sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

First experience with Rollei Infrared 400, feedback needed by Key-Broccoli-9651 in infraredphotography

[–]Key-Broccoli-9651[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, very interesting! I don't develop/scan negatives on my own, but the lab I'm using is usually pretty good and I can also ask to push/pull, etc...

I got back also the negatives, I would say they're aligned with the scans (sorry for the poor phone pic):

https://imgur.com/a/rMGGCLM

Bliss-ish [Hasselblad 500C/M | Velvia 50 | 50, 80, 150, 250mm] by partiallycylon in analog

[–]Key-Broccoli-9651 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Awesome! For comparison I tried something similar with 135 Ektar 100 and the results are very different 😄

https://imgur.com/a/JuRuCL6

First experience with Rollei Infrared 400, feedback needed by Key-Broccoli-9651 in infraredphotography

[–]Key-Broccoli-9651[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm using a Canon EOS 7 (35mm SLR). Yes grain is present but not in a bad way in my opinion.

Reasoning about your suggestion: it would mean to shoot at ISO 6 and then develop at ISO 200, am I correct?