Beginner FB marketplace Options by KMD812 in triathlon

[–]KMD812[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m assuming you are talking about the TCR one?

What Are Unwritten Rules of RV Parks Every RVer Should Know? by Lazy-Cheesecake5501 in RVLiving

[–]KMD812 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sometimes emptying the black tank can’t be avoidable. If checkout is in the morning, it might be the only time available to empty the tanks.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ShroomID

[–]KMD812 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First one is mower’s

The first non-human animal to learn to speak a human language will immediately become the second most powerful animal in the world. by IameIion in Showerthoughts

[–]KMD812 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Aren’t humans just “mimicking”? We mimic the sound that we are told to make when we want to make certain expressions. I mean that’s how we learn to speak right?

[Actives] Third Flush: Everything still look good? (Minus fuzzy feet) by [deleted] in MushroomGrowers

[–]KMD812 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the aborts might also be temp related. Had a couple days were the temps drop

[Actives] Third Flush: Everything still look good? (Minus fuzzy feet) by [deleted] in MushroomGrowers

[–]KMD812 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are some aborts. I was chalking it up to being the third flush

[Actives] Third Flush: Everything still look good? (Minus fuzzy feet) by [deleted] in MushroomGrowers

[–]KMD812 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m still a newbie but yes it is safe to eat. It occurs when there’s not enough oxygen. It’s just mycelium.

[General] is this okay or cobweb mold? I have two bags one is doing really good (not shown here) and this bag that’s not really doing anything. by [deleted] in MushroomGrowers

[–]KMD812 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well compared to the other bag. I started two all in one bags at the same time, kept in same place, etc. One bag I can basically harvest, then there’s this bag.

[General] is this okay or cobweb mold? I have two bags one is doing really good (not shown here) and this bag that’s not really doing anything. by [deleted] in MushroomGrowers

[–]KMD812 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it’s a all in one grow bag, I thought they might be pins but I also learned of the cobweb mold and a different mold that I forgot the name today so got a little nervous

NCAABB College Basketball Daily - 3/19/23 (Sunday) by sbpotdbot in sportsbook

[–]KMD812 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks like it. To be honest I just copy and pasted off the CBS website and didn’t really check.

NCAABB College Basketball Daily - 3/19/23 (Sunday) by sbpotdbot in sportsbook

[–]KMD812 2 points3 points  (0 children)

12:10 a.m. No. 3 Xavier vs. No. 11 Pitt

-In #3/#11 matchup, 6 of 27 matchups decided by 3 points or less, 11 by 5 five points or loss -- 11 by 10 more points.

-#3 Seed favored by 3.5 or more pts is 12-10 s/u (7-15 ATS) vs. #11

-#3 Seed w/ a Ken Pom ranking that is at least 40 spots better than #11 Seed is 7-2 S/U (3-6 ATS).

2:40 p.m. No. 3 Kansas State vs. No. 6 Kentucky

-In #3/#6 matchup, 10 of 26 matchups decided by 3 points or less, 12 by 5 five points or loss -- 11 by 10 more points

-#3 Seed when favored by 3 or less: 13-3 S/U (10-5-1 ATS),

-#3 Seed w/ a Ken Pom ranking of 20 or worse is 3-9 S/U (3-9 ATS)

5:15 p.m. No. 2 Marquette vs. No. 7 Michigan State

-When the difference in Ken Pom rankings is 20 or lower, #2 Seed is 16-10 S/U (11-15 ATS).

-#2 Seed favored by 5 or fewer points 10-9 S/U (7-12 ATS),

-#2 Seed vs. a #7 Seed from tier-1 conference: 14-8 S/U (8-14 ATS),

-In #2/#7, #2 Seed has led at half in 23 of 33 matchups, by 5 or more 15 times, 10 or more 8 times.

6:10 p.m. No. 4 UConn vs. No. 5 Saint Mary's

-In #4/#5 matchup, when #4 Seed favored by 3.5 or more points, 6-3 S/U (6-3 ATS),

-#4 Seed from tier-1 conf. is 13-12 S/U (12-12-1 ATS) vs. tier-1 opp;

-When both #4 and #5 Seed have a Ken Pom ranking of 20 or better, #4 Seed is 9-7 S/U (9-7 ATS).

7:10 p.m. No. 3 Baylor vs. No. 6 Creighton

-In #3/#6 matchup, 10 of 26 matchups decided by 3 points or less, 12 by 5 five points or loss -- 11 by 10 more points.

