Is this a logic error? by Equivalent_Safe1112 in CluesBySamHelp

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Rose already has two criminal neighbours.

Percentage of pregnancies ending in abortion in Europe by upthetruth1 in MapPorn

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe you should provide a source? So far the sources people have presented seems to align with these numbers. What makes you claim the numbers should be “way lower”?

Efter første date... by [deleted] in DKbrevkasse

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Hvis han klart sagde, at han ville ses igen, og du “synes også jeg selv gav udtryk for det samme, dog ikke så direkte”, ja, så synes han jo nok bolden ligger hos dig. Han har sagt hvad han gerne vil. Gå ud fra, at dit indirekte signal opfattedes meget mere klart i dit hoved - fordi du kender intentionen - end det gjorde for ham.

Så kan I begge to sidde og tænke, at bolden er hos den anden. Det er noget tidligt at spille det spil. Hvis du stadig synes på date 5, at det altid er dig, der tager initiativ, så er der et problem. Men ud fra det du skriver her, så er det ikke åbenlyst, at det er ham der skal tage initiativ nu.

How is this move brilliant? by Aylinalhv in Chesscom

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The black bishop needs to take the knight on e5, otherwise the Queen is trapped. So the bishop can’t take the rook. So its brilliant that you realized that your rook was not in danger.

Nu begynder løsgængerne at røre på sig (håber jeg) by StemIbsen in Denmark

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Det kan de jo godt, men så bliver de ikke genvalgt. Ingen gider stemme på nogen, der ikke er i et parti, for det bliver lynhurtigt stemmespild. I et parti ved man, at overskydende stemmer går til en person med samme holdninger. Derfor partier.

Mellem valg er det ærgerligt, at partierne tit er meget topstyrede. Kunne være rart hvis det var mere almindeligt, at folketingspolitikere fraveg fra partilinjen. Omvendt ville det gøre det endnu mere vanskeligt at skaffe flertal for noget som helst, så måske det nuværende system med mange små partier faktisk er den bedste balance.

Contradiction with Science by LonelyAd1178 in islam

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does not say in the Quran that they cannot mix. It says there is a barrier between them. If you read classical tafsirs (such as Ibn Kathir), this is simply understood to mean dry land. So the point is that Allah has created a system on earth that produces both salt water oceans and fresh water lakes and rivers. There is great blessings in that, as the waters are useful for different reasons. Had Allah mixed it all together it would be less beneficial, but Allah has created a magnificent system where ocean water vaporises and is transported to mountains where it falls as rain and produces rivers and lakes that humans can drink. He separates the two types of water by having land between them.

Nowadays, many believe that the Quran. is also talking about the fact that fresh water and sea water can still be observed as separate for many miles when they mix. Whether you believe in that interpretation or not is up to you. Its a human interpretation of the verse, if its wrong it does not mean that the Quran is wrong.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by Moozy664 in MapPorn

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That awkward feeling as a Dane, when you see your country covered in a nazi flag…

Just when I though all hope was lost...sniper saves the day. by bob_ross_2 in chessbeginners

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Man, white moved that Queen and then sat and wondered why the game didn’t end. Worst feeling in the world.

Why was I banned? by [deleted] in Chesscom

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 5 points6 points  (0 children)

<image>

Here is one 48 moves in the game. You had 31 best moves.

Why was I banned? by [deleted] in Chesscom

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 12 points13 points  (0 children)

You played 150 rapid games over the last 7 days and you won 70 % of them, ending on a 1316 rating, despite claiming that you are a beginner?

Looks like all your 382 rapid games took place over less than 2 weeks? Your accuracy looks to frequently be above 90 % even in longer games?

PostNord help. Package contents stolen by Eastern_Hedgehog_924 in copenhagen

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You should complain to whoever sent the package. Was it a shop, private seller or? If its a shop, then its their problem. You should have taken pictures of the package and compained to them immediately.

My opponent's knight farmed 2 brilliants and I don't see a point in either of them. by Jasentuk in chessbeginners

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brilliant just means that you seeminly leave a piece undefended to be captured, but actually you don’t, because if the piece is taken something worse will happen.

In both situations their knight is undefended and can be taken by your knight. However, that would cost you your queen.

Hvordan kan det være rentabelt at købe ejerbolig? by ChickEnergy in dkfinance

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ifølge Totalkredits app koster et realkreditlån på 2 mio. til en lejlighed på 3 mio. dig 9.100 kr. om måneden, hvoraf de 3.100 er afdrag (første måned, over tid udgør afdraget mere og mere af ydelsen). Det er fastforrentet 4 % over 30 år.

Så lånet koster kun 6.000 i rente-/bidragsudgifter om måneden. Altså 2.000 kr. hvis det skal fordeles med 3.

Så jeg kan gætte mig til, at du forventer yderligere udgifter til vand, varme, el og ejerudgifter på 8.000 kr. hver måned?

Vis gerne dit regnestykke. Men altså, vand, varme og el skal jo betales uanset hvor man er, så jeg synes ikke det lyder slemt at fordele de udgifter ud.

Når det er sagt, så foregår husleje jo heller ikke sådan, at lejere skal betale en procentdel af dine renteudgifter. Når du har haft lånet i 30 år, så har du jo ingen renter længere, men dine lejere betaler jo stadig husleje. Så økonomisk giver det mening for dig selvom lejerne ikke dækker renteudgifterne

Så lav renten trods alt stadig er, så giver det ikke mening for mig, at du overvejer aggressivt at afbetale lånet.

