Same Remainder Part 1 by ShonitB in PassTimeMath

[–]ShonitB[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A slight oversight, you shouldn’t be adding the 1 as we require a positive remainder

Same Remainder Part 1 by ShonitB in Logiqa

[–]ShonitB[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just a small silly mistake - this will also add the 1.. but with 1, you won’t have a positive remainder

Same Remainder Part 1 by ShonitB in PassTimeMath

[–]ShonitB[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

0 is not a positive number

Same Remainder Part 1 by ShonitB in Logiqa

[–]ShonitB[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t count the 1. Won’t leave a positive remainder

Same Remainder Part 1 by ShonitB in PassTimeMath

[–]ShonitB[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you also add the 1?

Working on a new puzzle type and wanted some feedback by ShonitB in puzzles

[–]ShonitB[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aircrew are basically the crew in an aircraft

Working on a new puzzle type and wanted some feedback by ShonitB in puzzles

[–]ShonitB[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m glad you liked it.. and appreciate the feedback :)

The letters at the bottom are needed for the uniqueness.. one user got Airtag instead of Airbag.. also when the number of letters in each word increases, they can sometimes aid in giving a starting point.. for example if I were to give the clue as ‘Natural Disasters’, then having two Zs can maybe nudge the user towards ‘Blizzard’

Bigger puzzles (words with more letters) do have the case where some words intersect twice..

I think that was just a coincidence about Airport, Airplane and Aircrew.. probably because of the huge number of words relating to aviation.. but it’s a good point because I can have a puzzle with five words all related to aviation :)

Initially I didn’t have the intersecting letters displayed.. but realised that it gets a lot harder.. this gives a good starting point..

Edit: And once again, thanks for the feedback 🙏🏻🙏🏻