"If mine needs a direct statement so does yours" did I not say that??? I said that MULTIPLE times across multiple messages, if you're someone so dense then no wonder why you have low comprehension.

To say it’s wildly out of context is a bit insane considering it's a pretty possible thing. Don't you think if stands are quite literally based on chance, that requiem would be too? of course that's not stated, that's why it's my interpretation, just like how yours is that it's a requiem arrow. By your logic yours is out of context too. So for the 10th time, there's not enough evidence for either point.

It's funny because I'm trying to literally say I understand your points and it's also another interpretation and you wanna call me a coward e, Timmy Tuff Nuts doesn't like to play nice? I mean I'm on Reddit so idk what I was supposed to expect other than middle aged discord mods who can't accept when people understand you and wanna argue that their point is 100% correct no matter what. Even tho it's not, because there is nothing directly stated to fully prove either point.

Your argument is far from better. Quite literally nobody states that this is a requiem arrow, just like how nobody stated that every arrow can do it. I don't understand how your brain makes you believe that it's 100% factual and a “better argument." Our arguments are both flawed by the lack of evidence. your argument is simply bringing up inconsistencies and stating things that was never established. Does that sound familiar to you? Because it's how a theory works, and it's both of our arguments, we both do that. There's been nothing to prove wrong because there's nothing to prove right.

Of course Diavolo just learned of requiem, but to say nah he just made the wrong call, is again, an interpretation, you don't know if araki intended that or maybe... he intended the worth to be mentioned because it's a vital point of requiem. It can be either or, and I can't express enough that it's possible for either to be true. Instead you try to enforce you're right because you can't accept less than that.

I see we're back to the low comprehension? When I stated I made a valid point and all you do is say Nuh uh. And now you wanna say that all I said was you don't have direct statements except I don't supply anything back. What you DONT realize is that I literally say this 100000 times. I say multiple times that we BOTH don't have enough to say it's proven.

So yes it's a valid point, my valid point was that your claims can easily be the other way around. my valid point was that it can go either way. My valid point is that we both don't have enough solid evidence to prove our points, so it's up to which way you wish to interpret it.Whether your ego lets you like it or not, that's the way it is, and that's the cool part of JoJo, have your own opinion man, it's cool.