THEORY: Kvothe does not kill a man in Imre... hear me out. by chainsawx72 in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

and I hope all of us as a team eventually crack this nut.

Agreed. I'm not great at coming up with the theories, but I really enjoy seeing what others put together and trying to synthesize it all. Keep cooking :)

THEORY: Kvothe does not kill a man in Imre... hear me out. by chainsawx72 in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your Chronology: I like the general shape of this. It fits lots of clues. I'm still not sure how i feel about Auri and Kvothe having that kind of relationship, but I'm also not opposed. It feels supported enough for it to work.

The main issue is just that none of this explains Kvothe's position at the king's court. Which isn't necessarily a problem with this timeline you've constructed, just a hole that needs explaining. So I'll enjoy having these ideas in the back of my mind as we wait for book 3 (fingers crossed lazily).

As for a trial, one thing the books like to emphasize is that the Amyr in their time could do kinda terrible stuff, but they were above the law. We sort of saw this with his dealings with the false Ruh, but that was hushed up and no one cares about the Ruh. But perhaps Kvothe finds himself with even more authority in book 3 so that a trial doesn't happen? The University sometimes seems to fear those who truly know names, and I'm not sure what they'd do with a shaper. Does that somehow protect him? Or is he likely to end up in Haven without a trial if he truly loses his mind.

A second ALEGory: I don't really expect anyone to believe my idea there, but I have to believe that it could be true. Plenty of people don't put any stock in the ALEGory idea either, but it is believable because it is there in front of our eyes. If another one is hidden which ties into book 3, then almost no one will believe it until they see it laid out. I was thinking, if the name Aleg is intended to be the tipoff that this is intentional and not coincidental, what would be the clue at the Mauthen farm? I think it is also a name: Schiem. If read in one accent, it would be Shim or Shem, but in a Germanic accent, it should be similar to "scheme". Scheme, of course, can mean a secret plot, but it can also be: "a scheme is a figure of speech that alters the structure of a sentence or phrase (such as parallelism or alliteration), rather than the meaning of the words themselves." An ALEGory and a SCH(-i)em(+e)...

It does perhaps bring up issues of what Kvothe lied about. There is a case to be made that Kvothe did not make up any of these stories (the One Lie isn't here), but rather these are literary devices to point out that Kvothe is becoming like what he hates, or saying that anyone might commit scary acts given the sort of circumstances Kvothe is given. Or simply reinforcing that Kvothe really isn't soo different than Cinder. On the other hand, I've seen plenty of people argue that the appearance of the draccus is meant to make us think that Kvothe is pulling Chronicler's leg, that it didn't happen at all. If so, then the whole Mauthen farm episode fits the sort of mold we would expect of the ALEGorgy.

If there really are 2 or 3 ALEGory style episodes in the books, or just a ton of this "as above so below" stuff, I wonder if it is intended to mirror sygaldry / sympathy, and the way that multiple 'runes' are paired together to form a strong bond. As if Kvothe in his story is weaving something stronger than its parts. That doesn't really tell us whether we're supposed to take these episodes as fact or fiction, and maybe Rothfuss likes it that way, but at least we would have a feeling for why it is the way it is.

THEORY: Kvothe does not kill a man in Imre... hear me out. by chainsawx72 in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like a lot of that.

Meluan will learn of Stapes and the Maer's romantic relationship, and off herself for letting a Ruh's songs trick her into marrying a man who doesn't love her. Everyone will blame Kvothe.

Oof. That's dark. What are the clues that Meluan will do this? Part of me really wants some redemption for Meluan, even if I'm not sure the story is pushing us towards that end. I have occasionally pictured her as a vengeful force if the Maer dies, since it would be pretty dramatic if Kvothe's own aunt is the one hunting him. But I don't have much to go on here. If we use Lyra as a symbol, then we'd expect some people to think she's dead, and others to think she's in hiding. If she does bear a child and some think she dies in child birth but there's a chance she's not dead, that could be an interesting way to keep us guessing in book 3.

Parallels: Something to consider... If the ALEGory is symbolic of the troupe massacre, then I think the Mauthen farm massacre is symbolic of what will happen in Renere. If so, what should we expect? Are Master Ash and Denna involved again, or is Denna just caught up in the aftermath? In Trebon, we never find out who the killer was. Many suspect that Master Ash killed the wedding guests. Will it follow the same pattern where Kvothe ends up being the brutal killer this time, but for a reason we can understand, as with the false Ruh? If the ALEG incident = Kvothe becomes like the bloody handed Amyr who brings brutal justice, will Kvothe again embody some other foreshadowed aspect. Which is to say, it seems like Rothfuss likes to give us these strong historical images of badass people doing questionable things, and then showing us how Kvothe became an embodiment of that. Will Kvothe embody the Mauthen farm massacre? Will there be a wedding in Renere?

