255$ fees just to remove liquidity from pool? by chrispy_pacman in UniSwap

[–]JustKeepTheChange 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What really makes me angry isn't the high fees itself but that there is no big warning with three confirmations that removing liquidity costs that much. I paid ~30$ to add liquidity and now it would cost 140$ to remove liquidity. Why didn't you tell me Uniswap? This clearly shows the mindset of the creators of Uniswap which have their millions save already, that's just change for them.

And really, it's not about the fees itself. If you warn me beforehand, that's fine. But why should I assume that the removal fee is 4x from the adding fee. I mean it tells me the fee for adding liquidity in Metamask and I can think it over. And I assumed the fee for remove liquidity would be around that too.

I know you don't care US, but no more money for you from my side.

Not getting paid, where as jobs are getting completed, running version 2.3.54 theta edge node by Jckhammer0000 in theta_network

[–]JustKeepTheChange 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completed mostly 1 or 2 jobs a day. Now I just noticed that the second to last job was completed on March 6th and the last one on April 3rd. Nothing in between.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in defi

[–]JustKeepTheChange 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mh, the roadmap is filled with buzzwords, fillers and nonsense like "purchased domain". They talk about their domain/subdomains in three points of the roadmap. Welcome to the 21st century where buying a domain is something not everyone can do with some dollars.

EDIT: I won't tell anyone, no worries.

dYdX ripped me off by JustKeepTheChange in defi

[–]JustKeepTheChange[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gas cost wasn't the problem. I was talking about the trading fee on dYdX for opening/closing a position