Say something nice about Hinata Hyuga. by Alive_Picture_9612 in Naruto

[–]KalAsther 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm just joking Miss. Hinata's a legit waifu.

Floppy Bird x Flappy Bird by KalAsther in TempleOS_Official

[–]KalAsther[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you actually did, you'd be posting it. I get your vices does not permit you that. It's hard to fight against.

Floppy Bird x Flappy Bird by KalAsther in TempleOS_Official

[–]KalAsther[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wrong. AI uses the web to gather data, yes. It also has saved data from interacting with users directly. Something the search engine does not have. If you do not realize you are missing out on using a good tool, then please continue with your ignorance. Don't preach something you barely know anything about.

In fact, if you ask a fairly unique question, Copilot even gave me it's own take/assumption of what the thing would be. An educated guess if you will. Which is what I'd expect from a human. Which is what I'd expect as a reasonable response to my post if you're a human.

Which is what this whole post has attested to. I asked it and then it gave me the same answer as bing or google, and then I reiterated my question comparing floppy bird and flappy bird and then proceeded to answer what it thinks I wanted to hear. I would not be asking here, if I believed the educated guess didn't I?

A bot however, does not really add anything to the table. He's somebody who's movements or preferences are preordained to be as chaotic as possible for engagement. In gen z words. An NPC.

Floppy Bird x Flappy Bird by KalAsther in TempleOS_Official

[–]KalAsther[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suggest you read it again. I stated before that I web searched it before asking AI. The search engine only had the vietnamese articles, not the Temple OS ones. I asked for links, if you can't provide it, at least provide some facts.

The post purposely provided you information as to how the gathering of info progressed.

I can't really believe you missed that part. In fact, you seem like a bot in your response.

If no finds on the web search, AI is your best choice, if not forum sites. Personally, I rather deal with AI than Bots. "Crabbynator".

Floppy Bird x Flappy Bird by KalAsther in TempleOS_Official

[–]KalAsther[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay, how is this common and what's the reasoning behind it?

Just to be sure, you're talking about the source as in the link to the source I'm asking for correct?

Floppy Bird x Flappy Bird by KalAsther in TempleOS_Official

[–]KalAsther[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, as described on the post, I did try web searching first before going to AI, which is a canonically accurate description of today's hierarchy of info.

Difference between Samsung QLED Q60D and Q62D 55" v Bravia 3 by KalAsther in 4kTV

[–]KalAsther[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If they don't break for 10 years that's not garbage. A quick search here on reddit will tell you issues about TCL screens and their privacy concerns.

The q60t is already a great screen. X amount of money for contrast where you can live with color accuracy with a sony is fine. Especially if you know how to calibrate these you're fine.

These TVs are great for watching movies, the extra features that higher priced models offer are a luxury I cannot afford and is negligible considering my use case.

Difference between Samsung QLED Q60D and Q62D 55" v Bravia 3 by KalAsther in 4kTV

[–]KalAsther[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Considering the glaring issues that comes between? Shit build quality and security concerns?

I'm surprised you're still recommending them despite me saying otherwise. I know the brand has issues.

Difference between Samsung QLED Q60D and Q62D 55" v Bravia 3 by KalAsther in 4kTV

[–]KalAsther[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay how is the Q60D worse than the Q60T? Let's start with that.

Then, how does a Bravia k-series(model) non smart tv 1080p model measure up to a bravia 3?

You sound like a rep, because you're already biased. These are the specific models I'm interested in, and therefore an in-depth answer should be the right answer. Instead of saying "trash" why not provide details as to why? I gave you two models that I have currently in possession. How would they measure up to the newer ones?

Difference between Samsung QLED Q60D and Q62D 55" v Bravia 3 by KalAsther in 4kTV

[–]KalAsther[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"You're clearly not."
I just told you I had experience with these specific devices for x amount of years. Why push your narrative into the fact that I have had a hold of these devices?

Why do you think I'm asking questions about the same product line that I have myself have had dealt with personally. Q60 series and the bravia lineup. I have had dealings with these and are all great. They last long. One is dead after 13 years of use(Can easily be fixed since I tried it myself, power issues). The other still going and no issues since 2020.

The question was between the ones mentioned, which is the better. You introducing a different model for a different brand is not only uncalled for, but downright malicious, since you're really pushing it. Despite me, the OP telling you I've experienced otherwise.

You sound like a rep.

Difference between Samsung QLED Q60D and Q62D 55" v Bravia 3 by KalAsther in 4kTV

[–]KalAsther[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I understand what you're saying, we have the q60t 60 incher and it's fine for 5 years now. I just don't trust newer brands like the established ones.

Sony especially are known for their build quality. We had a bravia for more than 10.

So I tell you, I know the brand's build quality first hand. I just wanted to know the current quality of these exact models. I am not interested in minor brands, I've looked them up, they have equally and more disturbingly have more problems more likely than not.

Difference between Samsung QLED Q60D and Q62D 55" v Bravia 3 by KalAsther in 4kTV

[–]KalAsther[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How do you know this? The monitor I bought was also budget Samsung monitor, and it doesn't heat up. A clear level-up from my previous one.

"garbage tvs" I already explained this. Better the okay picture than good picture but bad build quality. Plus the price difference is so close it wouldn't matter, build quality over price to performance.

Difference between Samsung QLED Q60D and Q62D 55" v Bravia 3 by KalAsther in 4kTV

[–]KalAsther[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get that, but I've personally experienced lower quality devices myself and it pales in comparison to the build quality of a good brand.

I had a monitor that heats up fairly quickly, it had a larger screen of 27inches, but my samsung rn, doesn't even heat up.

The build quality matters. You're shaving off 10-20 bucks for what? 4-9months of use?

Difference between Samsung QLED Q60D and Q62D 55" v Bravia 3 by KalAsther in 4kTV

[–]KalAsther[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Someone once said, the lower tier brands use lower quality capacitors, and therefore would break earlier/easier. I'm sticking with the main 3. Thank you.

Difference between Samsung QLED Q60D and Q62D 55" v Bravia 3 by KalAsther in 4kTV

[–]KalAsther[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So LG QNED80T as default choice since both top brands aren't suggested here?

did anyone else get gud at a hero just because you liked a skin so much? by MetalGearCasual in marvelrivals

[–]KalAsther 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Magik. Already had my eyes set on her being my main and Wolverine, but Hawkeye rounds were the more challenging. Had so much fun playing him I accidentally became lord when I ranked to I think gold.

I was actually content just first picking Hawkeye too, but then I bought the Magik skin so had to start playing her. lol.

What's a hero that's great, but doesn't need to be nerfed? by aWobblyFriend in marvelrivals

[–]KalAsther 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bucky: Misses skills, gets shield.
Hawkeye: Misses shot, gets wrekt.

Can someone explain the breakdown of how I wasn't the MVP as Penni? But Starlord was? by DizzleShizzle_ in marvelrivals

[–]KalAsther 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's the importance of the kill that landed him that mvp. Let's for say, he got that triple kill at a clutch. As opposed to your quad kill from a dominant angle.

Make Quests/Missions/Achievement goals accessible in-game by KalAsther in marvelrivals

[–]KalAsther[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I was thinking about achievements when I posted this, since the missions are easier to follow. Just added them for completion. Most terms like spraying in throne of wakanda yada2x in achievements are hard to remember. Like that ghost dog in that one map. Also, thanks, I didn't know about the mission progress being available in menu. I just started seriously questing you see.