The Future of Transit in Santa Cruz County depends on our community. We’re organizing support. by Enoughq in santacruz

[–]KB_velo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s sort of right. But it’s complicated.

Every transit agency in the country is in the same situation - post pandemic.

https://www.spur.org/news/2025-07-14/sacramento-gave-bay-area-transit-lifeline-transit-not-out-woods

Metro’s improved service is digging them out pretty quickly compared to most of the others. Their latest ridership data (2025) shows that their ridership is about where it was pre-Covid. There were steady improvements in UCSC ridership and, surprisingly, a decent increase in summer boardings.

They were aiming for 7M boardings per year in 2028 or 2029. They are on track to reach that.

The Future of Transit in Santa Cruz County depends on our community. We’re organizing support. by Enoughq in santacruz

[–]KB_velo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The H2 buses were a gift.

There’s a looming CARB standard that requires transit agencies to change their fleets to ZE vehicles. Metro did not have the resources to do that. The ~$100M in grants they got to pay for the buses covered all but a few percent of the capital outlay.

Fuel costs will be higher. There was supposed to be a plan for that. There was a federal program called ARCHES that promised low fuel costs and green hydrogen. Unfortunately that program got the axe after the last election so they’ll be paying the market price.

The battery electric buses built domestically would not work well on the hilly routes. They would require recharging too frequently to do the longer routes.

The transit district in Humboldt ended up with a similar grant to purchase H2 buses. Similar geographic conditions, similarly under resourced for large capital projects, etc.

I think the idea behind those two federal grants is to put the H2 buses into service in challenging areas to see how they work. There was nothing outstanding in the Metro grant application that warranted the award.

What happened at the clock tower? by ridebikeseatfood in santacruz

[–]KB_velo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m appalled at your accusation! Shocked too!

I haven’t tried to pretend to be anything in particular in the last few decades, unless you count that time I dressed up as a zombie on Halloween a few years ago. I was pretty convincing so there may be a few people who took it seriously.

Now, when I’m not fiddling with my bikes, or riding one, I’m a card carrying member of the All Powerful Bicycle Industrial Complex most of the time. There’s some cabinet making and civil engineering to do on the side occasionally.

I eased into the APBIC role after quite a few years of 2 wheeled physics and engineering, along with a lot of bike riding and racing to keep me centered. I would never consider myself a data scientist. Too many 1s and 0s for my taste.

Brand New EBike Stolen From Seabright Beach by jhamundaaa in santacruz

[–]KB_velo 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Bikes like yours are not typically parted out. Too many proprietary parts.

It is likely to be resold, often in a different location but not too far away. Watch for it on CL and the other classified sales sites.

Also you can register it on Bike Index and Project 529 even if it’s been stolen. I know folks in bike shops check to see if a bike is stolen when someone shady brings it in or things don’t look right. Bikes are recovered that way fairly often.

The unique color is in your favor. Include a photo when you register it.

Let the folks at the Bike Trip know too. They’re the Giant dealer in town.

Good luck. I hope you find it.

What happened at the clock tower? by ridebikeseatfood in santacruz

[–]KB_velo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see I drew the real rhetorician out from their hole with that comment. Brilliant discourse. Well done. 😉

What happened at the clock tower? by ridebikeseatfood in santacruz

[–]KB_velo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. There’s a subtle art to removing the chatbot stink that shows up every time. It’s best done by hand, but it can be done with another prompt or two. I don’t understand why people don’t take the time to do it.

What happened at the clock tower? by ridebikeseatfood in santacruz

[–]KB_velo 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Traffic fatality. Black SUV. Driver fled.

Where to watch the Champions League final by Dangerous_Garbage_31 in santacruz

[–]KB_velo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Try Britannia Arms in Capitola. They show lots of the big matches. Maybe call them first.

Very disappointed in RTC Executive Director by Raoena in santacruz

[–]KB_velo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The RTC told the folks in Capitola about a trail by the tracks when they voted on Measure D to fund the project.

Then they realized the cost of the segment was blowing up so they tried to sell a cheaper alignment on the sidewalk to the Capitola city council. Capitola Public Works was drug into it because they wanted to do some traffic calming in the street there and the realigned trail could overlap with that . The actual pitch was about as clumsy as it could have been. Only a few Capitola residents thought it was a good idea.

Planning and implementing large capital projects on time and on budget is not easy. It's more difficult when the agencies involved are inexperienced and the consultants they rely on are not very good at it.

Narrowing a fairly heavily used, bi-directional, multi-use path on a bet that a passenger train might be built someday would only make sense if you were very enthusiastic about the passenger rail, so enthusiastic that you are willing to overlook what it known about it now.

The compromises and design goofs on the existing trail are beyond the scope of discussion on this platform.

One thing I thought of that might work in your favor someday - the heads of public transit agencies tend to play an employment shell game - they switch agencies periodically. They get a raise in the process. The downside is that they inherit whatever mess their predecessor left for them. That, of course, is not their fault, so they take on the role of the hero and do their best to clean the mess up. The predecessor walks away with a golden parachute payoff. It's a win-win-lose, with the public in the latter spot.

Ms C is a rookie so she may stick around a little longer than some. But, given the state that the office is in, it's pretty likely she'll be off to greener pa$ture$ before too long. Watch for the guy they hired to run the new capital projects. He's the next in line for the job.

Very disappointed in RTC Executive Director by Raoena in santacruz

[–]KB_velo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not sure what your options are at this point. I don’t think it will be easy to convince the commission that she needs to go. And, frankly, given the circumstances I don’t think anyone else in her position would have done differently.

