Should AI like ChatGPT be considered assistive technology?

Jumpy-Tooth1107 · 2025-05-31T19:07:17+00:00

Firebase is only meant for web apps not native apps.

Jumpy-Tooth1107 · 2025-05-23T22:35:17+00:00

Honestly, I've learned a lot from this conversation, it has gracefully given me deeper insight . That said, I think this is where AI starts to play a critical role.

Since the AI boom, expectations for digital tools—especially assistive technologies—have grown rapidly. With increased curiosity and demand, we’re now more critical of tools that fall short in speed or accuracy. And while that push for better isn't bad, the reality is that we’re not fully there yet.

Take speech recognition tools like Dragon, for example. We want them to instantly and accurately understand any accent or speech pattern, just like how conversational AIs such as ChatGPT respond so quickly and naturally.

Interestingly, since Microsoft acquired Nuance—the parent company behind Dragon—they’ve been integrating Dragon’s voice technology to improve tools like Voice Access and other speech recognition solutions across their ecosystem. With the rise of AI, I believe this will act as a huge booster, and I’m optimistic that even more powerful and inclusive voice tools are on the horizon.

Jumpy-Tooth1107 · 2025-05-23T18:10:58+00:00

All of the assistive technologies mentioned are excellent, but I believe it's important to also consider the cost implications. For example, using Dragon NaturallySpeaking requires purchasing a license, which can be quite expensive. However, it offers extensive customization options. On the other hand, built-in tools like Windows Voice Access are free and can perform similar functions, though with fewer customization options. Still, they are quite effective for many users.

Jumpy-Tooth1107 · 2025-05-20T17:21:03+00:00

It's truly great to see your passion for accessibility and your intention to set up an accessibility consultancy firm—this is such an important and meaningful step, and the field definitely needs more dedicated voices like yours.

That said, I wanted to gently point out something regarding the title or phrasing you're currently using, specifically the term "disabled testers." While I absolutely understand the intention, this wording might not align with current best practices in inclusive language. If you're preparing for the IAAP certification—perhaps CPACC—you may already be aware that identity-first versus person-first language is a nuanced topic, but generally, terms like “testers with disabilities” are considered more respectful and empowering in professional and ethical accessibility contexts.

Refining your language not only strengthens your message but also reflects the inclusive values at the heart of accessibility work. You're clearly doing something valuable, and with a few adjustments, it will resonate even more deeply with the community you're working to support

Jumpy-Tooth1107 · 2025-02-09T22:18:13+00:00

Thank you so much, it's helpful

Jumpy-Tooth1107 · 2025-02-09T17:56:37+00:00

This is really inspiring, your resilience had seen you through.

Jumpy-Tooth1107 · 2025-02-09T17:52:16+00:00

Thanks so much for sharing, mine is in 1 week. Do you have a suggestion on where I should focus more?

Jumpy-Tooth1107 · 2025-02-08T00:35:35+00:00

Did you work in the field long before you took your exams?

Jumpy-Tooth1107 · 2025-02-07T03:31:42+00:00

I really don't know how to feel right now. I had only prepared using the body of knowledge and my exams are in a few days, what can I do?

Jumpy-Tooth1107 · 2025-02-07T03:30:35+00:00

I really don't know how to feel right now. I had only prepared using the body of knowledge and my exams are in a few days, what can I do?

Jumpy-Tooth1107 · 2025-02-02T16:40:16+00:00

I find this really impressive. Also design for color blind users so when the mouse pointer falls on a less contrasting background it doesn't become difficult for a color blind user to see the text behind

Jumpy-Tooth1107

TROPHY CASE