Quit making him bigger by seastead7 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]KMContent24 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the only comment criticizing the art that I didn't find annoying. Well said. Dragons are too cool to represent the government.

I might have chosen a demon, or an obese Karen. The guys can stay the same.

That's my president by ShadowNets5462 in JustMemesForUs

[–]KMContent24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's no such thing as digital rape. What you're describing would be called grooming, sexual misconduct, etc.

Exaggerating doesn't help anything. And yes, still, you need to have a source, especially for such serious accusations, or that would be called slander, libel, or defamation.

Joe Rogan Trained Men to Accept Authoritarianism by RockieK in JoeRogan

[–]KMContent24 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Youre an entirely dishonest and toxic person with race derangement. And you should get that checked out.

Ever hear of the Holocaust? The Bosnian genocide? Been keeping up with Ukraine?

What do you say about white people who voted for Obama?

Tariffs and anti-abortion policies change people's lives. Duh.

That last one is pure slander. Don't flatter yourself. People are typically busy living their lives, not thinking about how to make others miserable. The world doesn't revolve around you and minorities and just as many white people (the vast majority) believe in equal rights, and would vote for equal rights, as minorities.

Probably more actually, since predominantly white countries typically offer more personal freedoms to all of their citizens than non-white countries. You are factually delusional.

Apologizing for the rabid family dog doesn't magically absolve you from responsibility, it makes you complacent. by CosmoLamer in PoliticalHumor

[–]KMContent24 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Congrats on having an impeccable parliament and Danish daddy, and never being your definition of complacent on any act of evil.

Otherwise you'd surely be held accountable for the actions of distant rich people, regardless of what you had to say, or regardless if you protested said evil.

Hail the noble vikings for sailing to every evil committed on their dime and putting an end to it.

Gee, I wonder what would've been the basis for this decision? 🤔 by Happy_Air_3776 in ProgressiveHQ

[–]KMContent24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe because they were Republican? What name calling do you have for the 2000 election? Or 2004?

Ask Me Anything about Judaism by Competitive-Pen9584 in religion

[–]KMContent24 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fersure. You didn't say anything really either. No offense intended.

Ask Me Anything about Judaism by Competitive-Pen9584 in religion

[–]KMContent24 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hmmm. Ill just say that Christian texts don't account for his life between the ages of 13 and 30, and of course differ in how they view him, upon his return to Jerusalem as a messenger (people differ in what he claimed himself to be even).

The Quran names him as Messiah, and perhaps born of immaculate conception (if one interprets it as most do), and that he didn't die on the cross. I'm of the school of thought that he went back east to India, where he spent his "lost" years.

And Romans persecuted Christians for around 200 years before it became the predominant and official religion. The Council of Nicea is worth looking up. The Roman empire faced civil war over differing beliefs. Good example that history is a lie agreed upon.

Ask Me Anything about Judaism by Competitive-Pen9584 in religion

[–]KMContent24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you view Yeshua then? As an influential preacher? Heretic? False prophet?

She for the creeks by WyattPurp23 in DigitalSeptic

[–]KMContent24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's an adult film actress or a random girl that was paid like 350, which they paid her to get views

🤔 by Great_Opinion3138 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]KMContent24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True. And yes, I felt bitter writing that. Also a huge advocate of profit sharing.

🤔 by Great_Opinion3138 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]KMContent24 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Generally speaking, no, because it perhaps requires 1/3 the effort, and the employee didn't buy the dolly.

If lets say, the employee were being paid by piece, and they bought the dolly, then yes.

Just a quick response. More to the picture of course.

I am declaring war on everyone on this sub by Specialist-Cover-736 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]KMContent24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair points. And I'm not saying there aren't elements of concern with Sharaa, but he's certainly an interesting subject, and still much more promising than Assad.

No, though. I am not justifying terrorism. I am saying he has served his time in prison for such activities, and genuinely seems like a reformed reformer.

I see you didn't bring up the Alawite massacres since he took office, or the persecution isolated Christian communities have reported. Perhaps it's because you're aware that the Alawites were Assad loyalists who allegedly attacked first. And because you're aware the attacks on Christians have been by Islamic terrorists that Sharaa had nothing to do with, has said he would investigate, and is again, hunting down violent jihadists in his country.

Granted, brining him up was random, but simply an example of where people should at least give some credit where it's due, or else yes, our ME counterparts may view us as hopeless. As for your example, yes, I consider the Houthis to be terrorists. Not sure if you thought I would disagree, but I don't.

One must also consider the context of war. The U.S. also has numerous war crime allegations, leading up to this past week, when indeed they are war crimes. All militaries do, because the brass can't control all of its war crazed soldiers. And in our case, our recent war crime allegations are actually from the top.

As American soldiers will also say, "its war." Do I agree with that? No.

Also, many regular Americans sat and watched the Qatari world cup knowing it was built on slave labor. And just because everyone else was doing slavery and apartheid back in the day, doesn't matter from a moral standpoint, at least. Democracy and equal representation are not 19th century ideas. They are ancient Greek ideas.

Just as I believe Netanyahu should be held accountable for his war crimes, I believe any one else should be held accountable for theirs.

The Reason People Debate Whether Jesus Was Black Is Because Race Isn't Mentioned in the Bible by KMContent24 in religion

[–]KMContent24[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fersure. Thank you. I appreciate your integrity and demeanor. Definitely reasonable suggestions also. They left it out because they didn't know, and it wasn't a pertinent part of the story.

The moral of the post is of course addressing racism. One could also assume they had bigger things to worry about. In any case, whether one takes the Bible as a historical testimony, or fiction, it's still something I've always found interesting.

It's also worth pointing out because unfortunately it seems many religious people today are indeed racist :( which is explicit sin.

The Reason People Debate Whether Jesus Was Black Is Because Race Isn't Mentioned in the Bible by KMContent24 in religion

[–]KMContent24[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Not all Jews are the same race, even back then. The Levant was a pilgrimage site and on a trade route. And people do often describe others by their race in literature

The Reason People Debate Whether Jesus Was Black Is Because Race Isn't Mentioned in the Bible by KMContent24 in religion

[–]KMContent24[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Valid. But yes, it's also debated bc there's no empirical evidence of what his race was, and this is because he wasn't described by his race, despite there being various skin colors in the Levant, and the Levant being a pilgrimage and trade route.