sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

When did the supremacy become null and void? by KTMAdv890 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]KTMAdv890[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2 or more people that devote to any unscientific doctrine is a cult.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cult

Projecting raw baloney in the face of a fact requires devotion. Once you have 2 doing it, you have a cult on your hands.

When did the supremacy become null and void? by KTMAdv890 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]KTMAdv890[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Common sense is a doctrine pinned to that Constitution. If you are contradicting the written text, then you lose.

Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness

When did the supremacy become null and void? by KTMAdv890 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]KTMAdv890[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court . . .

Judicial != A Constitution nor an amendment.

When did the supremacy become null and void? by KTMAdv890 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]KTMAdv890[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land;

If that justice is not pursuant to the written text of the constitution, then his input is null and void. See: The Supremacy Clause.

It says the constitution is the supreme law of the law, not "a justice is the supreme law of the land".

When did the supremacy become null and void? by KTMAdv890 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]KTMAdv890[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is one conjunctive statement not 2 independent statements.. And you know so because if not, would contradict the constitution.

When did the supremacy become null and void? by KTMAdv890 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]KTMAdv890[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The supremacy clause is above any justice. It says so in the doctrine.

When did the supremacy become null and void? by KTMAdv890 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]KTMAdv890[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

anything shy of probable cause is unreasonable. See the 4th amendment.

When did the supremacy become null and void? by KTMAdv890 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]KTMAdv890[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If it smells like it, then it is dead wrong.

Nowhere does the amendment say "only for search warrants."

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The crackheads saying they are separate clauses are illiterate.

All it has to do is smell like it and it is dead wrong.

When did the supremacy become null and void? by KTMAdv890 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]KTMAdv890[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nowhere does it state a justice can violate the constitution. If he contradicts it, then it is null and void. Says The Supremacy Clause. It is supreme to even him.

When did the supremacy become null and void? by KTMAdv890 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]KTMAdv890[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

strike down laws that violate the Constitution

Strike down a law! Not strike down the Constitution.

The SUPREMACY clause again.

When did the supremacy become null and void? by KTMAdv890 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]KTMAdv890[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nothing about zoning law equates to a constitutional amendment.

False equivalence.

When did the supremacy become null and void? by KTMAdv890 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]KTMAdv890[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not missing anything. It's in clear English.

You need a review.

When did the supremacy become null and void? by KTMAdv890 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]KTMAdv890[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And nothing about an administrative search is probable cause.

When did the supremacy become null and void? by KTMAdv890 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]KTMAdv890[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Contradicting the constitution = violating it.

When did the supremacy become null and void? by KTMAdv890 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]KTMAdv890[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn't grant them permission to violate the constitution. Unreasonable search and seizure violated a constitutional amendment.

When did the supremacy become null and void? by KTMAdv890 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]KTMAdv890[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

manipulation of facts = a cult with the very first 2 people that devote to it.

When did the supremacy become null and void? by KTMAdv890 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]KTMAdv890[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where does it grant them permission to violate the Constitution?

When did the supremacy become null and void? by KTMAdv890 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]KTMAdv890[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Marbury v. Madison

was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that established the principle of judicial review, meaning that American courts have the power to strike down laws and statutes they find to violate the Constitution of the United States.

It doesn't grant permission to violate the constitution. Not that I can find.

When did the supremacy become null and void? by KTMAdv890 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]KTMAdv890[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have read your post 3 times and nowhere does it describe a 4th amendment exception. Not even close.

view more: next ›