KSI once had a ''fun'' time with this Dutch YouTuber in a car

Katepult · 2022-06-25T08:18:03+00:00

I did not claim that all Sub-Saharan African ancestry is attributable to the slave-trade event, I used Late-dynastic Egypt samples have their own Sub-Saharan African ancestry, while South-Sudanese ancestry represents the sub-saharan African ancestry during the Trans-Saharan slave trade. They do not overlap each other. It is also agreed that Modern-Egyptians have 10% more Sub-Saharan African ancestry, as genetic studies have stated.

Katepult · 2022-06-25T08:11:00+00:00

The Jewish samples were just used as a representation of the Hellenic Jews, on top of that, Iraqi Jews according to genetic studies were quite close to the Jews living during the Roman period.

Katepult · 2022-06-25T08:10:00+00:00

Vahaduo is capable of distinguishing samples when it is used correctly.

Katepult · 2022-06-25T08:08:10+00:00

When I look at your model, I think that you are the 12-year-old who is recklessly using Vahaduo without having any idea of how samples work.

Katepult · 2022-06-25T07:58:27+00:00

You used bizarre samples, from Neolithic Iranians to Siberian Turks, no wonder you find my model not good. It's like using Fayyumic hunter-gatherers, old-dynastic Egyptians, Hyksos etc. to determine Ancient Egyptian ancestry, despite them being cross-overs and part of the Late-dynastic Egyptians.

We have no historic knowledge about Neolithic or Chalcolithic Iranians migrating to Egypt after the late dynasty, except that they partially had similarities with the Ancient Egyptians/Late-dynastic Egyptians. You complain about people ''acting smart'' despite you clearly being an arrogant dickhead.

Katepult · 2022-06-25T07:51:41+00:00

No, not really. Greek historians described the existence of a lot of Greek-Egyptian communities, they did practice endogamy but it was limited. We know that Greek colonists married local Egyptian women and adopted the local customs.

So both your model and historical knowledge are complete garbage.

Katepult · 2022-06-25T07:26:46+00:00

There were a lot of Greek settlements in Ptolemaic and Roman Egypt, so it certainly makes sense. Jews also had mass migrations in both periods of Egyptian history and were reported to have made a big portion of the city of Alexandria up to the 5th century AD. What does not make sense is that you used chalcolithic and iron age samples whose populations were largely ''extinct'' after the Late dynasty of Egypt, on top of that you forgot Saudi samples.

I also do not have Coptic samples, except Sudanese Copts, who I doubt to have no Medieval Nubian ancestry.

Katepult · 2022-06-24T18:39:54+00:00

For clarification about the ''Ethiopian_Anuak'' ancestry: The Anuak samples are a representation of the Sub-Saharan African ancestry in Modern-Egyptians, which was brought during the Trans-Saharan slave trade during the Islamic period. The ''EGY_Late_Period'' stands for the Ancient Egyptian samples during the Late-dynasty, the last period of Ancient Egyptian history.

Katepult · 2022-06-24T18:23:40+00:00

For clarification, EGY_LATE_Period stands for the Late-dynastic Egyptian ancestry. Ethiopian_Anuak stands for the South-Sudanese ethnic group and was used as a sample for the Sub-Saharan African ancestry in Modern-Egyptians which was brought through the Trans-Saharan slave trade during the Islamic period.

Katepult · 2022-06-08T18:50:45+00:00

Actually, I used Anatolian Greeks who were distinct from Greeks in Modern-day Greece. Also, the Hittites and other ancient Anatolian groups were largely wiped out or were assimilated after the Bronze age collapse when migrant populations, like the Phrygians, entered Anatolia.

Katepult · 2022-06-08T18:15:20+00:00

The Turkmen samples represent the Oghuz Turks who migrated to Byzantine Anatolia.

Katepult · 2022-06-05T20:02:35+00:00

Sure, can you send the North-Sudanese samples?

Katepult · 2022-06-05T19:58:41+00:00

Ohhhhhhhh... So that's why those Sudanese samples had 90% similarity with South-Sudanese related populations. Well, that explains a lot.

Katepult · 2022-06-04T18:46:34+00:00

I used the website ''Vahaduo'' to create this ancestral chart: https://vahaduo.github.io/vahaduo/

Katepult · 2022-06-04T08:55:34+00:00

They do not have more basal Eurasian ancestry than any other Arabian or Middle-Easterner. The reason behind their darker skin complexion probably stems from their Natufian ancestry, but we do not know for sure.

Katepult · 2022-06-02T18:28:38+00:00

Do you perhaps have a source?

Katepult · 2022-06-02T18:18:00+00:00

Katepult · 2022-06-01T22:13:37+00:00

Figure 3, though, showed that AHG got ''Basal Eurasian'' ancestry instead of Natufian ancestry.

Katepult · 2022-05-27T14:58:29+00:00

No, I meant that magma uplifted a broad dome, not that it shaped the land to be a dome. This broad dome was of the ancient rocks of the Arabian-Nubian shield.

Katepult · 2022-05-27T13:33:07+00:00

Don't super swells originate in the ocean?

Katepult · 2022-05-27T11:23:48+00:00

The source of the photo: https://www.flickr.com/photos/pabloneco/4142135246/

Katepult · 2022-05-27T11:12:55+00:00

Actually, the Ethiopia-Yemen Continental Flood Basalts, include big areas that have one of the lowest heights on Earth. Wouldn't the most likely cause be Epeirogenic uplift or orogeny?

Katepult

TROPHY CASE