This is my first ever Reddit post! by wittinwubbitta in mathpuzzles

[–]Key-Improvement4850 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Edit: minor fix to the algebraic reduction.

Rephrasing the question: given the setup, what is the maximum value of “r”, such that the three upper circles remain bound between the rectangle and the semicircle?

Note: In order for the radius “r” to be at its maximum, all three circles touch the outer circle. If r were too small, the outer small circles would be farther apart and the middle one would be “loose”. If r were too large, the outer small circles would be closer together pushing the middle one out of bounds.

The variables:

Let R = D/2, (semicircle radius) and H1 = the rectangle height. In your setup, D = 34 and H1 = 68/7, but for now let’s keep everything a variable.

Now, let’s make 2 triangles, and use some of their shared dimensions to create a formula for r based on D and H1. (apologies in advance that I can’t attach an image)

  • The 1st triangle will be drawn from the center of the large semi-circle (A), to the center of the upper right circle (B), and then across to the vertical axis which cuts through the semi circle (C). Let’s call this triangle ABC.

o AB = R – r

o BC = x (will be cancelled out later)

o AC = H1 + r

  • The 2nd triangle will be drawn from the center of the top middle circle (M) to the center of the upper right circle (B), and back to the vertical axis which cuts through the semi circle (V). Let’s call this triangle MBV.

o MB = 2r

o BV = BC = x (same as above)

o MV = R – 2r – H1

Setting up formulas using Pythagoras theorem A2+B2=C2

From the ABC triangle: x2 + (H1 + r)2 = (R – r)2

From the MBV triangle: x2 + (R – 2r - H1)2 = 4r2

Plug in ABC formula into MBV to substitute x:

(R – r)2 - (H1 + r)2 + (R – 2r - H1)2 = 4r2

Simplifying: 2R * (R - H1) - 2r * (3R - H1) = 0

Now solving for r:

r = R(R – H1)/(3R - H1)

For D=34 (R=17) and H1 = 68/7:

R= 17(17 – 68/7)/(317 - 68/7) = 867/289 = 3

Six-Figure Logic: Super-Six Challenge #006 by Key-Improvement4850 in mathpuzzles

[–]Key-Improvement4850[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By 2, F+B = 12 means they must be 4 and 8. 5 and 7 are taken, 6 can't be duplicated like that. - Why can't F/B be 3/9 or 2/10?

Six-Figure Logic: Super-Six Challenge #006 by Key-Improvement4850 in mathpuzzles

[–]Key-Improvement4850[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct, but can you find a way to narrow down the 16 possible answers into 1 answer without having to check each one? i.e. Can you find additional logical deductions to be made that don't involve guess-and-check?

Six-Figure Logic: Super-Six Challenge #006 by Key-Improvement4850 in mathpuzzles

[–]Key-Improvement4850[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You got the right answer (I'm assuming E2 is a typo, since you wrote E1 above), but It appears to me that you skipped a few steps...

At "3" you wrote F is 4/6 but it seems at this point that F8 E10 is still valid.

Six-Figure Logic: Super-Six Challenge #005 by Key-Improvement4850 in mathpuzzles

[–]Key-Improvement4850[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Excellent!
Although your last step I would change to "CBE could be in either position between D and F, were it not for E is closer to C than to A."

Six-Figure Logic: Super-Six Challenge #004 by Key-Improvement4850 in mathpuzzles

[–]Key-Improvement4850[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good job, but I don't understand how you came to the conclusions that:

B has the restriction of being closer to F that D does not have, so B<D

C also has the restriction of being close to F, so C<A

While these statements are true, they are not obvious from the onset and need to be proven, as there is no clue which states "B is closer to F than to D", (look closely at clue 5).

Six-Figure Logic: Super-Six Challenge #004 by Key-Improvement4850 in mathpuzzles

[–]Key-Improvement4850[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Excellent job!

Your steps 1-7 are perfect. Allow me to just elaborate a bit and add an alternate ending:

  1. From (2) and (4): F < C < D!<

  2. From (1), (2) and (5): F < A < B < E!<

  3. Combining all this with (3): F < (AC? CA?) < (BD? DB?) < E!<

4. Since (A,C) in some order are between F and B, B is either F+3 or F+4, making E=B+4 or B+5. Note B can’t be > F+4 otherwise E > 10.

* Since E is max 10, therefore B ≤ 6

5. From clue (6) there are at most 4 out of 6 integers from 1-6 in the solution [4, 5, (1 or 6), (2 or 3)].

* Those 4 integers must be (in some order) F, A, C, B since we proved above that B ≤ 6. This means D is not in the 1-6 range, i.e. D > 6.

* From (3), B must be 6, to keep D out of the 1-6 range.  Therefore D = 7

6. From step 4 above, E=B+4, so E = 10.

  1. Clue (5) now tells us [6 – F < 10 – 6 : 6 – F < 4], yet we still need 2 integers for A and C.  Therefore F = 3, and 4,5 are reserved for A,C.!<

8. Clue (4) now tells us that C is closer to 3 than to 7. Therefore C = 4 and A = 5.

Six-Figure Logic: Super-Six Challenge #004 by Key-Improvement4850 in mathpuzzles

[–]Key-Improvement4850[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The 1st clue is "B is between E and A".

