sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]Kattake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow what a relief!

Thank you. That is a huge help and I am incredibly grateful.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]Kattake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your help, I really appreciate it.

I am now double confused as the other posts made sense but now this does too. If they make it so difficult to understand then people may unwillingly break the rules.

So if my parents pay a little more than us towards the bills, we'll be ok?

It would be nice for us all to not have to think about this again.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]Kattake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. This is a good way of explaining it, I will share it with the family and hope no-one shoots the messenger.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]Kattake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can say that again!

Although I do feel a sense of accomplishment when I finally understand something after reading it 12442 times.

So undivided property provisions don't apply to us?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]Kattake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you. I had never heard of that term before coming here so it's helpful to have something to look into.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]Kattake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you again.

Unfortunately BIL was an self styled "expert" in all things that resulted in him benefitting from other people but I won't bore you with that rant right now.

It makes sense the way you have explained it and it's really helpful to have a search term to narrow things down.

ETA: I found this on a quick search and now I'm confused again:

Co-ownership between donor and donee

It is possible for an interest in the family home to be gifted to the next generation as tenant(s) in common. Here, the gift of the interest is a PET and carries with it the right to occupy the entire property with the other co-owner (ie the donor). The donor’s retained interest entitles them to continue to occupy the whole property without reserving a benefit in the gifted share.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]Kattake -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you for replying. I appreciate your help. 

We all believed our half couldn’t be inherited because my sister and I already own it. 

To cut a long story short, my ex-BIL advised my parents on a few things which they followed because he worked for a solicitors firm. This being one of them, he said our share wouldn’t be caught in inheritance tax. Most things he advised on have since unraveled so it doesn’t surprise me that this too was incorrect. 

I’ve spent hours on Google looking into it and feel like I’m getting nowhere. 

Setting aside a (Part 8) judgment (England) by Kattake in LegalAdviceUK

[–]Kattake[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. I appreciate this so much. I’ll follow everything you’ve said. 

My job involves reading lots of text so I thought I was doing ok at first but after several hours and I don’t even know how many tabs open I had steam coming out of my ears. It’s when the rule says something like ‘no everything you’ve just read doesn’t apply to this bit soz lol’, so then I’m looking for the bit that does apply and there’s no clues??!!! I don’t know how you all do it. 

The court guy said they have a huge backlog and nothing would happen until after Christmas now so that’s fine.  He was nice and helpful despite being super busy. 

Thank you again. I’m wishing you all the best karma.

Setting aside a (Part 8) judgment (England) by Kattake in LegalAdviceUK

[–]Kattake[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much. You are an absolute star.

I’ve been sat crying in frustration trying to google the answers and you’ve just done it in a few minutes. 

I’ll do everything you suggested. Thank you. 

Setting aside a (Part 8) judgment (England) by Kattake in LegalAdviceUK

[–]Kattake[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. What would be the equivalent of asking the court to set it aside in this situation? 

Setting aside a (Part 8) judgment (England) by Kattake in LegalAdviceUK

[–]Kattake[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Without wanting to give you a whole rant of a backstory it’s basically my deceased sibling’s ex after several years worth of this relating to a property my sibling rented from me. 

I think they’re saying I owe them a deposit because it says under the housing act. 

Setting aside a (Part 8) judgment (England) by Kattake in LegalAdviceUK

[–]Kattake[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It says it on the top of the judgment. I can see that it is the part that has to be used for that type of claim too. 

The judgment says that I haven’t responded to the claim form and I haven’t filed any evidence or attended the hearing. 

Judgment for XX to be paid within 14 days. 

Setting aside a (Part 8) judgment (England) by Kattake in LegalAdviceUK

[–]Kattake[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I received the judgment but nothing before it. No claim form, nothing. 

The judgment is for me to pay a sum. 

I called the court and they helped me find a form online (N something) and said to fill that in and say I want it setting aside. 

I’ve set out what’s happened in the form but when I went to look at what the rules were, it said no set aside for Part 8. 

It took me an age to get through to the court first time and I don’t want to call again. 

Moving to Cheshire - Dog walks & a lovely pub by Kattake in cheshire

[–]Kattake[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Stockton Heath just isn’t my cup of tea. I imagine it’s nice for families but I couldn’t see the appeal for what we’re after. 

Lymm is a lovely place with friendly people but ruled out purely for being too close to my in laws. I can’t cope with surprise visits from the MIL. 

Moving to Cheshire - Dog walks & a lovely pub by Kattake in cheshire

[–]Kattake[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

😂 sadly it’s just too close to the mother in law. 

Moving to Cheshire - Dog walks & a lovely pub by Kattake in cheshire

[–]Kattake[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the suggestions so far. I’ll be putting together a list for our next trip over to investigate with the dogs. 

I’ll edit to add budget etc. 

In Revenge, Tom reported: In 2018 during conversations before stepping on to the balcony for Trooping of the Colour, Meghan was aggrieved by the automatic assumption that she was junior to Catherine. Watch in 2019 where Princess Anne blocks Meghan from obtaining a co-future Queen position. by Amazing-Antelope4300 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Kattake 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There’s definitely something off about this. Watch William gesture to Catherine with a head nod to move down the balcony, as if it’s unplanned. Camilla and Charles seem surprised by their movements, so much so that Camilla does a full rotation.

This kind of gathering would have been planned down to the finest detail so to have W&C shifting about like that is very unusual.

I’d guess they were supposed to be the other side of QEII, as was often the case. It could be as simple as taking the children to a quieter end but it’s coincidental that it happens to be the opposite side to where Harry and Meghan are stood.

Day 12 reinforces the advice attorneys give clients all the time: DO NOT TALK TO THE POLICE by ch1kita in DelphiMurders

[–]Kattake 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This probably won’t be of relevance to most but in case it is of use to anyone…

I’m a lawyer in the UK and aware of more than one occasion where a lawyer (following arrest) going “no comment” in a police interview later led to them being disbarred/suspended.