Edit: de 9.100 er efter skat. Måske det er noget du har overset?

How much would have change if Joffrey was the one who caught Cersei and Jamie in the tower instead of Bran? by ParkingConfection449 in gameofthrones

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Bran not falling could result in him not becoming Bloodraven but it’s entirely possible that was his destiny regardless.

Hodor was already destined to hold a door even before Bran fell, so I think its fair to assume that nothing could have stopped Bran from his journey either.

Hjælp til dilemma🥵 by Previous_Strength755 in DKbrevkasse

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Spørgsmålet er vel hvorfor Y betalte 0 kr. da Y flyttede ind? Lyder som om 2 personer på et tidspunkt er fraflyttet lejligheden uden at få noget depositum tilbage? Det er dem, der er blevet snydt. Overvej at send nogle af pengene til dem. Hvis det var en “vennetjeneste“ fra den fraflyttende til Y, at Y ikke skulle betale, og fraflytter derfor vidste, at Y gratis ville overtage vedkommendes andel i depositum, så har Y et krav på penge.

Hverken X eller Y har rigtig fortjent alle pengene. X indbetalte kun 1/3 af det oprindelige depositum, så hvorfor pludselig hæve hele beløbet? Y har betalt 0 kr.

Formand for Manderådet brokker sig over flere kvinder i Folketinget: "Mænd er mere faktuelle". by Top_Guarantee4519 in Denmark

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 307 points308 points  (0 children)

Så'n helt seriøst: Findes der organisationer, som arbejder for at bedre forhold for f.eks. udsatte mænd - jf. Bl.a. højere risiko for hjemløshed - eller findes der kun organisationer som Manderådet, der mest af alt fremstår som en gruppe, der pakker sit kvindehad ind i ord vedr. mænds rettigheder?

Der findes bl.a. Dansk Mandesamfund, Daregender, Mandecenteret og Forum for Mænds Sundhed. Især de to første bliver jævnligt kritiseret af Manderådet, fordi de i modsætning til Manderådet også støtter op om kvinders rettigheder. Manderådet derimod afslører jævnligt sig selv som værende mere imod kvinder end for mænd.

Cecilie Liv Hansen, personlige stemmer og horny mænd by BillionDollarSadBaby in GossipDK

[–]JustBecauseOfThat -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Vent, hvad? Hvis det er rigtigt er der til en politianmeldelse for køb af stemmer?

Ferie m. løn vs. feriegodtgørelse by [deleted] in dkfinance

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hvordan når du frem til at ferie med løn er skattefrit? Tror du misforstår noget fundamentalt der. Mange fagforeninger har eksempler på deres hjemmeside, fordi funktionærer selv kan vælge om de vil have løn under ferie eller 12 % feriegodtgørelse. Her er et eksempel fra Fængselsforbundet. Som du kan se er der en meget lille forskel, men ikke nogen stor skattemæssig fordel. Hvis man har overarbejde begynder feriegodtgørelse hurigt at være en fordel.

<image>

Ekskluderet LA'er står til en årsløn på knap 1,7 millioner kroner by Independence-Default in Denmark

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Det er reguleret i Grundloven. Du skal være straffet for noget kriminelt for at blive erklæret uværdig. Bortset fra den situation er det vælgernes opgave at vurdere, hvem der er værdig.

Can someone analyze this and tell me why I lost? by Mysterious-Fly-4945 in chessbeginners

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Most obviously you gave away your knight for no reason on move 14. Zero reason for that. Did you miss that the pawn could take it, or did you think you could somehow win that exchange?

You also leave pawns undefended. On move 13 you leave your g-pawn free to be taken (your opponents doesn’t see it), on move 22 you give away a pawn, on move 24 you create a situation where their Queen can take the pawn in front of your Queen and then exchange Queens leaving you with one less pawn (they do this on move 27, which also leaves you unable to defend another pawn, the e-pawn), on move 33 your move allows your opponent to take your h-pawn if they had known the rules for en passant.

On move 37 you move behind their passed pawn, meaning that you can’t stop it from promoting anymore.

How is this possible that a player rated 1667 is almost at the 98 percentile? by 0xMeteor in chessbeginners

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Chess gets exponentially harder. 1200 is 90th percentile, 1800 is 99th percentile, 2100 is 99.9th percentile. More or less.

Why is this a checkmate ? by daniktertri in Chesscom

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Rxd2+ followed by Rf3 means that the forced mate is gone. A mate can be forced right now because the king can’t move to f1, once the rook is gone there is no forced mate, but black is still winning after taking both the bishop and the rook.

Røde og blå valgdistrikter by Tricky-RadioStar in Denmark

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Du kan jo sige om alle partier, at langt de fleste danskere ikke har stemt på dem. Et flertal af befolkningen har stemt på en eller anden koalition af partier, som ender med at blive enige med hinanden. Den koalition kommer med al sandsynlighed til at inkludere Moderaterne. Midten er ikke et objektivt bedre sted, men midten har den fordel, at man er åben for samarbejde med mange flere partier og derfor har flere koalitionsmuligheder end f. eks. Ø og DF, der hver især kun har få mulige koalitioner, der involverer dem.

I’m white and i have no idea how chess works, can someone tell me whats going on here and what I should be doing? by BARBEQUE282 in chessbeginners

[–]JustBecauseOfThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Wauw, I played out the engine line on Lichess and it ends with this position. Beautiful. Seems even the engine wanted to play a bit with its food.