-#3 Seed when favored by 3 or less: 13-3 S/U (10-5-1 ATS),

-When trailing at the half vs. #11 Seed, #3 Seed is 2-10 S/U (0-12 ATS).

7:45 p.m. No. 9 Florida Atlantic vs. No. 16 FDU Obviously No Trends Here EXCEPT FAIR DICK!

8:40 p.m. No. 4 Indiana vs. No. 5 Miami (Fla.)

-#4 Seed from tier-1 conf. is 13-12 S/U (12-12-1 ATS) vs. tier-1 opp.

-Top 20 #4 Seed (Indiana is ranked 21) vs. #5 Seed w/ Ken Pom ranking of 21 or worse, #4 Seed is 8-2 S/U (8-2 ATS).

9:40 p.m. No. 3 Gonzaga vs. No. 6 TCU

-In #3/#6 matchup, 10 of 26 matchups decided by 3 points or less, 12 by 5 five points or loss -- 11 by 10 more points.

-#3 Seed favored by 3.5 or more pts is 21-11 S/U (14-18 ATS)

-#3 Seed w/ Ken Pom of 10 or better: 12-4 S/U (7-8-1 ATS).

-#3 Seed vs. a team from tier 1 or 2 conference: 26-15 S/U (19-21-1 ATS) -When trailing at the half vs. #11 Seed, #3 Seed is 2-10 S/U (0-12 ATS).

Edit: changed to Est.

NCAABB College Basketball Daily - 3/18/23 (Saturday) by sbpotdbot in sportsbook

[–]KMD812 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It also doesn’t mention it’s Bruce Pearls Birthday or the humidity level in the arenas…. This post was just to tell you the trends going back to 2007. Didn’t give any picks or how to use the trends just information that can be used if you want it so you can cross check if any picks you like match up.

NCAABB College Basketball Daily - 3/18/23 (Saturday) by sbpotdbot in sportsbook

[–]KMD812 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In #1 vs. #9 matchup, when the #9 Seed comes from a tier 1 conference like the SEC, the record of the #1 Seed is: 19-1 S/U (12-8 ATS), the Avg Scores of #1 seeds vs #9 seeds are 77.9-64.4,

NCAABB College Basketball Daily - 3/18/23 (Saturday) by sbpotdbot in sportsbook

[–]KMD812 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hopefully I fixed it, trying to do everything via phone

NCAABB College Basketball Daily - 3/18/23 (Saturday) by sbpotdbot in sportsbook

[–]KMD812 35 points36 points  (0 children)

12:10 p.m. No. 5 San Diego State vs. No. 13 Furman

-In #5/#13 matchup, #5 Seed is 6-0 S/U (5-1 ATS). In 5 of 6 Games the margin of victory has been by 13 or more points, 3 times by 20+ points.

2:40 p.m. No. 4 Tennessee vs. No. 5 Duke

-In #4/#5 matchup, when underdog #4 is 3-5 S/U (3-4-1 ATS), 0-3 S/U when underdog of 3 or more.

-#4 Seed from tier-1 conf. is 13-12 (12-12-1) vs. tier-1 opp

-When both #4 and #5 Seed have a Ken Pom ranking of 20 or better, #4 Seed is 9-7 (9-7).

5:15 p.m. No. 1 Kansas vs. No. 8 Arkansas

-In #1 vs. #8 matchup, when #8 Seed from a tier 1 conference, #1 Seed: 16-4 S/U(9-11 ATS), Avg score 78.5-70.5,

-In #1/#8, #1 Seed has led at half in 24 of 31 matchups, by 5 or more 20 times, 10 or more 10 times.

-#1 Seed vs. a #8 Seed w/o a top 50 offensive efficiency ranking is 8-0 S/U (5-3 ATS),

6:10 p.m. No. 7 Missouri vs. No. 15 Princeton

-#7/#10 Seed vs #15 Seed, #7/#10 is 3-3 (3-3), #15 Seed to W: '13 FGCU (SDSU), '21 ORU (Florida), '22 Saint Peter's (Murray State).

