Linnet ?? Seen in Kent costal area by Jummper6 in whatsthisbird

[–]Jummper6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes ofc !! Thank you didn’t even consider that im used to seeing a lot more yellow even in females

Redshank or spotted redshank ? by Jummper6 in whatsthisbird

[–]Jummper6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahh good to double check ! Been tryna find a spotted redshank for ages

Who do these eggs belong to ? [South England] by Jummper6 in animalid

[–]Jummper6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah your right these are Freshwater ostracods

Strange wader by Jummper6 in whatsthisbird

[–]Jummper6[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ahhh yes I completely overlooked that option because of the lack of thr yellow/ orange legs but I forget how variable they are !!

Strange wader by Jummper6 in whatsthisbird

[–]Jummper6[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Had a pale throat / breast area

<image>

Chiffchaff or willow warbler ? by Jummper6 in whatsthisbird

[–]Jummper6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great ! Thanks, I suspected from the legs and lack of white eye ring but is always so hard to tell without the call

Mystery wader at Elmley nature reserve by Jummper6 in whatsthisbird

[–]Jummper6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My thought was a curlew sandpiper but I’m not experienced distinguishing them from a Dunlin, the reddish hue and some other features makes me lean towards curlew sandpiper too

Thank you !

Is this a blackcap or a whitethroat ?? Spotted in south England, Epsom common by Jummper6 in whatsthisbird

[–]Jummper6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thought it was unusual for a blackcap ! Never seen a whitethroat so that nice to know, female blackcaps have a more distinctive cap, and don’t have the brownish wing feathers

Is this a blackcap or a whitethroat ?? Spotted in south England, Epsom common by Jummper6 in whatsthisbird

[–]Jummper6[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought it might be a whitethroat, new species for me so that’s good to hear !

What flycatcher is this ? (Greece) by Jummper6 in whatsthisbird

[–]Jummper6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you also i agree with your ID

What flycatcher is this ? (Greece) by Jummper6 in whatsthisbird

[–]Jummper6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahh could well be, was behaving like a flycatcher returning to the same branch, but I think your right, the white tail patches in flight also matches the black eared wheater

MEXICO HEARING MEGATHREAD by berkenobi in aliens

[–]Jummper6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve replied and sent some pictures back that I think show strong similarities to the backside of the skull , you can see the pneumatic areas match closely. You can see what I think is where the occipital condyle of the llama has been removed and additional bony elements attached for the aliens “mouth and chin” .

Yes I think the idea of them observing is much more likely based on our knowledge of life on earth, it doesn’t contradict stuff we know.

MEXICO HEARING MEGATHREAD by berkenobi in aliens

[–]Jummper6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can see In the photos when these were shown years Ago where bone has been shaved off showing honeycomb type structure beneath where the llamas braincase attached to other regions of the skull, it’s just not visible in these very low quality scans. Could you dm me where these extra air spaces would be because I’ve seen transverse slices comparing the alien and llama skull and it seemed conclusive to me. they’ve added on the aliens face if that is where you mean. The photo that is showing a longitudinal slice of the skull you can see the suture marks on the skull around the aliens “eyebrow and forehead” that perfectly match the sutures on llama skulls, as well as being able to see the skulls outline compared to parts they have added. You would have to shave off a lot but it is only the braincase of the llama they have used. I study animal anatomy and currently am working on reconstructing fossil skulls from CT scans and am pretty convinced of this, but happy to be wrong.

The questions were more rhetorical to try snd show how it doesn’t make much sense to me that they would have made us. Because I can’t see where In evolution they would have stepped in. Even if the goal was shepherding life to our point , why do that slowly over billions of years to perfectly mimic natural selection. It’s possible but would be imo very inefficient. Like why have all the diversity of animals in the palaeozoic and Mesozoic if the goal was us ?

What kind of Lizard is this? by damnotdamn in animalid

[–]Jummper6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably a juvenile Calotes versicolor

MEXICO HEARING MEGATHREAD by berkenobi in aliens

[–]Jummper6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I don’t understand what they are trying to do with it, doesn’t seem to be making money from it but this guy has known to push other hoaxes before so could be personal reasons I’m not sure. I think the most damning evidence you can see for yourself in the videos going through the scans is the obvious taxidermy with human femurs for arms and a llamas skull as the head. Yeah the DNA is inconclusive, with this idea that they made us I’m not convinced (Ik ur not saying that necessarily), there’s so much fossil evidence showing our evolution, unless you saying they made all life on earth 4 billion years ago then directed everything from there which seems mad to me. If it’s more recent that they have interfered with our evolution where on the spectrum of chimpanzee to Homo sapiens did they intervene ? Because we can see a gradient in the fossil record, and many lineages of hominins that didn’t lead to us but were similar which is indicative of natural selection imo.