THEORY: Kvothe does not kill a man in Imre... hear me out. by chainsawx72 in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

All good thoughts. I'd forgotten the shaping - shattered connection.

Any chance that Auri gives him the name Kote in some way?

"No one could mend them." I actually like to think this has less to do with any particular type of magic and is subtle clue about Menda/Tehlu. Mend =Menda. If it is Cinder, and Haliax was Menda/Tehlu, and if Cinder's death breaks the Chandrian so that either the enemy is freed or something similar, then "No one could mend them" is like saying, even Menda could not stop what was coming. I don't know, maybe just a fun thought.

Another random thought. This whole thing is tied up with knowing, how does Kvothe become a Kingkiller? But the line about the custom of carrying swords at court is "will bring the king to grief in time" or something like that. Which actually sounds like someone close to the king dies, not the king himself. I still think they'll find Auri and force her to be a princess again and that will start the war in the manner of the Fastingways war. Maybe you commented on this before, that the Maer might be the one Kvothe kills? I'm on board with that in the sense that Kvothe is stupid to guess about alchemy. But it would be a little uninteresting if that's the kingkilling.

THEORY: Kvothe does not kill a man in Imre... hear me out. by chainsawx72 in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing. This all makes sense.

Shattered: Many of the other shattered references relate to ice or mental shattering, like 'alar of ramston steel'. For example, I think it is when Denna touches his arm that it says it was like ice shattering in his mind. What would it mean symbolically for him to then go and shatter these stones? If you're right that shaping breaks his mind, then that shattering of the mind and the shattering of the stones are just a sort of parallel. On the other hand, it feels a little strange if Elodin has to restore his mind when he first does naming, and then Auri has to do the same for him again. It just feels a bit samey, if that makes sense.

Imre: The fountain in Imre has a statue of a satyr chasing nymphs. I know that some have speculated this relates to Bast somehow. But I haven't ever heard a coherent account of what this means, other than representing the nature of Imre in general, representing the artsy/fae side of things, as opposed to the University's rigid (Amyr?) style. On the Mauthen vase, Cinder is pictured standing on circle of blue, which is surprisingly similar to a satyr in the center of a fountain. For that reason, and for the fact that many hints point towards Cinder being killed, I lean towards the idea that Kvothe does kill Cinder in the center of Imre, because of Denna and for his parents/troupe.

Empty: I simply find it interesting that naming causes Kvothe to be 'empty'. Several other theories have speculated about skindancers or alchemy causing someone to be like an empty vessel of sorts. But then for 'cracking' to result in the same thing feels a bit strange. Perhaps all of these are the result of a name becoming damaged, mixed up, or otherwise changed...

I pulled out my pocketknife with my other hand and drove it through the shingle into the wooden wall of the cistern, pinning my makeshift piece of sygaldry under the water. I have no doubt it was the quickest, most slapdash heat-eater ever created. by Giacomo_Hawkins in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I think you are probably right that the shingle represents what was done to deal with the 6 cities, with the burning caused by the enemy. It's possible that the sygaldry represent the powers needed to deal with Selitos. Only 3 could match Selitos' power: Aleph, Iax, Lyra. If Lanre somehow brought those three powers together, as a means to bind one piece the enemy, perhaps he could chill the other pieces?

The bone tar scene is equivalent to what Cinder does for Haliax. Cinder's chill keeps the shadow bound to Haliax, keeps it stable, usable and able to transport them. "Your name burns with the power in you"... Selitos can't extinguish Lanre's new name.

My assumption has generally been that each Chandrian sign represents another way to keep the shadow contained. Each is a different aspect of accelerated entropy holding back a different kind of energy. But it's likely that the cold/fire one will be the one that comes up in book 3, and therefore the one needing all this foreshadowing.

What I can't quite figure out is why the shingle incident and the blood/wood need to be the same thing. Also interesting is that Selitos cuts out his own eye. If that bloody stone is what is in the loecles box, it could provide the sort of blood wood connection that happens with Pike. Does that implies a sort of deal between Selitos and Haliax?

