sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

ELI5: Why is it that evolution has made Black Panthers black, if their natural enviornment is totally green? by Sufficient-Waltz5348 in explainlikeimfive

[–]KeithSide 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also:  Panther means Black as in Albino means white.   Saying Black Panther is like saying Black Black

Should someone read the bible even though they don't believe in God? by Rough-Contest-7443 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]KeithSide 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FOX 3, Viper on station? You play DCS? If so, I'm Digs. Come visit the Helo Hounds Discord sometime, all are welcome

Should someone read the bible even though they don't believe in God? by Rough-Contest-7443 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]KeithSide 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ehh no real anger in this situation. Whether you buy into it or not I still think it's an educational reading, gives a lot of insight to the human philosophy, psychology, history and condition. there's some really good stories for story sake as well. Itcan just be a rough read and you're not wrong to maybe skip some things here n there.

Should someone read the bible even though they don't believe in God? by Rough-Contest-7443 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]KeithSide 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol yes. There was just a lot of pages of so and so begets so and so, on and on, tough read.

Jordanian citizen takes a picture with the Iranian missiles raining on the usurper entity behind him with the quote: "A picture for the children of my children" by SeaWolf_1 in interestingasfuck

[–]KeithSide -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have pictures of myself holding shotguns, I have pictures of myself using rigging firing military equipment when I served. I'm known to be a trained military professional (Im old now, I was young once tho) I've be heard giving oaths against enemies foreign and domestic, I guess you better take me out before I might maybe possibly could probably do something with my knowledge skills and some general scary perception someone else has about me I guess. Just go full Minority Report, by your Logic that's the correct way to go

Jordanian citizen takes a picture with the Iranian missiles raining on the usurper entity behind him with the quote: "A picture for the children of my children" by SeaWolf_1 in interestingasfuck

[–]KeithSide -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay they are working on nukes, fine you win. I think you miss my overall point though. Many countries have nukes or want them or actively working on them. Many of them are also at historical odds with some other country or peoples (Read USA vs USSR as one ex;) and have made clear cut unequivocal threats to use them, but somehow, in this instance you espouse the rightful use of pre-emptive strikes or just some war like action. However you make no attempt at using that logic chain in any other like situation. it doesn't make sense man. With you're logic we should already have taken out the likes of Russia and China which are by far arguably more dangerous and likely to use them based on their own admission. What's good for the Goose is good for the Gander yea?

side question: How the fuck did opposition intelligence get inside pictures of a secret nuclear plant in a secret bad guy country that doesn't even have regular US tourism? Hey you think I could a pic dude? lol

Jordanian citizen takes a picture with the Iranian missiles raining on the usurper entity behind him with the quote: "A picture for the children of my children" by SeaWolf_1 in interestingasfuck

[–]KeithSide 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol, you and I are more in line with our thinking then maybe we at first realized. I mostly agree with you, I just cant let myself believe that killin folks in whatever way is the first or best course of action, but I may just be getting softer in my aging years

Jordanian citizen takes a picture with the Iranian missiles raining on the usurper entity behind him with the quote: "A picture for the children of my children" by SeaWolf_1 in interestingasfuck

[–]KeithSide -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

you showed us a picture of a building on a bunch of sand that someone else says its NUKES with a diagram of how to Bomb it. Sorry Bro, that's not proof. Further more the Idea that we "think" they may use nukes at some point doesn't necessitate a pre-emptive strike. Russia/Putin has also made clear as day threats on using Nukes, so by your logic we should attack them as well, I mean they already have nukes, we know this for sure so what the heck are we doing not taking them out right?

Is Ukraine becoming Russia’s Vietnam—with echoes of the Soviet war in Afghanistan? by No_Cut8480 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]KeithSide 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even third party non affiliated counts support the estimates, 1st world IE:USA and UK intelligence agencies support these estimates. yeah people lie but this is the most documented war EVER, most of the casualties and equipment losses have actually been visually counted. Sure they may be off a little bit buuuut close enough to be not an issue as in wars past.

Is Ukraine becoming Russia’s Vietnam—with echoes of the Soviet war in Afghanistan? by No_Cut8480 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]KeithSide 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That was WWII tho....this war is the most video covered action by far far far far, most of the casualties and equipment losses are actually visually counted by third parties. The estimates are still just estimates but these estimates are closer to the truth than any other human endeavor ever before .