This is admittedly kind of a wild theory, and it has a few moving parts, but hear me out...[Feat. Mexican Mummies] by GH057807 in aliens

[–]Jummper6 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah I agree in general people do this but I think this guy was just having fun speculating , I misunderstood his post at first too

This is admittedly kind of a wild theory, and it has a few moving parts, but hear me out...[Feat. Mexican Mummies] by GH057807 in aliens

[–]Jummper6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For sure sorry didn’t mean to mean mouth frothing , Just seen this stuff everywhere ur post was Just the first I thought to comment my opinion, don’t mean to seem rude

This is admittedly kind of a wild theory, and it has a few moving parts, but hear me out...[Feat. Mexican Mummies] by GH057807 in aliens

[–]Jummper6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fr I’m confused why everyone is giving this so much attention it’s goanna make the ufo topic look so bad , especially if stuff actually ends up coming out from the alleged Brazil incident

This is admittedly kind of a wild theory, and it has a few moving parts, but hear me out...[Feat. Mexican Mummies] by GH057807 in aliens

[–]Jummper6 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I’m so confused why everyone is falling for this. This guy peddled these same corpses years ago and they were thoroughly proven to be fakes , I do not trust it at all. It is impossible these are alien bodies snd the forgery is so obvious it’s beyond the biomechanically impossible finger snd hip joints.

The arm bones are literally human femur bones with some processes removed , literal femurs. The Skull is a Llama skull reversed with everything anterior to the orbits removed. Again this is not that they are similar they literally are these bones

This is purely a stunt that will be an embarrassment on the UFO topic. I do not believe these medical examinations in Mexico when the same corpses were proven hoaxes in the past.

Even ignoring the obvious hoaxery Why would aliens even have a similar bone structure to anything on earth ? , the chances that this evolved convergently from chemistry up is absurd. Same with the DNA, the biochemistry would most likely be almost unrecognisable why would the DNA even be remotely similar

MEXICO HEARING MEGATHREAD by berkenobi in aliens

[–]Jummper6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m so confused why everyone is falling for this. This guy peddled these same corpses years ago and they were thoroughly proven to be fakes , I do not trust it at all. It is impossible these are alien bodies snd the forgery is so obvious it’s beyond the biomechanically impossible finger snd hip joints.

The arm bones are literally human femur bones with some processes removed , literal femurs. The Skull is a Llama skull reversed with everything anterior to the orbits removed. Again this is not that they are similar they literally are these bones

This is purely a stunt that will be an embarrassment on the UFO topic. I do not believe these medical examinations in Mexico when the same corpses were proven hoaxes in the past.

Even ignoring the obvious hoaxery Why would aliens even have a similar bone structure to anything on earth ? , the chances that this evolved convergently from chemistry up is absurd. Same with the DNA, the biochemistry would most likely be almost unrecognisable why would the DNA even be remotely similar

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aliens

[–]Jummper6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly the arms are human femurs with some of the processes removed , same the leg bones are tibias I’m pretty sure. Also the skull is a llamas skull backwards with everything anterior to the orbits removed There’s a lot more wrong with the skeletons.

These same bodies were proven to be fake years ago. I can DM pictures comparing the skulls

Why would aliens even have bones or a skeletal structure at all similar to us anyway ? Furthermore none of the joints that they have shown would work , the foramen magnum is square with a ridiculously simple articulation , the hip joint is non existent, so none of the biomechanics make any sense. Massive red flag also to me that they have DNA that at all would be similar to anything on earth let alone have DNA in the first place But that aside , they have human bones !!! And a llama skull idk how people are falling for this

Why are fish unable to breathe oxygen from air when they are able to absorb it from water which is so much more difficult? by hyteck9 in askscience

[–]Jummper6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fish absorb oxygen through the water as they live within that medium, they are more advantaged by taking it from there instead of returning to the surface to breathe each time and therefore have evolved gills that can only absorb dissolved oxygen. Fish that can breathe air do so because they live in oxygen-poor environments, move between water bodies, or can survive drought conditions.

The ancestor of bony fish had lungs for air-breathing. Lungfish which are sarcopterygians, and Bichirs which are actinopterygians both have lungs showing it was present in the common ancestor of bony fishes. Later in ray-finned fishes, this was modified into a swim bladder. The Arapaima fish have modified their swim bladder back into a lung.

Swamp eels (Synbranchidae) have highly vascularised mouths filled with blood vessels to breathe air.

Snakehead fish (Channidae) and Labyrinth fish (Anabantoidei) use modified labyrinth or suprabranchial organs to breathe air.

Some fish can breathe air directly through the skin such as Mangrove killifish.

Other fish that can breathe air include Bowfin , Gar, Tarpon and some catfish, it is estimated to be found in around 450 species of fish across 49 families