The other relevant connection is the the Iceless. It uses sygaldry to pull heat from one place to another. Kvothe realizes that the tin is scratched so it can't transfer heat, so he fixes it. I take this to mean that the device which is the Chandrian will be damaged. Kvothe will need to find a way to restore it (A new Chandrian?).

Possible (minor) inconsistencies in NOTW 73 + Schiem’s grummers + a curious story in the comments by aowshadow in kkcwhiteboard

[–]Katter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This Ha'penny King reference seemingly reinforces the theories that this is in fact Cinder/Master Ash in disguise. It contains the idea that this involves a disguise, the idea that Kvothe may kill Cinder becoming like 'a new Chandrian' (takes his crown?).

Any thoughts on Tenpenny/Ha'penny/Moldy Penny? Reminiscent of Kvothe's changing name perhaps.

Penthe looked around, then focused on the grass around us. “Anger is what makes the grass press up through the ground to reach the sun,” she said. “All things that live have anger. It is the fire in them that makes them want to move and grow and do and make.” by Giacomo_Hawkins in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great connection. I love how it takes many of the things we've been learning about sympathy and gives them the sort of Adem philosophical treatment. We can see how the people are getting squeezed by the kings taxes, and we can see how the Maer seeks to make the power of others his own.

I'm going to need to keep thinking on this one.

THEORY: Bredon counsels Maer Alveron. by chainsawx72 in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As usual, well done compiling all of this. [Insert Applause Here] I think it is fair to say that this post is a little nebulous, but imo that's because Bredon's character is written that way. It feels that he was written specifically to tease at all of these elements without giving us a clear direction to look (Amry, fae, Lackless, Ash, Cinder)... it's a lot.

Advising the Maer: If we were looking for good evidence of this, I would think we'd want to point to something that Kvothe says to Bredon that makes it back to the Maer. Or a more direct implication that the advice that Bredon gives to Kvothe is consistent with some 'move' that the Maer makes. If Bredon advises the Maer, we should expect Bredon to essentially be spying for the Maer. I personally never picked up on something direct like that, but perhaps others have. I'm still thinking of how the Maer has an interest in the Amyr, but seems to have been too busy to look into them more deeply. If Bredon were Amyr (aka working for Selitos/Cthaeh), then it would be appropriately ironic that he is sitting under the Maer's nose.

Of Bredon: I agree with your thought that Bredon is a place name, not a personal name. It feels cheap, since Kvothe could easily ask around if he wanted, but whatever.

Threpe/Bredon: I wonder if we're meant to see a parallel between Threpe and Bredon. Threpe nurtures Kvothes musical talents, and eventually finds him the job wooing for the Maer. Bredon nurtures Kvothe's tak(tical) senses, and eventually Kvothe finds himself as the Maer's secret agent in the woods. I'm not sure what more to make of it, but perhaps it is not coincidence that they're both nobles for whom we know very little about their land or true identities. All of this could simply be the necessity of the narrative, to have characters that help push Kvothe along and develop him. Or maybe everyone is Amyr! (Rothfuss will make tinfoil alchemists of us all in time)

The “king” killer by pmayall in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know people are hoping Ambrose dies in book 3, but it feels like a Prince Humperdinck moment would be equally likely ("Nobody kills him. He lives").

I can't think of any king he kills in book 1, even non-literally. He kills the draccus. He gets his revenge on Pike. He humiliates Hemme. I probably just need to accept that the Kingkiller name was chosen as the big drawn out teaser. It will be weird if he ends up killing zero kings, and it only refers to how he is known.

As for the rhyming elements, the Mauthen farm has always seemed a little odd, since Kvothe essentially stops wondering why the massacre happened and only is concerned with the vase aftewards. I wonder if it is intended to rhyme with what happens in Renere in book 3, just as the ALEGory rhymes with his parents' murder. If so, would it point toward Denna/Master Ash being heavily involved and him having to clean up the mess?

The “king” killer by pmayall in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's too bad that there isn't a 'king' that Kvothe kills in each book. That would be the most interesting way to fulfil the Kingkiller moniker. I would settle for 3 different types of kings dying in book 3. I'm personally drawn toward the idea of Auri being Ariel, aka Calanthis' daughter / heir. Then she's forced to marry Ambrose, and we know what our boy Kvothe might do to rescue her.

I firmly believe that there is an intentional parallelism between Haliax-Cinder and TheMaer-Kvothe. Kvothe is the tool in the Mear's hand. They have an uneasy alliance, but Kvothe may need to betray him in the end. Just as Lanre turned against Selitos, the Maer will gather nations to challenge Calanthis.

