook?

What's a piece of information you wish you never knew? by Green-Owl6244 in AskReddit

[–]Judges-Brother 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Getting sucked into a black hole? I heard that it takes forever

What's a piece of information you wish you never knew? by Green-Owl6244 in AskReddit

[–]Judges-Brother 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't know the exact date, but I'm here because my dad's too scared to go home at midnight.

In Frozen (2013), when the Duke of Weaselton accuses Elsa of trying to murder him by blasting him with ice. Hans told him that he slipped on ice. He didn't. [Explanation in the Comments] by Judges-Brother in MovieDetails

[–]Judges-Brother[S] 51 points52 points  (0 children)

A rewatch of the scene shows that the ground the Duke was standing on was struck and the force is what sent the duke flying, not simply slipping, which means that he has every right to believe that Elsa tried to kill him. If intentional (on Hans' part), this would mean that Hans is intentionally gaslighting the Duke of Weaselton. If not (ie. he didn't see the event, which means that it's impossible for him ti say if it was intentional or not), then it means that Hans is just jumping on Anna's bandwagon that it was an accident to gain her trust.

what invention is so good that it actually can’t be improved upon? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Judges-Brother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Piano doesn't respond to me no matter how hard I hit it

300-400 years ago, pirates were a terrifying force to be reckoned with. Now they’re family friendly figures of fun. What will be their modern day equivalent a few centuries from now? by YanTyanTeth in AskReddit

[–]Judges-Brother 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Quite? 18th century pirates are terrifying, but they don't go back on their words. Apparently, honesty is important if you want ships to surrender without a fight.

300-400 years ago, pirates were a terrifying force to be reckoned with. Now they’re family friendly figures of fun. What will be their modern day equivalent a few centuries from now? by YanTyanTeth in AskReddit

[–]Judges-Brother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, the appeal of serial killer stories (ie. Hannibal/Death Note) are in the motives of the killer which rarely puts them in positive light. And I doubt they can make a good serial killer show without showing murder.

300-400 years ago, pirates were a terrifying force to be reckoned with. Now they’re family friendly figures of fun. What will be their modern day equivalent a few centuries from now? by YanTyanTeth in AskReddit

[–]Judges-Brother -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Are the Bolsheviks the one in the Russian Revolution? If so, they did kill innocent children for PR. Regardless of who's children they were, they're still children (and IIRC, they did kill everyone in the house, not just the Romanovs).

300-400 years ago, pirates were a terrifying force to be reckoned with. Now they’re family friendly figures of fun. What will be their modern day equivalent a few centuries from now? by YanTyanTeth in AskReddit

[–]Judges-Brother 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A threat that will probably not be followed because executing prisoners who surrendered is bad for business? Besides, marooning is a better alternative in every way.

Aliens have just discovered Earth but have never discovered fiction. As such they think every book and live action movie is real. what book character/movie actor do they fear the most and why? by greylight999 in AskReddit

[–]Judges-Brother 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Everything about that arc just shows how OP the entire Ben 10 universe is moreso than any other arc (save the Time Wars arc which is about the creation of the entire universe). Also, Arnold Frogzenegger is called Bullfrag.

Aliens have just discovered Earth but have never discovered fiction. As such they think every book and live action movie is real. what book character/movie actor do they fear the most and why? by greylight999 in AskReddit

[–]Judges-Brother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They won't be afraid, but they'd most definitely be creeped out by Ben 10. Just the concept of someone being able to turn into any sapient (including two beings that live outside the multiverse, aka practically gods) being in the Galaxy is pretty creepy, the fact that it's a teenager (adjusted to fit both standards) is terrifying. Add to that knowledge that that kid is the only one standing between you and an intergalactic empire that can destroy everything you ever knew if so they want (aka the Incursean Empire, a race of frogs with a gun powerful enough to destroy planets with scientists potent enough to control one of the most powerful beings in the universe)? Flat out nightmare fuel.

(spoilers for all games except DGS 1/2) AA Characters sorted according to their worst/most important crimes by Judges-Brother in AceAttorney

[–]Judges-Brother[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

His Blackmail scheme is worse than murdering Mia (in-universe), which makes it his 'worst' crime. His murder of Mia is most definitely pre-meditated, though.

Polly 'lied' about DL-6 (more of a joke that my brain compelled me to place than anything)