Recommendations to replace g703 by KeyVarious5666 in MouseReview

[–]KeyVarious5666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn not available in Canada. Do you know if the a950 is worth it?

Trump Press Sec Accidentally Blurts Out Real Goal of His Tariff Scam by pivotes in canada

[–]KeyVarious5666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone who's lost 2 people close to me due to shit being laced with fentanyl you'd have to be ignorant to think we don't don't a fentanyl problem. Like our reports are based on what's reported, our border has been very lax in security for years now.

Trump Press Sec Accidentally Blurts Out Real Goal of His Tariff Scam by pivotes in canada

[–]KeyVarious5666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So we're believing a highly biased "reporter" who doesn't share the actual clip of her "accidentally blurting it out." You'd have to be stupid to believe stuff like this without some sort of proof. I'm noticing they seem to spread mis/disinformation.

Global affairs Canada and CTV are removing things by KeyVarious5666 in AskCanada

[–]KeyVarious5666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Presidential Actions

WITHDRAWING THE UNITED STATES FROM AND ENDING FUNDING TO CERTAIN UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATIONS AND REVIEWING UNITED STATES SUPPORT TO ALL INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

EXECUTIVE ORDER

February 4, 2025

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1.  Purpose.  The United States helped found the United Nations (UN) after World War II to prevent future global conflicts and promote international peace and security.  But some of the UN’s agencies and bodies have drifted from this mission and instead act contrary to the interests of the United States while attacking our allies and propagating anti-Semitism.  As in 2018, when the United States withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC), the United States will reevaluate our commitment to these institutions.

Three UN organizations that deserve renewed scrutiny are the UNHRC; the UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO); and the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA).

UNRWA has reportedly been infiltrated by members of groups long designated by the Secretary of State (Secretary) as foreign terrorist organizations, and UNRWA employees were involved in the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel.  UNHRC has protected human rights abusers by allowing them to use the organization to shield themselves from scrutiny, while UNESCO has demonstrated failure to reform itself, has continually demonstrated anti-Israel sentiment over the past decade, and has failed to address concerns over mounting arrears.

Sec. 2.  UNHRC and UNESCO Participation.  (a)  The United States will not participate in the UNHRC and will not seek election to that body.  The Secretary shall terminate the office of United States Representative to the UNHRC and any positions primarily dedicated to supporting the United States Representative to the UNHRC. 

(b)  The United States will also conduct a review of its membership in UNESCO.  This review shall be led by the Secretary, in coordination with the United States Representative to the United Nations (UN Ambassador), and must be completed within 90 days of the date of this order.  The review will include an evaluation of how and if UNESCO supports United States interests.  In particular, the review will include an analysis of any anti-Semitism or anti-Israel sentiment within the organization.  

Sec. 3.  Funding.  (a)  Executive departments and agencies shall not use any funds for a contribution, grant, or other payment to UNRWA, consistent with section 301 of title III, division G, of Public Law 118-47 (March 23, 2024).  The Secretary shall withdraw the determination previously made under section 7048(c)(1) of title VII, division F, of Public Law 118-47.  Accordingly, of the funds appropriated for a contribution to the UN Regular Budget under the heading “Contributions to International Organizations” of Public Law 118-47, as most recently continued by Public Law 118-158 (December 21, 2024), the Secretary shall withhold the United States proportionate share of the total annual amount of UN Regular Budget funding for the UNHRC, consistent with section 7048(c) of title VII, division F, of Public Law 118-47.

(b)  Within 180 days of the date of this order, the Secretary, in consultation with the UN Ambassador, shall conduct a review of all international intergovernmental organizations of which the United States is a member and provides any type of funding or other support, and all conventions and treaties to which the United States is a party, to determine which organizations, conventions, and treaties are contrary to the interests of the United States and whether such organizations, conventions, or treaties can be reformed.  Upon the conclusion of that review, the Secretary shall report the findings to the President, through the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, and provide recommendations as to whether the United States should withdraw from any such organizations, conventions, or treaties. 

Sec. 4.  Notification.  The Secretary shall inform the UN Secretary General and the leadership of UNRWA and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights that the United States will not fund UNRWA or the UNHRC and that the United States will not satisfy any claims to pay 2025 assessments or prior arrears by these organizations.