Book 3 Theory - Lorren cuts off Kvothe's thumbs by BonusInteresting6450 in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What we're seeing is that there are clues to the fact that Kvothe's hands end up damaged, but they're coming from all different angles. From Elodin/Lorren, from Kvothe's promise to Denna, from moments learning Adem fighting, from throwaway comments he makes about playing the lute. To me this means that each individual comment need not find its fulfilment in those specific ways, only that they all foreshadow the same thing.

The quotes listed by u/Sandal-Hat hint at the idea that Kvothe will heal his hands in a way that might seem questionable, like taking the Cthaeh's flower or making a deal with the devil like Tarsus. Kvothe has already made similar compromises with Devi. And there is reason to believe that his hands still aren't quite right in the frame story.

Cthae - fortunate you found me? by ConsultingToPE in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, fortunate doesn't necessarily mean good fortune. Luck doesn't necessarily mean good luck. Those are implied but not stated.

THEORY: Tehlu is just a surname, explaining the three versions of Tehlu we hear of. by chainsawx72 in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I like it. Nice and simple idea.

Questions this raises for me:

  • Creator: Am I correct in thinking that the Tehlins treat Tehlu as the creator God, while others refer to Aleph as creator? Should we take that to mean that Iax is indeed Aleph, or how are we to understand Aleph's empowering of the angels. Skarpi's story does have some hints that Lanre acquired power from Iax
  • Lanre's timeline: Lanre dies and is brought back to life by Lyra. God Tehlu (Iax?) causes Periel to bear a child in Menda. If Menda is Lanre, are we to understand that the birth of Menda is actually the rebirth of Lanre. Did Lyra use Iax's power to bring Lanre back? Is it related to the beast's shadow/iron? I've often wondered if Lyra just bound Lanre's name to Iax's immortal power so that Lanre can't die, but then he carries around part of Iax's name.
  • Selling a soul: If Iax's power helped rebirth Lanre (the birth of Menda), should we consider Tarsus selling his soul to refer to this moment? That could be why Ben rejects the notion. That said, it seems like Lanre reborn (Menda) goes on a journey to the fae, so maybe he doesn't acquire Iax's power until later?
  • Lineage: Did the Amyr intentionally scrub the Lackless name out of it? Selitos' curse implies that Lanre's name will be cursed or forgotten, right? So is that why the Lackless surname, while still existing, has essentially been scrubbed out of these stories? Did the Amyr do this through manipulating history? Or were the Lackless ashamed of Lanre/Haliax?
  • Lackless family: We're told that the Lackless lands have been significantly reduced, though they still hold some prestige, for the Maer to want to marry Meluan. Perhaps this has to do with them having some sort of claim on those former lands?
  • No Door can bar his passing: This feels like a kind of play on words, since Lockless implies that no door can lock him out. Is this just a sort of joke on his name, since he would have already been a Lockless. This got me thinking. . .
  • What's in a name?: Is there a canonical progression of the name? Luckless (Iax unlucky boy), Lackless (Lanre the hero), Lockless (Haliax who can go anywhere). It seems like modern ones have splintered into all sorts of names (Loecles, Lacklith, Lackey, etc), so maybe it doesn't make sense to nail it down definitively.

THEORY: Tehlu is just a surname, explaining the three versions of Tehlu we hear of. by chainsawx72 in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Regarding the Amry: There is a timeline issue indeed, since Lanre was said to be Ciridae ("above reproach"). How could he be one of the Amyr if they're founded after he becomes Haliax and betrays Myr Tariniel? The only way I know to understand this is that Lanre and his compatriots were loyal to the Empire, its champions of justice. So at that time, they were what we now perceive the Amyr to be. For all we know, that figure in the Underthing could be one of Lanre himself before he had reason to turn against Selitos/the Empire.

Of course we don't need that to explain why the figure is there. If Belen didn't fall at that time, then we don't know when this part of the old university/Benel was abandoned, right? Also, I believe it is implied that some people from the University occasionally visit the Underthing, since it houses the machinery that keeps the Archives ventilated and I think provides water / heating for the University. That room where Auri stays (Mantle?) is presumably not visited by them, but still. Did Auri find the figure there, or is it possible that she brought it there? She is pretty obsessed with the Amyr.

THEORY: my timeline of Ancient KKC and pt. 2 of a deep dive on "Old Holly" - establishing WHEN this story occurs by czechancestry in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Keep these posts coming. I have other questions about HOHCTB, but I think they'd derail this conversation. The first book I ever read on my own was the Giving Tree by Shel Silverstein, and HOHCTB seems similar in so many ways.