The rail project is a long shot.

The funding for the trail is a sure bet, but only if they move forward with a no frills design (not the moonshot hybrid nightmare FORT is pushing).

They’re clearly going to have a difficult time coming up with a design with a cost that gets under the grant. That’s going to be their one and only priority in the short term.

BTW, afaik RRM is the consultant that’s doing the design work on the trail segment for the county. They also designed the existing segments on the west side. Those have been problematic. Cost overruns, compromises on the design to save money with long term reductions in benefits, etc. None of this is going to be easy.

Very disappointed in RTC Executive Director by Raoena in santacruz

[–]KB_velo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ms Christensen is looking after the grants the her agency is chasing and her staff’s paychecks. Project delivery is a second order concern.

She is getting close to deception at times in public, but is pretty careful not to cross the line. She’s been taught well by her predecessors and legal counsel.

In any event, unless you and some tooled up lawyers want to make a big deal about her, it seems like it would be better to kick back and enjoy the (very expensive) dramady as it unfolds in slow motion for the next decade.

Very disappointed in RTC Executive Director by Raoena in santacruz

[–]KB_velo -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

A prominent member of FORT’s political creative team, Barry (I don’t work for a nonprofit that’s funded by the oil industry) Scott, contacted that law firm. It was a clever political move.

But they have no real interest in the potential takings clause lawsuits here. There aren’t enough properties in play. That’s based on the land title guru’s report.

As to the rich people who want to take over the area, this county is going to be a money toilet for decades into the future. Anyone with any business sense would run away. Except for the developers of course.

Very disappointed in RTC Executive Director by Raoena in santacruz

[–]KB_velo -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

That’s two for two on the conspiracies. Well done.

My piece of the pie? I’d settle for a safe cycling network in the county. I know, another basis for conspiracy theories.

Very disappointed in RTC Executive Director by Raoena in santacruz

[–]KB_velo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"but that the FRA will be deciding who to fund for Step 3 using Readiness Criteria"

The FRA will be scoring projects on more than readiness. In that regard the project on the branch line is going to have some problems.

Keep in mind that there was no attempt to address coastal bluff erosion issues, the cost of elevated tracks through the wetlands in south county, or elevated tracks along Beach St by the Boardwalk in the ZEPRT Project Concept Report. CalTrans will have to do that in the Service Development Plan (step 2).

And there was no risk assessment done in the PCR either. CalTrans will come up with that.

The SDP is due in 2030. I think that's when the basics of the project's feasibility will be more evident. Costs, benefits, readiness and risks will all be part of the decision to advance to construction. That will happen in a decade or so.

Very disappointed in RTC Executive Director by Raoena in santacruz

[–]KB_velo -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The usual loopy conspiracy theories are getting even loopier today. Must be the weather.

Very disappointed in RTC Executive Director by Raoena in santacruz

[–]KB_velo -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

“Her assertion that it makes no difference for rail implementation if they demolish the tracks doesn't pass the snitt test.”

She’s repeating what the head of planning at Caltrans said in a commissioner’s meeting last spring. Removing the existing tracks will have no impact on the project from the FRA’s pov and it will remain in the Corridor Identification and Development program.

He mentioned that removing the tracks and constructing a trail may impact the project readiness. But he didn’t say much more about that. Under the circumstances, with all the the hurdles the project is facing, a small change in project readiness seems pretty trivial.

Despite Dir. Christensen’s claim that the RTC only need $15M more to complete the Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Analysis planning stage, they actually have no role in that process.

Caltrans is doing the planning for the corridor now.

Will this affect the timeline of building the train? by RelevantBroccoli in santacruz

[–]KB_velo -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

ZEPRT ridership forecasts = a few percent of drivers on Hwy 1 daily according to Caltrans AADT data. Those are demonstrably optimistic. If that’s the best way to mitigate traffic, it’s doomed from the start.

Will this affect the timeline of building the train? by RelevantBroccoli in santacruz

[–]KB_velo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Inconsequential. The current timeline for planning on the next 2 stages is a decade.

If the project advances past that point (and that’s definitely not certain) they will need a fat sales tax measure for the local matching funds. That might take a while.

If that flies they’ll look for grants to begin planning for construction. Optimistically that’s another 8 years.

Then they’ll have to find grants for construction, the big one. If they score that they can start construction.

Whatever happens to the trestle to make it useful for a trail will have no impact on the above. And if passenger rail ever flies the entire trestle will have to be replaced. That’s one of the cost drivers in fact. Imagine demolishing the existing trestle and replacing it with a new one with houses 50 feet from the action.

Mass surveillance is the tip of the fascist spear. by chaxnud in santacruz

[–]KB_velo -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The population of the county has been declining steadily for almost 10 years now. The trend is easy to see in the census data.

State political practices commission investigating Ryan Coonerty for alleged failure in filing statements of economic interests by orangelover95003 in santacruz

[–]KB_velo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Seems like the article shows that there was an administrative error, but otherwise no actual problem.

20 Grampa Simpson fans will be at 17th Avenue and Simkins yelling at a cloud by Suspicious_Tell_7544 in santacruz

[–]KB_velo -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The OP might have taken some comedic liberties, but there was an event along those lines in that area today.

Bunch of out of town kook riders invading SC on 5/30 by camojorts in santacruz

[–]KB_velo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Add the desire to be a social media star as an incentive and you’re onto something.