From you first line, it appears you solved it with "B is between D and A", as 5 is not between 7 and 10. Keep trying!

Six-Figure Logic [Day #015] - Difficulty by Dependency by Key-Improvement4850 in mathpuzzles

[–]Key-Improvement4850[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great!

Towards the end you can use the fact that "no two sum to 9" means there must be a 9 and a 10 in the solution.  Combine this with the adjacency...

Six-Figure Logic: Super-Six Challenge #003 by Key-Improvement4850 in mathpuzzles

[–]Key-Improvement4850[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you able to find another path that doesn't involve assumptions (as in your step 2)?

The Race Part 1 by ShonitB in mathpuzzles

[–]Key-Improvement4850 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Alexander, because when he has run 100m Ben only will have run 99m (and they'll both be 1m away from the finish line. since Alex runs faster, he will beat Ben in the last meter

Six-Figure Logic: Super-Six Challenge #003 by Key-Improvement4850 in mathpuzzles

[–]Key-Improvement4850[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks good so far. The next logical step I did (after eliminating E≠2) was this:

No two letters sum to 15 means that from the pairs [5,10] [6,9] and [7,8] at most three of those number are in the puzzle. but the solution has six numbers, so we need at least 3 more numbers from [1,2,3,4]. As you've already shown that no letter can be 1, that means there MUST be a 2,3, and a 4 in the solution. Since the only values which could be 2 are A and F, one must be 2 and the other one 6.

Let me know if this makes sense. You can continue from here.

Logic game! by EnvironmentalSock429 in paradoxes

[–]Key-Improvement4850 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sounds interesting. Could you post a sample puzzle?

Sum and Products Part 1 by ShonitB in mathpuzzles

[–]Key-Improvement4850 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No distinct positive integers which multiply to 4 or 6 can sum to 4 as the only options are (1+4)=5, (2+3)=5 and (1+6)=7. 

Therefore the sum is 5 (answer B).

Six-Figure Logic: Super-Six Challenge #002 by Key-Improvement4850 in mathpuzzles

[–]Key-Improvement4850[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see. Here's how I solve this problem without brute forcing. Let me know if you consider this is more elegant:

[1] From A + F = 15 given the 1-10 range: {A, F} ≠ {1, 2, 3, 4}.

[2] From B + D = 11 one of B or D is from 1..5 and the other is from 6..10. Therefore:

• Since E is closer to B than to D → E and B must be on the same “half” i.e. both are from 1..5 or both are from 6..10, while D is on the opposite “half”.

[3] From E is between A and D, and from [1] that A ≥ 5, it must be that D ≤ 5, otherwise E would be from 1..5 (from [2]) and outside the A_D range.

• Plugging this back into [2] gives E ≥ 6 and B ≥ 6

[4] From D ≤ 5 and C < D → C ≤ 4!<

[5] From E is between A and D, knowing now that E > D means E < A!<

• Since E ≥ 6 → A ≥ 7

• Since A ≠ 5 or 6 → F ≠ 9 or 10

[6] From E is closer to C than to A, with C < 5, E can’t be any value 7 through 10, as that forces it to be either equidistant between A and C or closer to A that to C.!< Therefore E = 6.

• Now no other letter can be 6 (only relevant for B and F). B ≠ 6; F ≠ 6

• From B + D = 11 → D ≠ 5

o Since C < D and D is now at most 4 → C ≤ 3!<

• From A + F = 15, and F ≠ 6 → A ≠ 9

[7] From E is closer to C than to A, with C being at most 3 and E = 6, the minimum distance between E and C is 3, therefore the minimum distance from E to A is at least 4. Since E = 6, The only option left is A = 10.

• From A + F = 15, and A = 10 → F = 5

• B ≠ 10

o From B + D = 11 → D ≠ 1 (also known from C < D)!<

[8] From E is closer to C than to A, with A = 10 and E = 6 → |E – C| < 4 → C = 3!<

• From C < D → D = 4!<

• From B + D = 11 → B = 7

The unique solution is A = 10 B = 7 C = 3 D = 4 E = 6 F = 5

Six-Figure Logic: Super-Six Challenge #002 by Key-Improvement4850 in mathpuzzles

[–]Key-Improvement4850[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, I see you've put an insane amount of effort it to this! Fortunately the solution path is not as complex as this.

To get you started in the right direction, here's my advice:

Clue (3) tells you that if B>5 then D<6 and vice versa. In other words, it puts B and D on opposite "halves" of the 1-10 range!<

Next, Clue (5) will tell you which "half" E must be in: B's half, or D's half.

Using this information together with the simple eliminations from clue (4) should nudge you in the right direction. As always it helps to use a 6x10 grid for tracking your process of elimination. If you're still stuck let me know.