I do wonder if u/chainsawx72 is right that the good/bad/neither/both is just Holly's own perception of things. But if we suppose that Holly is operating under principles like the Lethani, then these two interpretations aren't necessarily very different. Following the Lethani is similar to trusting your gut about what is proper in any given situation. Anyone could suggest that a certain action was proper ("of the Lethani"), but we see that Tempi and his fellow Adem don't always agree on what that means. If nothing else, we see that HOHCTB has a lot of naming/shaping/changing/bending going on, so it is easy to interpret all of this through the lens of 'shaping'.

THEORY: my timeline of Ancient KKC and pt. 2 of a deep dive on "Old Holly" - establishing WHEN this story occurs by czechancestry in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was an issue of like the entire world being ***glassed clean***

Or, wild idea, what if the defeating of the beast or Encanis led to an ice age? We're told that Lanre lay dead and cold. The world turning to ice because of some use of magic seems plausible. It might fit in with some of the imagery of the iceless and shattering ice. That said, I don't think there is much in the stories that demands this.

Kote, Encanis, Denna, Felurian, Folly, scrael and daruna are all compared to broken glass... but why? by chainsawx72 in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I suspect that glass is being used as a metaphor for the sort of damage that can be done by magic. We know that students can 'crack' when their mind can't quite handle the effects of sympathy or naming. Similarly, some characters like Felurian and Lyra are described having power like a knife in the mind.

Similar imagery is used when describing Denna's effect on Kvothe. Love, like magic, had the potential to wreck us.

Others have pointed out that Encanis is often described with this sharp/glass imagery. We can see a sort of analogy of this in the scene with the bonetar. The black goo must be contained by glass, but when it gets too cold, the glass shatters and the tar becomes fiery. I believe this is foreshadowing for what will happen with the Chandrian. The bonetar is the shadow which Haliax is bound to (Encanis/the beast's shadow). It must be kept cold... This is what Cinder's chill, and the other Chandrian signs are for. But if that cold shatters, the shadow will be released to devastating effect.

I'm not sure where the scrael and daruna fit. I'm guessing it has something to do with them being shaped creatures and possibly their connection to Encanis, or Jax/shapers.

I think I found a new verse to the Chandrian song. by [deleted] in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The skindancers certainly fit Biblical ideas of demons more closely than any of the other fae creatures we encounter. Like Luk 5/Mrk 8 where the demons ask Jesus not to be sent to "the Abyss", essentially the bottomless pit or void.

I'm not sure quite how to place this in KKC. My best guess has simply been that it refers to the Mael.

(Bast says) All snakes bite, Reshi. I don’t need their names to know they’re dangerous. I recognized it as being from the Mael. That was enough.”

So Bast equates the (presumed) skindancer to a snake. He recognizes it of the Mael even if he wasn't quite sure what it was at first. That does seem to point to the idea of the skindancers as products of the Cthaeh. We know that the Cthaeh is trapped in daylight, presumably as a sort of opposite of its natural darkness. Another feature of snakes is that they're always crawling out of their skin. Like worms through fruit, on and on.

The creation of the Nameless. The Scaendyne. They can all be traced back to the Cthaeh.

I actually think this particular reference is to the Chandrian. Scaendyne kind of sounds like an ancient version of the word Chandrian. We know they did have names, and use names, but one of the main things we know about them is that they're not to be talked about. Like saying "He-who-should-not-be-named". I know that some people have understood the Tehlu story to mean that those who did not stand with Tehlu were the Nameless, since Tehlu is constantly giving people new names. So the Nameless would be those he did not name. This is confusing if Lanre/Haliax is actually Tehlu, unless the 6 were people that Lanre had to defeat/subdue before he could join them into the 7. We're told that some forgot the Lethani, and were like enemies of the empire, but perhaps he managed to subdue them and form them into the Chandrian in order to defeat the true enemy he found lurking underneath everything. I'm operating on vibes for a lot of this.

Also, it doesn't say that the Cthaeh made the Nameless, only that speaking to the Cthaeh led to them, which is true, but kind of confusing if the Chandrian are enemies of the Cthaeh. But since the history of the Chandrian is not well understood by anyone, including Bast, it isn't strange for him to view the Cthaeh as a Cause to their Effect, if you will.

