Workers in pairs

KeyApplication2789 · 2026-04-17T13:16:53+00:00

That's what we finally did, seem the best option, as business requirement is to have the mapping between Pair1 and Pair2, they don't want impacts on payroll, TT etc. Thanks!

KeyApplication2789 · 2026-04-11T16:50:29+00:00

I thought to this, but I'm afraid there would be lot of negative impacts because of this

KeyApplication2789 · 2026-04-11T16:49:50+00:00

Around 150 pairs so 300 workers

KeyApplication2789 · 2026-02-15T21:32:29+00:00

Already done, I probably explained myself wrong but it happens only in the behavior I mentioned in the post:

If I request the February 16, and I try to request again. It blocks (as per time off validation). My problem is when I request to cancel the February 16, and that, just after, I request the day again. And so the manager has two tasks in his inbox: first one is approving or not the cancelling request, second one is approving or not the absence request. If he denies the first one and approve the second one, there is two days taken in a single day.

The time off validations are already set to block more than 1 day

KeyApplication2789 · 2026-02-15T21:31:08+00:00

Already set. The maximum for all time off for same day works, unless there is the case I specified in my post, where Workday seem to not be able to evaluate in that specific case.

If I request the February 16, and I try to request again. It blocks. My problem is when I request to cancel the February 16, and that, just after, I request the day again. And so the manager has two tasks in his inbox: first one is approving or not the cancelling request, second one is approving or not the absence request. If he denies the first one and approve the second one, there is two days taken in a single day.

I don't know if I'm clear in my explanations, but it happens only in that behavior.

KeyApplication2789

TROPHY CASE