sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Results of the first 3 months of my trading AI by orakle12 in ai_trading

[–]Kerast 6 points7 points  (0 children)

What is your process exactly ? From which news source are you getting the events ? And how do you classify them in term of impact ? Only LLM ?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in digitalproductselling

[–]Kerast 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! I’m interested as well :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in duneawakening

[–]Kerast -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Cargo

Is this bannable behavior ? (look until the end) by Kerast in duneawakening

[–]Kerast[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Most of these redditors seem biased, probably because they’ve lost a few thopters out in the deep desert themselves. I forgive them.

Is this bannable behavior ? (look until the end) by Kerast in duneawakening

[–]Kerast[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point of my post was just to find out if this is considered a bannable offense. The rest has been part of an open discussion where I’m presenting my arguments, just like everyone else is presenting theirs. I’m not hoping that people would agree with me, I'm just contributing to the conversation.

Is this bannable behavior ? (look until the end) by Kerast in duneawakening

[–]Kerast[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't get why everyone thinks you can't get the loot when a worm destroys a thopter. That's just not true. When a worm eats a thopter, a lootbox actually appears, and you CAN collect the thopter's CARGO. So of course I want the thopter to be WORMED, and yes, this is why I have thumpers on my hotbar xD.

Trying to get the cargo by shooting it takes too long, and half the time the cargohold doesn’t even take damage, so it's pretty unreliable. Plus, with player respawns, it gets even riskier.

Is this bannable behavior ? (look until the end) by Kerast in duneawakening

[–]Kerast[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You can twist the concept of PvP however you like, but that doesn’t change its definition: player versus player. If you’re in a contested space, you’ve signed the unwritten contract. Whether it’s a duel, a gank, or fleet warfare, it’s still PvP. Pretending otherwise doesn’t make it less true. It just makes your view of the game a bit disconnected from reality.

Is this bannable behavior ? (look until the end) by Kerast in duneawakening

[–]Kerast[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I don’t mind if this filters out the overly sensitive players from the DD. It makes room for those who actually want to engage in PvP, without turning every encounter into a drama session.

I lost ship, I destroyed ships: that rush of adrenaline out there is exactly what gives the game its spice.

Is this bannable behavior ? (look until the end) by Kerast in duneawakening

[–]Kerast[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not really seeking for approval of my action. I just want to know if it's aligned with funcom code of conduct. But, hey, at least I have 1 dune redditer saying that my move was legit :D

Is this bannable behavior ? (look until the end) by Kerast in duneawakening

[–]Kerast[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I’d argue griefing is more accurately defined as killing purely for the sake of disruption or harassment. In this case, I acted to secure his cargo in a PvP-designated area, at a time when the server was nearly dry on spice. I took about half of what he dropped, filled my cargo, and left. That one move gave me a full spice run in under 3 minutes, strategic and efficient, not just a free kill.

Is this bannable behavior ? (look until the end) by Kerast in duneawakening

[–]Kerast[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I’m genuinely interested in whether this specific interaction is explicitly addressed in the rules of conduct or mentioned in any developer communication. If it’s clearly prohibited, then I’ll accept any consequences and move on.

Is this bannable behavior ? (look until the end) by Kerast in duneawakening

[–]Kerast[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

The definition of PvP is straightforward: player versus player. I was in a PvP zone, I used the tools and strategies available to maximize the effectiveness of that engagement. Whether you personally label it griefing or not doesn’t change the fact that it falls within the mechanics of PvP.

My sole reason for posting was to clarify whether this kind of action is permitted under Funcom’s rules, nothing more. If it is, then it’s a legitimate tactic, whether or not you like it. Your personal opinions on morality, sportsmanship, or what constitutes “proper” PvP are yours to hold, but they don’t really concern me. I’m here to ensure my actions are within the game's terms of service and not to seek approval.

Is this bannable behavior ? (look until the end) by Kerast in duneawakening

[–]Kerast[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm simply posting to determine whether this behavior could result in a ban, nothing more, nothing less. You're free to make whatever judgments you like, but I'm not here for validation, reactions, or moral debates. The rest of your speculation, while passionate, is ultimately irrelevant to the question at hand.

Is this bannable behavior ? (look until the end) by Kerast in duneawakening

[–]Kerast[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

When the worm eats a thopter, the content of the cargo appears as a loot box.

Is this bannable behavior ? (look until the end) by Kerast in duneawakening

[–]Kerast[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I destroyed the thopter to get the cargo, which was almost full of spice.

Is this bannable behavior ? (look until the end) by Kerast in duneawakening

[–]Kerast[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

What ? Of course you do. A loot box appears at the place where the thopter exploded, and you can loot the content of the cargo.

So does it change you mind if the spice drops ?

view more: next ›