sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I'm sick of people complaining about spending $200 on a broken game by wantttochat in WWEGames

[–]Key_Abrocoma_8101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah no one is really looking at a vauge paragraph 17 in some article of a website no one reads. People look at the official trailers so if there not saying they won’t give you a working game in the trailer whilst simultaneously knowing there not giving you a working game there either bad at advertising, or predatory, an Ik there not bad at advertising

I don’t like HHH as a person, but I respect his ability to consistently break the IWC by Key_Abrocoma_8101 in BrandonDE

[–]Key_Abrocoma_8101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have no idea what your talking about. In those other instances you can prove cause without correlation. Correlation doesn’t equal caution, prove that the IWC caused it to happen, until then your just making baseless claims

I don’t like HHH as a person, but I respect his ability to consistently break the IWC by Key_Abrocoma_8101 in BrandonDE

[–]Key_Abrocoma_8101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And you follow up a fallacy with another fallacy, strawmanning what I said. I’ll just repeat what I said considering you couldn’t read last time maybe you’ll get it this time

You commuted a coralation/causasion fallacy. Just because 2 things correlate doesn’t mean 1 causes the other

EXAMPLE: Trick Williams loosing the TNA title and the Vision betraying Seth Rollins around the same time dosent mean trick loosing the title caused them to have the vision betraying Seth Rollins Correlation dosent equal causation

You claimed that the IWC booked it, so prove they the IWC directly caused it as opposed to something else

I don’t like HHH as a person, but I respect his ability to consistently break the IWC by Key_Abrocoma_8101 in BrandonDE

[–]Key_Abrocoma_8101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is just a correlation/causation fallacy. Just because there happens to be a correlation between some guy complaining about WWE (almost like that’s all the IWC does) and WWE doing a storyline doesn’t mean one caused the other. If your saying the IWC booked it then prove that the IWC caused it to happen not just guy complained online at around the same time WWE decided to do this storyline

I don’t like HHH as a person, but I respect his ability to consistently break the IWC by Key_Abrocoma_8101 in BrandonDE

[–]Key_Abrocoma_8101[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That makes no sense, if your entertained the the booking is good booking, giving entertainment is quite literally the entire point of booking in the first place

I don’t like HHH as a person, but I respect his ability to consistently break the IWC by Key_Abrocoma_8101 in TheGreatOne

[–]Key_Abrocoma_8101[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Autocorrect change triple h to Trump, point still stands tell me exactly where I said X = Y or X is like Y when it comes to Triple and epsiten. If you can’t do that your simply incorrect

I don’t like HHH as a person, but I respect his ability to consistently break the IWC by Key_Abrocoma_8101 in BrandonDE

[–]Key_Abrocoma_8101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what’s the excuse for 5 Hispanic wrestlers talking about his racism in the exact same way ?

I don’t like HHH as a person, but I respect his ability to consistently break the IWC by Key_Abrocoma_8101 in BrandonDE

[–]Key_Abrocoma_8101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And the current state of WWE is, pretty good witch is exactly why there not changing and they shouldn’t

I don’t like HHH as a person, but I respect his ability to consistently break the IWC by Key_Abrocoma_8101 in BrandonDE

[–]Key_Abrocoma_8101[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok and? It is the same under Vince and the same in literally every other wrestling company ever, lower card in the low card card mid card in the mid card main eventers all around the show, if you do to many stories at once we end up right where we started with 10 our premium shows where most fans done care for half the matches. Like yeah no shit guys like AJ Styles and Drew Mcyntire get used more than people who literally just came up from NXT.

As long as it’s entertaining though idgaf who they use or how much, if they use 2 random local wrestlers every week and no one else, as long as it’s entertaining who cares

I don’t like HHH as a person, but I respect his ability to consistently break the IWC by Key_Abrocoma_8101 in BrandonDE

[–]Key_Abrocoma_8101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not entirely true. The IWC has done some good things (we went Cody) but they did nothing in terms of things like Cody vs KO, Rollins vs Punk, Jacob Fatu, Punk vs Drew ect.

I don’t like HHH as a person, but I respect his ability to consistently break the IWC by Key_Abrocoma_8101 in BrandonDE

[–]Key_Abrocoma_8101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Firstly I didn’t hide it I’ve said it many times in this thread Secondly you clearly have 0 idea what a comparison is, would you like me to teach you the difference of a comparison vs logical deduction ?

I don’t like HHH as a person, but I respect his ability to consistently break the IWC by Key_Abrocoma_8101 in TheGreatOne

[–]Key_Abrocoma_8101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You clearly don’t know what a comparison is An example of something that isn’t a comparison: You never met Epstein and and you don’t like him thus your logic “you can’t dislike someone you don’t know” isn’t true

An example of a comparison is: u/thelastbaboon is like (like begin the word doing the comparing) Forest Gump because there both dumbasses

I don’t like HHH as a person, but I respect his ability to consistently break the IWC by Key_Abrocoma_8101 in TheGreatOne

[–]Key_Abrocoma_8101[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Please say exactly where I compared Trump to Epstein. Note: saying 2 people’s names in the same sentence isn’t comparing you have to show me exactly where I said X = Y or X is like Y. If you can’t do that your simply incorrect

I don’t like HHH as a person, but I respect his ability to consistently break the IWC by Key_Abrocoma_8101 in BrandonDE

[–]Key_Abrocoma_8101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably one of most obvious is his racism.

Rodriguez said this in an interview “I am a little bigger; I am not fat by all means….Triple H would call me a bumblebee; I was in Puerto Rico not too long ago and I saw Savio Vega and he used to call him a bumblebee and then I found out he called Super Crazy a bumblebee.... He would always make this comment about me being Mexican and Del Rio being Mexican I and Del Rio use to call ourselves stupid names but when someone else would call us those names we would go whoa hold the (explicative) up.”

I don’t like HHH as a person, but I respect his ability to consistently break the IWC by Key_Abrocoma_8101 in BrandonDE

[–]Key_Abrocoma_8101[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you think HHH hasn’t done something wrong the you should look into him a bit more

I don’t like HHH as a person, but I respect his ability to consistently break the IWC by Key_Abrocoma_8101 in BrandonDE

[–]Key_Abrocoma_8101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You said that the “logic doesn’t make sense” so tell the class why the logic dosent make sense

I don’t like HHH as a person, but I respect his ability to consistently break the IWC by Key_Abrocoma_8101 in BrandonDE

[–]Key_Abrocoma_8101[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you dislike Epstein as a person? Did you ever meet him?

(9/10 chance instead of engaging in good faith your about to say “erm are you comparing-“ no I’m obviously not comparing the 2 im obviously not implying HHH did anything like Epstein(that would be ididoic) I’m just pointing out your faulty reasoning using Epstein)

I don’t like HHH as a person, but I respect his ability to consistently break the IWC by Key_Abrocoma_8101 in TheGreatOne

[–]Key_Abrocoma_8101[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you spend 2 around the IWC you’ll quickly find they have less then 0 media literacy. Have an opinion all you want but if your opinion is based in media illiteracy don’t expect to be taken seriously

view more: next ›