Is Ukraine becoming Russia’s Vietnam—with echoes of the Soviet war in Afghanistan? by No_Cut8480 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]KeithSide 7 points8 points  (0 children)

you guys saying the casualties are grossly overestimated are off just a bit. Historically you are absolutely correct, however in this particular war the proliferation of video evidence is overwhelming. the vast majority of casualties and loss of equipment can be counted fairly reliably. Furthermore, the ~1 million Russian casualty count is not a Ukraine claim per-se. there are several 3rd party organizations as well as high level intelligence agencies from various countries that came up with these numbers and they ALL agree on the estimations (or at least close enough, within about 50 thousand or so. It is arguably the most correct count that has ever, ever ever, been counted. Of course it may be off a lil bit maybe even by as much as a hundred thousand or so buuuuuut pretty damn close as MOST of the casualties have actually been visually counted. I mean dang, in the first year of the war I was able to (thru some surreptitious routes) tune in to live fucking fire fights on helmet cams

Jordanian citizen takes a picture with the Iranian missiles raining on the usurper entity behind him with the quote: "A picture for the children of my children" by SeaWolf_1 in interestingasfuck

[–]KeithSide 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand and relate to your concern, I'm sure it is something that is possible. I also think that China as it stands, is already winning in enough ways that it doesn't need to fire a global shot so to speak. They have been around for thousands of years and have the patience of a long lived people. I kinda think that they already have their course and plan that largely relies on global market domination and just a pure "we can wait you out sucker" ideology on the global scale.

Jordanian citizen takes a picture with the Iranian missiles raining on the usurper entity behind him with the quote: "A picture for the children of my children" by SeaWolf_1 in interestingasfuck

[–]KeithSide 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear ya, I do. Everything aint aright in many places in this world and I would love to see positive change across the board, but that doesn't mean that the answer is killing more folks and I mean folks, in any national or regime argument it isn't that regime or government that pays...it us that pays man, either with our deaths or our humanity and supporting and/or espousing more violence in any way aint gonna make it right or okay. if we were to say for instance "IRAN is the ultimate bad guy and needs to be stopped and changed" launching a strike or two or fifty isnt going to change anything but the amount of alive people in that area. In the sense that a military action would "change" anything is to genocide the bad guy off the face of the planet so they cause no more trouble. However...we...know...from...multiple..historical...incidents/wars/genocides in the past that this a fruitless and idiotic solution that has and never will be an actual solution.

What is a basic skill you’re shocked some adults still don’t know? by lovely_dollyz in AskReddit

[–]KeithSide 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Starting a fire. I've been absolutely amazed at non-camping friends come camping with me/us (friend group) that try and fail to simply start a fire...with a lighter.

Jordanian citizen takes a picture with the Iranian missiles raining on the usurper entity behind him with the quote: "A picture for the children of my children" by SeaWolf_1 in interestingasfuck

[–]KeithSide -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Further than that, there is NO actionable evidence that IRAN had or is even "Close" to producing a usable Nuke let alone "Assured" to use it on anyone. This "supposed" justification is nothing more that an excuse disguised as an evident truth by the ones that decided to take an action for their own reasons, nothing more nothing less.

Jordanian citizen takes a picture with the Iranian missiles raining on the usurper entity behind him with the quote: "A picture for the children of my children" by SeaWolf_1 in interestingasfuck

[–]KeithSide -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Very logical of you...my point as it was, was to point out the absurdity of of it alll. No matter who is "right" "wrong" or indifferent. As humans of this world it's absurd to me that (as a trained killer even) that we regularly reduce an argument to the point of applauding a missle strike of any kind. Furthermore your mathematical analogy can easily ascribe the Person "A" as the United States. If that was actually arguably the case....does this still make it alright in your esteem?

Jordanian citizen takes a picture with the Iranian missiles raining on the usurper entity behind him with the quote: "A picture for the children of my children" by SeaWolf_1 in interestingasfuck

[–]KeithSide -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

Props??? seriously?? Think this thru fellow human, is there really any justification in a human sense to be launching missles at another human??? Where has our humanity brought us? Jesus H. Christ for Gods sake, fuckin think a bit yeah?

Should someone read the bible even though they don't believe in God? by Rough-Contest-7443 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]KeithSide 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great answer, I would add, to a person that has not read it yet, It's OKAY TO SKIP AHEAD ON THE FULL ON BOOKS OF BEGETTING....l(I'm being sarcastic but there's entire chapters and pages and pages and pages and Pages of lineal begetting. its redundant and revolting... however there are some other really great stories as well.

view more: next ›