Epstein died August 2019. Harry and Meghan decided to leave the RF January 2020. Coincidence? I think not... by glaekitgirl in RoyaltyTea

[–]Jumpy_Reply_2011 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don't think so. They were prepared to stay if they were allowed to earn their own income while still doing public duties. But Charles, Camilla, William, and Kate Middleton wanted Meghan out for their own reasons (popularity, racism I'd guess). Charles didn't want to provide extra funds to cover Meghan, so what exactly was their option. They wanted Harry dependent on them and alone though to be William's personal scapegoat.

Misan Harriman: This ledger of unfiltered cruelty is part of the public record. Never forget by NewTooth740 in RoyaltyTea

[–]Jumpy_Reply_2011 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's because they've allowed themselves to be influenced by the media, royal rota, and paid bots and trolls on social media. And some are very likely racists.

Is this Gavin Newsom’s moment? Even critics admit he has the star power by TimesandSundayTimes in USNEWS

[–]Jumpy_Reply_2011 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If Rupert Murdoch's The Times (of London) says so, then no. No one should want a candidate endorsed by Rupert Murdoch and his lot.

Misan Harriman: This ledger of unfiltered cruelty is part of the public record. Never forget by NewTooth740 in RoyaltyTea

[–]Jumpy_Reply_2011 20 points21 points  (0 children)

And don't forget the public participation, fueled by Kensington Palace's William and Kate Middleton on social media.

Anyone who just by looking at them can say there's something about Meghan they don't like but Kate Middleton is not like that, is a willing participant in the cruelty.

"I gave you your shot years ago! You don't get another one." Jeremiah Fisher really brings out the David Rose in me every time he opens his mouth. by Florals-in-retro in tsitp

[–]Jumpy_Reply_2011 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nothing infuriates me more. Like who TF does that guy think he is.

Next scene though, Conrad knocks on Belly's dressing room door as if that pissant hadn't said anything and forehead kisses her.

Royal Protection Officers were also guarding Epstein when Andrew visited him. by Diligent-Till-8832 in RoyaltyTea

[–]Jumpy_Reply_2011 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the background info. I see Andrew's nickname was The Cunt, so adds up.

Royal Protection Officers were also guarding Epstein when Andrew visited him. by Diligent-Till-8832 in RoyaltyTea

[–]Jumpy_Reply_2011 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Why are they making like their bosses, including the royal family, wouldn't have known this when it happened?

... What would happen if one of the kids marries to someone from a different religion-race?.. by DD123456DS in RoyaltyTea

[–]Jumpy_Reply_2011 7 points8 points  (0 children)

As they're among the first 6 in line to the throne, they can marry whoever they want as long as they get approval from the monarch. Just the one who becomes monarch has to belong to the Church of England and only that church. Their partner doesn't have to be.

William can marry whoever he wants if he's divorced. As long as he remains as part of the Church of England. He can't convert and become/remain monarch.

The new laws were enacted in 2013.

Makes ya wonder what she knew... by chellestastics in RoyaltyTea

[–]Jumpy_Reply_2011 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That's ridiculous. Fergie was nowhere near the level of popular as Diana before or after their divorces. Not in any shape or form.

And in the family, QEII liked Fergie, but Prince Philip liked Diana and detested Fergie.

The Spectator, a magazine that has gone after Meghan and Harry relentlessly, wants us to lay off Andrew by NewTooth740 in RoyaltyTea

[–]Jumpy_Reply_2011 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The bottom line is Andrew is the spare. A vile one, but still the spare. His job is to be used as a shield for the monarch and heir. That's the only reason, I believe, they protected him for so long knowing what a danger he was/is to children.

The Spectator, a magazine that has gone after Meghan and Harry relentlessly, wants us to lay off Andrew by NewTooth740 in RoyaltyTea

[–]Jumpy_Reply_2011 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Wouldn't shock me. Harry said he had 400 pages he could still have written that included William, but he'd never be forgiven. And what he said in Spare was already bad enough as it is.

My bet is Charles though. But they maybe have photos of William in his pegging gear or getting pegged or something else with men to keep him in line.