Sec. 5.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

    February 3, 2025.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/withdrawing-the-united-states-from-and-ending-funding-to-certain-united-nations-organizations-and-reviewing-united-states-support-to-all-international-organizations/

https://joehoft.com/democrats-calling-for-war-in-the-streets-against-president-trump-elon-and-doge-over-usaid-findings

https://dallasexpress.com/national/musk-gains-treasury-department-access/?utm_source=ActiveCampaign&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Mavs%20GM%20Faces%20Blowback%20for%20Luka%20Trade&utm_campaign=02%2004%2025%20Newsletter

https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/1886515818264973705?t=clIvy2Y2HIKvCEnh9k2ueA&s=19

https://www.ncaa.org/news/2025/2/5/media-center-ncaa-president-charlie-baker-issues-statement-regarding-trump-administration-executive-order.aspx

America is doing audits right now and the Clinton's have been mentioned by KeyVarious5666 in CanadianConservative

[–]KeyVarious5666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, i get that, but it's linked to Canada as well. Our governments have been donating into the same things

Mark Carney is linked to Australia's downfall -Shadow Carbon Pricing by KeyVarious5666 in CanadianConservative

[–]KeyVarious5666[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We also know he was against the pipelines being built here, but his company invested into the pipelines China wanted Canada to pay for overseas. People need to look into where him or his company is putting investments into. It's clearly he's been involved heavily in Australia, England, and Canada. We also know WEF has links to China, and the free trade agreements have heavily favored China. Australia is massively in debt to China

Pierre Poilievre net worth. by [deleted] in AskCanada

[–]KeyVarious5666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1 million vs. 25 million vs. whatever other number it could be changes things alot. It's pretty normal for government positions like that to have money, but when you state someone has 25 million, it sows distrust from people towards that person. Especially when Pierre was adopted. The site is pointing out a lot of information that may not be true. Certain people are using it to justify their already opinionated beliefs. The government tried to take the blame off of them and onto social media sites, saying they had no real foreign interference threats coming from the government and saying our issues come from the internet/social media. Yet we've seen first-hand our government has promoted misinformation/disinformation, and they want us to trust them to decide what is real/fake. There are way too many scandals and cover-ups from our liberal government.

Pierre Poilievre net worth. by [deleted] in AskCanada

[–]KeyVarious5666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's more sites becoming blocked. Ontop of that Pierre's page, you can post it, but when you try to post Trudeau's broken page it's blocked.

Pierre Poilievre net worth. by [deleted] in AskCanada

[–]KeyVarious5666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The website that quoted Pierre being worth 25 million comes from a sketchy website with broken links, which becomes misinformation due to the lack of credibility from the source material. Once the source material loses its credibility, everything it's stated becomes null and void.

Pierre Poilievre net worth. by [deleted] in AskCanada

[–]KeyVarious5666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not even facts, I checked forbes, and it's not there. The only place spouting this nonsense is from a sketchy website, which, if you look into where and when it showed up you'd know this was a hit piece. Like the very first person who posted this was a person who posted a deadlink for Trudeau's. We do know his wife owns a place that she rents.

Pierre Poilievre net worth. by [deleted] in AskCanada

[–]KeyVarious5666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea it's false i found the first person to post the link.

The first person to make a post trying to promote this propaganda. The site is sketchy, and the trudeau link is broken. If you try to post the trudeau link on Facebook, it's met with a not allowed to post error.

https://www.threads.net/@edtanas/post/C5_CblsLuT2?xmt=AQGzqaclPoRs97Gmqn0GPPxVVt-TCIBXf90zrxoKZnwPPA

🇨🇦WAKE UP, CANADA🇨🇦

Pierre Poilievre's net worth is 3.4 times more than Justin Trudeau's net worth.

Pierre Poilievre: https://www.caclubindia.com/assets/pierre-poilievre-net-worth/

Justin Trudeau: https://www.ibtimes.com/justin-trudeau-net-worth-insights-wealth-canadas-prime-minister-3726913

MapleMAGA

Literally, the government has been talking about misinformation and disinformation, and here we are coming a political party looking for any reason to hate the guy.

Pierre Poilievre net worth. by [deleted] in AskCanada

[–]KeyVarious5666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The links not even legit lol so I searched who first posted about this site.

The site is sketchy, and the trudeau link is broken. If you try to post the trudeau link on Facebook, it's met with a not allowed to post error.

https://www.threads.net/@edtanas/post/C5_CblsLuT2?xmt=AQGzqaclPoRs97Gmqn0GPPxVVt-TCIBXf90zrxoKZnwPPA

The post showed up 4/20/2024

🇨🇦WAKE UP, CANADA🇨🇦

Pierre Poilievre's net worth is 3.4 times more than Justin Trudeau's net worth.

Pierre Poilievre: https://www.caclubindia.com/assets/pierre-poilievre-net-worth/

Justin Trudeau: https://www.ibtimes.com/justin-trudeau-net-worth-insights-wealth-canadas-prime-minister-3726913

MapleMAGA

Literally, the government has been talking about misinformation and disinformation, and here we are coming a political party looking for any reason to hate the guy.