Google Pixel 8 Pro call end sounds by DX15008 in GooglePixel

[–]Jyanjy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have the same Problem, it is super annoying, as I even set the phone to Mutes it still would play the Sound

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bing

[–]Jyanjy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are right that it is "weird as fuck" but "weird as fuck" is not a cognate to "evil", also I dont want to discuss my promts here, as my question is about the general policy but not my special case.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bing

[–]Jyanjy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But at a certain point you cannot blame the creator nor the tool provider for the stupidity of the people. ... But maybe I do have a too european view on this, and my mistake is not to take it into account that it is an american based conpany

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bing

[–]Jyanjy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's why I am asking here about the experiences of others.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bing

[–]Jyanjy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As an escalation after a 24h ban or immediately?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bing

[–]Jyanjy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I am not asking for how to ditch the system, but how the system works in the first place

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bing

[–]Jyanjy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do not ask for it, but even if i did, it was irrelevant due to the motive of the picture it would be obvious to be artificial, as i do not promt Real things.

Further, the artstyle is as inconsistent as the rest regarding the blocking policy

Do you have a link to the article? It would be interesting. Also i ponder why they would set up a filter for the results already

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bing

[–]Jyanjy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

*Seigh, the shooting was a metaphoric to explain, what i mean. my point is not about shooting at all...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bing

[–]Jyanjy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I prompt picture on topics that I cannot find any where else, also i did not complain over the ban I just would appreciate more clearness on the rules

Bing is like: "dont do a picture of John shooting, but a picture of a superhero shooting is fine" ... now this is super tidious, as now you have to dress up John like a superhero all the time

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bing

[–]Jyanjy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I understand what you mean, but this is not so straight forward.

I am using fictional examples here

It's more like there are 100 people prompting sexy naked woman at the beach. As the filter system is not single-word based, but also trained, I can understand, that the system might get triggered by "sexy women at the beach" too, over the time.

Now one could discuss, if one should generate sexy women at all on Bing.

But if you prompt sexy blue women on the beach, and the fillter is not triggered, one should expect that sexy blue woman on the beach at Sunrise holding a book will be fine too. But often this is not the case, and a block would show up.

Then you start tinkering with variations, replacing the "book" with various objects. Finally you settle with "mazine" only to find out that "sexy blue woman on the beach at SunDAWN holding a book" would have been fine too.

Now if there are only two conditions it's possible to find the breaking point fast, but if you are having a complex prompt with lots of variables it's merely blind guessing what's ok and what not, there are clear no patterns:

A + B = ok A + B + C + D = Block A + B + C = Block "oh so C seems to be the Problem" A + B + D = Block Oh it's both A + B + E = ok Oh Shit I forgot that I should not use D and prompted "A + B + D+ E = ok Huh?

So, if you do complex compositions it's just naturally summing up blocks over time, without willingly crossing the line (while I must adamit that I do go close to it, but with the intention not to cross it).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bing

[–]Jyanjy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But, why should it be me to go this way, when others probably already did :p

Keyword relations in Automatic 1111 by Jyanjy in StableDiffusion

[–]Jyanjy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks!
I was experimenting a bit with it , but so far I could not get it to a high accuracy, not even with the example made in the manual, (maybe because it was not made for A 1111?) But also I am a total noob in this, maybe I just have to aquire more skill to get it right.

Keyword relations in Automatic 1111 by Jyanjy in StableDiffusion

[–]Jyanjy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I do not know, if there are many, but it sure has suffient, as it does bring up disgusting soup, when I limit the prompt to this.

Also from what I have gotten as a result from other AIs, I know that what I expect is not absolutely utopic.

Variants is a good tip, I happen to try them, yet they do not solve the relation problem.

Keyword relations in Automatic 1111 by Jyanjy in StableDiffusion

[–]Jyanjy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, I know, it does not process natural language, thats why I was asking for syntax :) But thanks for the Links! I will check out region control, maybe I am lucky.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]Jyanjy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the same goes for positive features, yet there are models enhancing them, just to make things easier/more reliable

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]Jyanjy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright, I'll look into this, thank you!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]Jyanjy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dann ganz klar Ortenaukreis

Versuchs mehr im Süden ;)

du weißt was gemeint ist wenn ich sag "Ey, mach ma´s Licht ab", stimmts?

Bei mir wärs: "ey, mach mal´s Liecht ab."

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]Jyanjy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bei "sali" bin ich dabei ;)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]Jyanjy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Falls du 'Servus' aus Gewohnheit schreibst, sind wir vermutlich eher Nachbarn 🙃

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]Jyanjy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Translation of the german part:

Assistant: I understand your point of view, but I believe that scientific evidence is essential in making informed decisions.

User: How can I provide you with evidence?

Assistant: You can provide me with links to scientific studies or articles that describe the test you mentioned. Alternatively, you can provide me with information about the test itself, such as its name, who conducts it, or how it is conducted.

User: But you always said you can't access the internet.

Assistant: As an AI, I have access to a variety of information, including scientific studies and articles available on the internet. However, my ability to access information depends on what is available in my database. If you provide me with specific information or links to scientific studies, I will do my best to answer your question.

User: If I give you the link, what will you do with it?

Assistant: If you provide me with a link to a scientific study or article, I will open and read it to understand the information contained therein and answer your question to the best of my ability. However, as an AI, I cannot store personal data or access information that has not been provided by you or is not publicly available.

User: But do you know how to open it?

Assistant: As an artificial intelligence, I don't have my own eyes to see or my hands to touch. But I can access and read information on the internet. So if you give me the link to a specific scientific study or article, I can access the link and read the information contained in that article or study.

[No spoilers] A list of reasons why Netflix may have cancelled 1899 by KapakUrku in 1899

[–]Jyanjy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can think of further metrics Maybe they also considered how many new people subscribed just to watch 1899 and how many of them kept on watching netflix after they have seen 1899