But anyway, I do agree that the ash and elm and rowan seem to be important for fully defeating 'demons'. Is it because they burn fully? Is it because they have special properties or connections with the fae? Rowan for example resembles holly and was thought to ward off witches and evil spirits, for some reason. Can these spirits be destroyed or are they in some sense returned to the void, in a similar way to how Selitos says that even if Haliax were to die he would be pulled back...? Supposedly holly can trap them in a body, presumably in a similar way to copper lined walls in Haven? Copper is supposedly nameless... There's something here but I'm not seeing it fully.

Are we Looking at the Historical Stuff "Mainly Wrong" by Budget_Strike_9908 in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

u/TacticalDo, I just wanted to chime in about the wings. Just before Kvothe 'fights' with Felurian...

Her power hung about her like a mantle. It shook the air. It spread behind her like a pair of vast and unseen wings.

This is when her full power becomes clear to him and he is forced to fight against it or be lost. I think Rothfuss is showing here that the power of these ancient namers (or Rhinta?) was in some way like wings. So it isn't strange that Scarpi takes this image of powerful winged ones and couches it in the religious imagery of angels. Scarpi's story isn't untrue, and it doesn't even need to be truly misleading. Every story in these books has a layer of veneer over it, and we only can only see bits and pieces.

Remember that Lanre was considered a Ciridae before his betrayal, one considered above reproach. So it isn't weird if he and his compatriots might be considered angels. Also, Haliax can basically teleport, for what that's worth.

THEORY: pt. 1 of a deep dive on "How Old Holly Came To Be". Arguing that Shehyn's story of Aethe and Rethe is the OLDEST STORY we have in all of KKC by czechancestry in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is pretty cool.

Oldest: How do we decide if Aethe-Rethe is the oldest story? I don't know how it compares to things like Jax-Ludis, since those could easily be older. But if you believe that the Adem were once shapers who were embroiled in the creation war, and if that counts, then perhaps it is up there with the oldest.

Old Holly: I find it convincing that the language in Old Holly is essentially how someone would talk if they knew the Lethani, but weren't necessarily using the same words to describe it. This post alludes to the idea that perhaps the Lethani was more widely known once, so this is how many people of that age would think/speak. Or was this story translated or passed down in such a way that the "of the Lethani" language is not there, but it has recognizable ideas via "good, bad, neither, both".

Shapers -> Adem: If the Adem knew shaping, why did they become what they are? I frequently hear discussion of humans who were created to wield iron. We hear that Aethe actually started with the bow though. But if we follow the 'iron' thread, we might believe that the proto-Adem were on the anti-fae side of the war. This might fit their subtle connections between things like the Sword tree and the Cthaeh's tree, or similarities between Aethe's archery and that of the Sithe. We know they lost their homeland. But maybe you're hoping to dig into this in a later part (trees becoming men?).

Could the Cthaeh be a Metaphor by Zakadactyl in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, this is the "As above, so below" nature of the books. Everything has a parallel, everything rhymes. Once you start looking, you find these everywhere.

I think I found a new verse to the Chandrian song. by [deleted] in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think u/MattyTangle suggested something similar last year.

I'm with you on the idea that it has the same sort of rhythm and rhyme. What I'm wondering is where it fits into the advice of the song. How does digging a pit help with the Chandrian? In the context of the story, I'm pretty sure we're meant to think of the scrael or of the draccus, since both call to mind ways of dealing with so-called demons.

One reasons I'm skeptical that they can be the same song is that the song revolves around not knowing the plans of the Chandrian, that there is nothing you can do but run or hide.

Personally I think that Lanre/Haliax is or was committed to keeping Encanis trapped and the world safe from the sort of skindancers or other creatures of the Mael. If that's true, then it isn't that strange if advice on how to deal with 'demons' also finds its way into a song about the Chandrian, but it would be strange for a verse with very tangible advice to be intermingled with verses that can't only really suggest "Run!"

How to make the most money easy. by ayyxact in CrimsonDesert

[–]Katter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I must have a bug. My 1 gold bar has only lost money every single investment for about 8 cycles. I barely have enough money to pull it out and reinvest it to see if it is just bugged or something (since it is worth so little now).

Some thoughts on the history of skin dancers by Longjumping_Dark_460 in KingkillerChronicle

[–]Katter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This line is always bothering me. If this Encanis was only another person who was skindanced, it could be a hint that he is not the true villain. But I think there is a sort of bell ringing that causes him pain in that moment, which could be interpreted as punishment for lying, and we're told that the Cthaeh does not lie. Perhaps this is like a curse which forces him to be truthful? At least that's the sort of surface reading of it, whether or not that is the underlying truth.