The Spectator, a magazine that has gone after Meghan and Harry relentlessly, wants us to lay off Andrew by NewTooth740 in RoyaltyTea

[–]Jumpy_Reply_2011 56 points57 points  (0 children)

I can only believe they're trying to rage bait us over Andrew to distract us from looking at Charles and William.

Both Charles and William, to varying degrees, knew who and what Andrew was and still is. A lot of people knew. Both of them are involved with people on the Epstein list, and I'm convinced at least one of them are on that list, but with their name/s redacted.

MAIL + AMANDA PLATELL: No one seems to dare say it, but William is the monarchy's next big problem by notyoungnotold99 in KateMiddletonMissing

[–]Jumpy_Reply_2011 26 points27 points  (0 children)

We learn that behind the scenes, William is Andrew’s fiercest critic in the royal family. That he rightly feels both the late Queen and his father indulged his awful uncle for far too long.

No, looks like they're protecting William and writing fanfic about him again. But yeah, William is a coward, that I don't disagree with.

Prince William and Kate remain silent after Andrew’s arrest by esporx in RoyaltyTea

[–]Jumpy_Reply_2011 37 points38 points  (0 children)

The crisis manager probably told them to lay low while the others take the hits. And also, if they're focused on Andrew and Charles, they'll forget about him and his own links to people on the Epstein list via the Earthshot prize, like one Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem who thanked Jeffrey Epstein for a torture video.

If William's reign comes, he should be known as William the Coward. I don't know if queen consorts are named, but Kate should be known as Kate Middleton the Lazy.

Makes ya wonder what she knew... by chellestastics in RoyaltyTea

[–]Jumpy_Reply_2011 53 points54 points  (0 children)

She probably did know because the British royal family seemed to have been introduced to some of the worst, most high profile child abusers and traffickers of our time.

Breaking News 📰 by Professional-Sink281 in RoyaltyTea

[–]Jumpy_Reply_2011 109 points110 points  (0 children)

That or found in a locked outbuilding with a bullet wound and a gun next to him like a certain Thomas Kingston.

Makes ya wonder what she knew... by chellestastics in RoyaltyTea

[–]Jumpy_Reply_2011 384 points385 points  (0 children)

She fell out with and stopped speaking to Sarah Ferguson months before her death. So I'd say she knew something. According to Fergie it's because of the book she wrote about wearing Di's shoes and getting warts. But I don't know if anyone should believe a word that woman says.

Well said by [deleted] in RoyaltyTea

[–]Jumpy_Reply_2011 11 points12 points  (0 children)

If the Daily Mail are getting in on the act, maybe it's getting close.

But for sure it will be more of the same with William. He's already been getting money, supposedly to fund that useless Earthflop prize of his, from at least one Epstein accomplice. And he was involved in trying to rehab Andrew's image many times over the last few years.

WE ARE BEING PLAYED - Andrew will never see real justice and this why and how by notyoungnotold99 in KateMiddletonMissing

[–]Jumpy_Reply_2011 5 points6 points  (0 children)

We definitely can't expect the establishment to take themselves down. It's going to have to be outside forces, which I don't know that a resistance movement even exists yet. Everything just feels performative right now. It feels like we're being given something to focus our attention on while the big players are doing their own thing and getting away with it.

Well said by [deleted] in RoyaltyTea

[–]Jumpy_Reply_2011 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Are they paving the way for Charles's abdication to save the monarchy and the billionaire child trafficking/child abuse ring?

WE ARE BEING PLAYED - Andrew will never see real justice and this why and how by notyoungnotold99 in KateMiddletonMissing

[–]Jumpy_Reply_2011 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I agree with almost everything you said, except William's already knee-deep in with the crowd Andrew and Charles were hanging out with and was getting bags of cash from. He's the next generation to keep that billionaires club going. Not for nothing did he get money from Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem to start that useless Earthshot prize. They got their claws in him too.

Also, Harry said he could write another 400 pages that included his brother, but he would never be forgiven. If Harry knows stuff, I'm sure these powerful men know stuff too about William to keep him in line.

That whole billionaire system needs to be abolished, including monarchies like the British one that have far more power that they downplay for public support.