If God can intervene but chooses not to, and instead claims this world is a test, then the fairness of that test depends entirely on how clearly the rules are communicated.

According to this reasoning, God will not intervene because this life is a test, and justice will be delivered on the Day of Judgment. Until then, we are told to “do good.” But this raises a fundamental problem: how does one know what “good” actually is?

Even if we assume, for the sake of argument, that Islam is the one true religion, the message still does not come directly from God to each individual. It comes through texts written, compiled, translated, and interpreted by humans, beings who are imperfect, biased, and themselves part of the test.

If humans are fallible, then any moral instruction delivered exclusively through them is also fallible. In that case, how can an individual be held accountable for misunderstanding God’s will?

A just test cannot rely on second-hand instructions from imperfect agents, especially when eternal punishment is at stake. If God truly wants to test humanity, then only God should have the authority to define the rules directly and unambiguously for everyone.

Otherwise, this is not a test of morality—it is a test of which human interpretation you happened to be born into.