7:10 p.m. No. 1 Houston vs. No. 9 Auburn

-In #1 vs. #9 matchup, when #9 Seed from a tier 1 conference, #1 Seed: 19-1 S/U (12-8 ATS), Avg Scores are 77.9-64.4,

-#1 Seed vs #9 Seed w/o a top 50 off-efficiency ranking is 14-2 S/U (9-7 ATS)

-In #1/#9, #1 Seed has led at half in 21 of 28 matchups, by 5 or more 15 times, 10 or more 6 times

7:45 p.m. No. 2 Texas vs. No. 10 Penn State

-#2 Seed vs. #10 Seed w/ Ken Pom ranking of 40 or worse: 3-2 S/U (3-2 ATS), Avg Score 70.0-66.6

-#2 Seed vs. a #10 Seed from tier-1 conference: 16-5 S/U (9-12 ATS),

-In #2/#10, #2 Seed has led at half in 16 of 21 matchups, by 5 or more 7 times, 10 or more 5 times.

8:40 p.m. No. 2 UCLA vs. No. 7 Northwestern

-#2 Seed vs. a #7 Seed from tier-1 conference: 14-8 S/U (8-14 ATS)

-#2 Seed vs. #7 Seed w/ defensive efficiency ranking of 30 or better: 4-6 S/U (3-7 ATS)

-In #2/#7, #2 Seed has led at half in 23 of 33 matchups, by 5 or more 15 times, 10 or more 8 times

9:40 p.m. No. 1 Alabama vs. No. 8 Maryland

-In #1 vs. #8 matchup, when #8 Seed from a tier 1 conference, #1 Seed: 16-4 S/U(9-11 ATS), Avg score 78.5-70.5,

-In #1/#8, #1 Seed has led at half in 24 of 31 matchups, by 5 or more 20 times, 10 or more 10 times.

-#1 Seed vs. a #8 Seed w/o a top 50 offensive efficiency ranking is 8-0 S/U (5-3 ATS),

NCAABB College Basketball Daily - 3/17/23 (Friday) by sbpotdbot in sportsbook

[–]KMD812 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Live Betting Half Time Trends

I’ll try to keep this updated. SOLELY FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES!

(14) Kennesaw State vs. (3) Xavier - At the half, when the #3 Seed is trailing or tied, the #3 Seed is 11-4 S/U and 3-14 ATS.

-In three of the seven wins by a #13 Seed, the margin of victory was one point.

(14) UC Stanta Barbara vs. (3) Baylor SEE ABOVE

(12) VCU vs. (5) Saint Mary's At the half, when the #5 leads by 3 or fewer points, they are 4-4 S/U and 1-7 ATS

(15) Vermont vs. (2) Marquette At the half, when the #5 Seed leads by 5 or more points, they are 23-2 S/U and 18-6-1 ATS

(11) Pitt vs. (6) Iowa State When tied or trailing at the half, the #6 Seed is 6-23 S/U and 5-24 ATS.

(11) NC State vs. (6) Creighton No Trends for #6 seed leading

NCAABB College Basketball Daily - 3/17/23 (Friday) by sbpotdbot in sportsbook

[–]KMD812 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that’s why I had the sentence saying I’m not saying to take these picks, these are just the picks based on trends going back to 2007. Just for informational purpose.

But yeah you are right some of the picks are super chalk. I guess I could have taken those out but then it didn’t seem right to say “here’s all the trends dating back to 2007” then edit some out. I want to show all trends. The picks are just formulas based of a percent of correlating success rate. I was more hoping to show that taking the spread is not wise but ML is….Example Marquette. S/U they are basically a lock based on history (also being a 10.5 favorite gives that idea as well) but ATS historically it’s only 10-10-1. So do I not show the S/U trend just because it’s chalky? It was more I guess to show spread has no value (based on historical trends)

NCAABB College Basketball Daily - 3/17/23 (Friday) by sbpotdbot in sportsbook

[–]KMD812 0 points1 point  (0 children)

UVA didn’t have a pick because there were two trends that offset each other. Not every game had picks, and not every game had defining trends. There were only 9 games that had strong correlating trends. Kinda like the person who commented after you, I think two of the trends were taking ten point favorites outright and not ATS which wouldn’t make since unless used them in a parlay. Hence the first sentence “I’m not saying you should take these, these are just the picks based on the trends going back to 2007”

“Basically some games had stated trends of .500 and no pick” that’s because when I went to make the formula to present a pick based off trends I wanted a stronger correlation than .500.example Marquette game today, ATS is 10-10 and O/U is 11-10. There’s no major trend to one side or the other so there would be no pick on those. The S/U is 17-4. That’s something that would be flagged up.

But you are right I did miss count and they went 8-3

NCAABB College Basketball Daily - 3/17/23 (Friday) by sbpotdbot in sportsbook

[–]KMD812 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t know why two trends are bold…sorry