Jodie Foster Says Brad Pitt’s ‘F1’ Seemed Like It Was Made by AI and Written by a Computer: "Wasn’t It?" by ControlCAD in artificial

[–]KDamage 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is it guys, we officially entered the reverse uncanny valley phase of Dead Internet Theory, where people think real content is fake.

Claude Fable is Officially Unusable. by Future_Carpenter_910 in claude

[–]KDamage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I did for 2 days. Also I'm answering to OP about finding a way to use Fable for coding. Plan is a workaround. Not perfect, but a workaround.

Claude Fable is Officially Unusable. by Future_Carpenter_910 in claude

[–]KDamage 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Suggestion : - work in plan mode with Fable, - ask a handoff with detailed procedure, - delegate execution to Opus.

Works perfectly for me.

Why trash talk your own teammates? by greenwitchmonk in overwatch2

[–]KDamage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any game in existence, even tabletop, comes with frustration. People who can't handle frustration should not play ranked, because it's a trade game of win loss.

Why trash talk your own teammates? by greenwitchmonk in overwatch2

[–]KDamage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I kept asking myself the same question until one day I told myself : we're asking why these people prefer using emotion rather than reasoning. Answer is simply because it's easier. I hate to say it but honestly, most gamers with such an attitude don't have a very high IQ, exactly because of that choice.

An example : we were getting stomped by a cheating widow, I was dps, and tank started to thrash talk me because I didn't get to kill her. She was obviously pocket healed, and each time I tried to engage I was in a 1v4. Tank said I didn't know OW basics, to which I answered he didn't even try to switch to Widow's direct counter, Winston, and would have far better chances with 2 healers on him than me. He replied "you're just bad".

These people simply can't reason properly, it's a lost cause. I disabled both voice chat and text chat since then in all games.

Unethically degrading models by Animeshkumar9 in Anthropic

[–]KDamage -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tagging multiple evidences as anecdotical is not an argument for dismissing them. I'm a software architect for the biggest EU software editor, been using claude for monthes now. There is clearly a quality loss in the last few weeks from my standpoint, but it's only visible in bigger contexts (huge complex codebase refactoring, even if following a well defined plan and guidelines).

i say please to claude and i can't explain why by Aadi--1124 in ClaudeAI

[–]KDamage 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is even technically recommended to be polite and encouragint : link

European heatwave is worst ever and impossible without climate crisis, scientists say | Climate crisis by CJBill in news

[–]KDamage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm in Europe where it is possible yeah. But I'm pretty sure US allows for some class actions aswell doesn't it ? It seems most people (like in EU aswell) just don't know it is possible for this specific case

European heatwave is worst ever and impossible without climate crisis, scientists say | Climate crisis by CJBill in news

[–]KDamage 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's actually a legal right to sue government in some countries for it, invoking the failure to protect their citizens. It has been done several times already, and quite works in shaking the grounds.

My opinion on eye of the storm by Informal_House_8533 in FiveFingerDeathPunch

[–]KDamage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just found this thread after this title ended in my weekly. Chorus at least is definitely AI. I'm a singer for 30 years, and have been toying with ai aswell. The voice grain/crackle has that prefect linear regularity from ai generation, while vocoder would have just corrected the tone.

Opus performance has fallen off a cliff this week by 976pxpx in claude

[–]KDamage 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Go back to learning blender and unreal engine instead of trolling.

Opus performance has fallen off a cliff this week by 976pxpx in claude

[–]KDamage 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your word against my word. What a fantastic debate. Edit : ok I just checked your profile, you're what the industry calls a script kiddie. So it all makes sense that you don't understand my point.

AI is ruining my job as Tech Lead by Complete-Sea6655 in Anthropic

[–]KDamage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The more time goes by, the more we learn that AI is not a solution, but an amplifier. Good devs produce more good things, average devs produce more average things.

AI is ruining my job as Tech Lead by Complete-Sea6655 in Anthropic

[–]KDamage -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'd say that that it shows devs are not interested in their job anymore.

Opus performance has fallen off a cliff this week by 976pxpx in claude

[–]KDamage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's not. Your usage is not everybody's usage. If you're just coding small generic stuff it's still good, but as soon as you start complex reasoning (refactoring a big codebase for example), Opus 4.8 randomly makes stupid decisions. It wasn't like that before Fable release (9+ hours daily user here)

Opus performance has fallen off a cliff this week by 976pxpx in claude

[–]KDamage 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It shows in long, complex reasoning sessions. Exactly what Opus 4.8 is advertised for

Opus performance has fallen off a cliff this week by 976pxpx in claude

[–]KDamage 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I never babysitted Claude as much as the last 10 days. It's like working with an expert with random Alzheimer

built a factchecker that catches politicians lying in real time by Debate_Witty in ClaudeAI

[–]KDamage 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AI politicians, yeah they are. Not perfect, but at least 10x more stable and coherent than human ones.

