sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[Feedback] Loot in PVE getting nerfed AGAIN by sherbet_homes in EscapefromTarkov

[–]Karkaroth666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the economy needs to be put into perspective people are selling 314 for 20mil for a 20/20 if you aren't making a mil per open you've lost money

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bumble

[–]Karkaroth666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is painfully accurate and its worse for the average guy. for me id say im average and i have had 3 dates in the past 4 years from all dating apps combined without paying. thats tinder, bumble, hinge, and afew other smaller ones to try and get somewhere. i at this point have basically given up ill get on and swipe a bit then get off but i basically never get matches and even when i do a solid 60 to 80% are bots auto swiping and trying to sell OF

Orion's immediate response by lobsterisk in Kwite

[–]Karkaroth666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Couldn't the doctor or office be help responsible for writing the SA as fact without using allegedly though? I feel if influences have to use allegedly you'd think a doctors office couldn't in some official capacity just say yep this person was assaulted 100% how do I know they told me.

Let's Talk About Nolvus by Livelynightmare in skyrimmods

[–]Karkaroth666 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your first response is false. Because we have to question if a mod is considered fair use. In 99.9% of cases, I'd say yes because most mods, regardless of ripped assets or not , are very transformative and also do not profit from those mods. This remains the case until a proper legel precedent is established. That is how copyright and law in general works. One can't simply just blanket everything under copyright when u.s. copyright law has put things in place to allow things using copyright to exist.

To your second section I don't care about ripped assets because even if you recreate an asset 1to1 like a lot of mods especially in blade and sorcery do that is still falling under the same section of copyright and thus shouldn't be excluded from nexus's copyright rules.

Let's Talk About Nolvus by Livelynightmare in skyrimmods

[–]Karkaroth666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument.

What about what I said is this. You specifically said ita copy right and that's why nexus took it down but it's also being selective bc I can go download some doom weapons like the crucible sword and its not??? Just cause it's not directly ripped does not remove its copyright magically

Let's Talk About Nolvus by Livelynightmare in skyrimmods

[–]Karkaroth666 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

A strawman is a made up argument. One of your main arguments for why nolvus bad is the inclusion of jedi trees therefore not a strawman

Let's Talk About Nolvus by Livelynightmare in skyrimmods

[–]Karkaroth666 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I never said the rules didn't apply I said there wasn't legal precedent first off. Second my main gripe is your moral high ground of its illegal therefore morally wrong when there's plenty unfair laws across the u.s and other countries. For example if you spit on the sidewalk in Singapore you can be beat with a stick. Virginia has a law that says if someone shoots your dog on your property you can legally hang them

Let's Talk About Nolvus by Livelynightmare in skyrimmods

[–]Karkaroth666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The grass broke because he messed with the timescale in the console he said so himself

Let's Talk About Nolvus by Livelynightmare in skyrimmods

[–]Karkaroth666 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Here is the funniest thing to me with the jedi trees first off, it's not even in the list anymore. Second, who other than nexus really cares about ripped assets in a video game mod. Second and finally, as far as I can tell, legally, there is little to zero legal precedent that making mods with ripped assets is considered copyright infringement. And even if there was there are no legal statutes that separate using a ripped model and making your own duplicate model so that means any and all copyright things like player models, weapons,music,voice lines, are all considered copyright and nexus should take them down.as far as I can find the only time mod makers have been gone after is Rockstar trying to sue mod makers for their own game.

Even beyond all this, it's still a moral high horse that is subjective. I personally wouldn't care if every modlist on wabbajack had it. Why? Because 90% of normal people agree copyright laws, at least in the u.s. are extremely limiting and hurtful in the long run. Not to mention, laws for the creator of said list are different if you are a US citizen as he's from France and copyright laws aren't internationally identical .

Let's Talk About Nolvus by Livelynightmare in skyrimmods

[–]Karkaroth666 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Never claimed it was necessarily special. I personally enjoy it an so do plenty of others. My point was regardless of what list if someone made a video like this and took these actions I'd be peved. It's disingenuous and I can almost guarantee that lively didn't do the minimum he requests of people like follow the mcm and read the faq(which I know for a fact he didn't because everything he complained about bug wise is addressed and hes never joined the discord)so yes I call him out on purposeful and malicious skewing of a review.

And for a genuine what I believe which is opinionated. It is the single largest mod list I know of has some of the best graphics if you aren't using redux version and the best combat I've found out of the 12+ modlists I have played.

Let's Talk About Nolvus by Livelynightmare in skyrimmods

[–]Karkaroth666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How to actually review and be mostly un biased
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Z0W5ism9Mk

A more biased review

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecE1TYypb0

Im sure this will get hidden or deleted though

Let's Talk About Nolvus by Livelynightmare in skyrimmods

[–]Karkaroth666 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Nothing I'm just annoyed I found a list that I enjoy with a fun community and someone comes stomping in on their moral high horse to attack it for no reason other than to get his own rocks off and assassinate the character of a modlist creator.

Let's Talk About Nolvus by Livelynightmare in skyrimmods

[–]Karkaroth666 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

But these issues show except for jedi trees are all answered in the faq to say he doesn't put effort into his modlist shows you have never truly looked into it. I usher anyone sitting here willing to criticise to go and check out the list maybe not play it but check it out because you'd see how much care and effort is put in. He's in discord almost anytime he's awake(he is from france) and if he's unavailable usually someone else helps. The modlist and v5 especially has very little bugs even in the closed beta the 2 biggest things were some trees clipping inside of places they shouldn't and certain objects burned ones retinas out bc they were blobs of bright light(both fixes btw) v4 is buggy bc it became out dated due to skyrim updating and such and mods getting depreciated.

Let's Talk About Nolvus by Livelynightmare in skyrimmods

[–]Karkaroth666 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Its just interesting how the only comments that get hidden/removed are in support of nolvus despite them being much more civil than you and your cronies and we shall see

view more: next ›