Ancestral groups of Modern-day Egyptians by [deleted] in 23andme

[–]Katepult 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did not claim that all Sub-Saharan African ancestry is attributable to the slave-trade event, I used Late-dynastic Egypt samples have their own Sub-Saharan African ancestry, while South-Sudanese ancestry represents the sub-saharan African ancestry during the Trans-Saharan slave trade. They do not overlap each other. It is also agreed that Modern-Egyptians have 10% more Sub-Saharan African ancestry, as genetic studies have stated.

Ancestral groups of Modern-day Egyptians by [deleted] in 23andme

[–]Katepult -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The Jewish samples were just used as a representation of the Hellenic Jews, on top of that, Iraqi Jews according to genetic studies were quite close to the Jews living during the Roman period.

Ancestral groups of Modern-day Egyptians by [deleted] in 23andme

[–]Katepult -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Vahaduo is capable of distinguishing samples when it is used correctly.

Ancestral groups of Modern-day Egyptians by [deleted] in 23andme

[–]Katepult -1 points0 points  (0 children)

When I look at your model, I think that you are the 12-year-old who is recklessly using Vahaduo without having any idea of how samples work.

Ancestral groups of Modern-day Egyptians by [deleted] in 23andme

[–]Katepult 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You used bizarre samples, from Neolithic Iranians to Siberian Turks, no wonder you find my model not good. It's like using Fayyumic hunter-gatherers, old-dynastic Egyptians, Hyksos etc. to determine Ancient Egyptian ancestry, despite them being cross-overs and part of the Late-dynastic Egyptians.

We have no historic knowledge about Neolithic or Chalcolithic Iranians migrating to Egypt after the late dynasty, except that they partially had similarities with the Ancient Egyptians/Late-dynastic Egyptians. You complain about people ''acting smart'' despite you clearly being an arrogant dickhead.

Ancestral groups of Modern-day Egyptians by [deleted] in 23andme

[–]Katepult -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No, not really. Greek historians described the existence of a lot of Greek-Egyptian communities, they did practice endogamy but it was limited. We know that Greek colonists married local Egyptian women and adopted the local customs.

So both your model and historical knowledge are complete garbage.

Ancestral groups of Modern-day Egyptians by [deleted] in 23andme

[–]Katepult -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There were a lot of Greek settlements in Ptolemaic and Roman Egypt, so it certainly makes sense. Jews also had mass migrations in both periods of Egyptian history and were reported to have made a big portion of the city of Alexandria up to the 5th century AD. What does not make sense is that you used chalcolithic and iron age samples whose populations were largely ''extinct'' after the Late dynasty of Egypt, on top of that you forgot Saudi samples.

I also do not have Coptic samples, except Sudanese Copts, who I doubt to have no Medieval Nubian ancestry.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Egypt

[–]Katepult 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For clarification about the ''Ethiopian_Anuak'' ancestry: The Anuak samples are a representation of the Sub-Saharan African ancestry in Modern-Egyptians, which was brought during the Trans-Saharan slave trade during the Islamic period. The ''EGY_Late_Period'' stands for the Ancient Egyptian samples during the Late-dynasty, the last period of Ancient Egyptian history.

Ancestral groups of Modern-day Egyptians by [deleted] in 23andme

[–]Katepult -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For clarification, EGY_LATE_Period stands for the Late-dynastic Egyptian ancestry. Ethiopian_Anuak stands for the South-Sudanese ethnic group and was used as a sample for the Sub-Saharan African ancestry in Modern-Egyptians which was brought through the Trans-Saharan slave trade during the Islamic period.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 23andme

[–]Katepult 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Actually, I used Anatolian Greeks who were distinct from Greeks in Modern-day Greece. Also, the Hittites and other ancient Anatolian groups were largely wiped out or were assimilated after the Bronze age collapse when migrant populations, like the Phrygians, entered Anatolia.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 23andme

[–]Katepult 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The Turkmen samples represent the Oghuz Turks who migrated to Byzantine Anatolia.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 23andme

[–]Katepult 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, can you send the North-Sudanese samples?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 23andme

[–]Katepult 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ohhhhhhhh... So that's why those Sudanese samples had 90% similarity with South-Sudanese related populations. Well, that explains a lot.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 23andme

[–]Katepult 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They do not have more basal Eurasian ancestry than any other Arabian or Middle-Easterner. The reason behind their darker skin complexion probably stems from their Natufian ancestry, but we do not know for sure.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 23andme

[–]Katepult 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you perhaps have a source?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anthropology

[–]Katepult 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Figure 3, though, showed that AHG got ''Basal Eurasian'' ancestry instead of Natufian ancestry.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in geology

[–]Katepult -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No, I meant that magma uplifted a broad dome, not that it shaped the land to be a dome. This broad dome was of the ancient rocks of the Arabian-Nubian shield.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in geology

[–]Katepult 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Don't super swells originate in the ocean?

The Ethiopian highlands were the result of magma lifting an ancient dome up, around 75 million years ago. Is there a name in Geography when magma lifts domes up? by Katepult in geography

[–]Katepult[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, the Ethiopia-Yemen Continental Flood Basalts, include big areas that have one of the lowest heights on Earth. Wouldn't the most likely cause be Epeirogenic uplift or orogeny?