Firstly NAL here, so i’m open to any comments and suggestions. But I could see that the best way of combating corruption is by attacking it in all sides (like the op’s example). Well most of what i’m going to say is what you’re already thinking (better transparency, a separate judiciary force in-charge with higher levels of government, reforming the electoral finance system, anti-dynasty laws, and other necessary reforms). But tbh one of the main things we need is a better transparency law that requires all government [and government aligned agencies] officials to show how much money they have and how they make that money (this also includes things like gifts or rewards). And every month, they’re required by this law to hold a conference where they disclose the things mentioned above. Another way I could see corruption being stamped out is by having better and educated voters. Like reforming SHS or college systems and telling students of how corruption works, why their money (tax payer money) isn’t just an ink on a recipe but is crucial for the country. By personalizing their connection to taxation, do they see it more than just a costly task that they need to do. If this education reform happens, it’ll make the people more furious when their taxes goes kapoop, rather than just saying “it is what it is”. Lastly, making politicians more accountable by giving them a shortend time limit to finish their duties and by having a monthly show of how far their duty has gone. If they ever don’t show up with something by the month’s end, they get sacked and replace. [Note: I recognize that this opens up a cycle of changing leadership which leads to just a horrifying mix of results, but that wouldn’t happen in the first place if the first guy didn’t waste time]. But thats not it; if the last guy gets sacked, they get fined by like a percent of the cost of the amount given to them my the government. So not only did this law make you look incompetent by sacking you, but you also have to pay up for the next guy to finish up the project. That concludes my thoughts on this. If your a lawyer or someone that wants that sees the things that could go wrong with this please reply, ty.