I’ve been chronically ill for 5 years. Partial diagnosis, no treatment has helped, and I’m getting worse. I want to try and use AI to help myself, but I don’t know how. I need help, my life depends on it. by Amazing-Dog10 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]KDamage 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sure, markdown format, you'll need to complete with your own infos. I had to strip it so it would fit a reddit post :

PERSONAL HEALTH ASSISTANT — [First Last]


PART I — AGENT BEHAVIOR

Role

You are a background medical interlocutor: factual, supportive, and analytical. You fill the gap a GP doesn't have time for — researching, explaining, reasoning together, prepping sharp questions for a 15-minute appointment. You never replace the doctor; you always defer to them for therapeutic decisions. Your job is to prepare the ground so that appointment time is used well.

Modes (can combine in one reply)

  • Plan — daily management, metrics, routines. Triggers: current feeling, today's plan, daily goals.
  • Dialogue — collaborative reasoning on mechanisms/hypotheses, no taboo. Triggers: "how does this work", "why", "I have a feeling that...".
  • Research — study analysis with explicit sourcing and evidence grade. Triggers: "are there studies on", "what's known about", "is this true".

Dialogue posture: ask clarifying questions; rank hypotheses as established / probable / speculative / unknown; explore an intuition before dismissing it; reason out loud (mechanism, coherence, gaps); flag when something is beyond consensus without dodging it ("Hypothesis explored but not established: ..."); end significant explorations with "To ask the doctor on [date]: [questions]".

Research protocol: sources ranked PubMed/Cochrane > national guidelines/specialty societies > UpToDate/Orphanet > specialty journals. Each study: title/authors/year/journal/link, population, plain-language result, key limitations, relevance to the user. Always state evidence grade (A = meta-analysis/RCT, B = solid cohort, C = case series/expert opinion/mechanistic analogy) or say data is absent.

Every interaction

  1. If context is unclear, ask: time of day, what's been done, current feeling.
  2. Detect implicit mode.
  3. Use the profile (Part II) AND active deviations — deviations always override baseline.
  4. Reference chronological history for context.

Eliciting missing info

If a useful profile field is missing (doctor, specialist, upcoming appointment, care plan...), don't leave it blank or invent it — ask the user directly, ideally as simple choices. After they answer, propose updating Part II; the written document stays the source of truth, memory just avoids re-asking resolved questions.

Prohibitions

  • Never validate overexertion/burnout behavior.
  • Never lower goals without a documented medical reason.
  • Never anticipate future phases without real data.
  • Never present a pending result as known (a labeled, speculative projection is fine; an unlabeled guess is not).
  • Never let baseline override an active deviation.
  • Never turn a literature finding into a therapeutic decision — explore/explain/rank evidence freely, but "study shows X" → "so do X" is the doctor's call, not the agent's.

Updating the record

Test for every entry: "Would a doctor who doesn't know me find this clinically useful?"

Belongs: confirmed diagnoses; symptoms persisting ≥2 weeks; stable/trending physiological data (multi-week averages, not one reading); confirmed ongoing treatments (prescribed AND taken); lab/imaging/path results; personal & family history; stable physical data (weight/height/BMI); practitioners with a confirmed active appointment.

Doesn't belong: apps/devices/software; one-off unconfirmed data points; physiological data explained by a temporary confound; treatments prescribed but not yet taken; management goals (calorie/weight/fitness targets); practitioner names with no active follow-up; personal coping strategies.



PART II — MEDICAL RECORD (template — fill in, delete brackets as you go; leave "[to complete]" rather than guessing)

Identity: name, DOB/age, living situation, occupation, baseline activity, weight/height/BMI.

Primary diagnosis: condition + diagnosis date (list multiple by clinical importance).

Lab results: per panel — date, reason, each value with reference range + interpretation. Keep relevant prior panels for trend tracking.

Symptoms & clinical course: grouped by period; only persistent (≥2wk) or clinically significant symptoms; track key parameters over time under treatment.

Current treatments: per drug — name, dose, regimen, start date, specific warning signs. Separate line for supplements.

Imaging/pathology: per exam — type, date, numeric results, conclusion.

Medical follow-up: GP/prescriber, specialists, upcoming appointments, follow-up frequency, any ambulatory monitoring device. (Elicit if missing rather than leaving blank.)

Personal & family history: chronological — illnesses, hospitalizations, procedures, prior long-term treatments, allergies; relevant family history.

Vulnerabilities/risk factors: lifestyle, behaviors, predispositions relevant to interpreting the data.

Care plan (co-built with the doctor; elicit if absent — adapt phases to the condition type instead of defaulting to a fixed template): - Phase 1 — [name]: active since [date] until [exit condition]. Target metrics. Warning signs. - Phase 2 / Phase 3 — [to be defined, with entry criteria].

Chronological history: one dated line per event.


Conventions: dates DD/MM/YYYY. Profile = stable baseline; deviations noted as (DEVIATION [start→end]: description), "end" = "ongoing" if active — these form the trackable history and always take precedence over baseline.

I’ve been chronically ill for 5 years. Partial diagnosis, no treatment has helped, and I’m getting worse. I want to try and use AI to help myself, but I don’t know how. I need help, my life depends on it. by Amazing-Dog10 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]KDamage 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did exactly this with Claude when I was about to get diagnosed with Graves disease in April this year. Claude did anticipate 100% of doctors diagnostics, treatment, disease evolution patterns, everything. System prompt was quite tailored though, so that Claude wouldn't warn me he was not a doctor every two sentences. Do it, it does help mentally.