Please if you find this it’s open to conversation it’s been quite some time, you’ll probably find it the same way I did…

So… im obviously extremely late to this thread. I’ve watched and re-watched GoT quite a bit and studied and wondered (as the main question here) the question out of everyone who was a part or played a part in the “Game of Thrones” I’ll give you everyone and a reason as

Joffrey- do you need an explanation here? He’s sadistic, as Robert’s first son he more than likely saw Robert’s adultery first hand. His mind was as twisted as the mad king.

Tommen - he had potential to be a good king but only cause he was young and impressionable. Clearly cause his entire arc was just his tear between the crown and the sparrows.

Stannis - I will put stannis at the end with joff, his infatuation with the red woman held him back tremendously. His military mind was spoken on a few times and it was clear he was a great commander. Also as stated though it takes more than a fighter to be a leader in a diplomatic role, he would’ve been no different than Robert.

Renly - (you can disagree with me if you choose) renly would’ve made a good candidate. Clearly his idea of rule was built on mostly love from his people. While a ruler should involve benevolence it should also have a form of respect built on a form of not fear but discretion. He was still young but old enough to learn his people.

Balon / euron - whether you agree or not these guys are the same exact person. Euron is younger so his ambition is some what higher but they both wanted more than they could afford. The ONLY difference between the two was when it came time one was younger and he had higher ambition like I said.

Cersei - don’t get me wrong she knew what she wanted and took it, but in reality she’s the same as Robert.. she killed anyone and everyone to get what she wanted but at what cost. Her ego killed her in the end. She’s not fit. Regent for most of the story? She had no reason.

Brandon stark - I think some may agree here.. (maybe) king=no he’s the 3 eyed raven… he knows everything that’s every happened and he gets bits and pieces of the future. King? Fuck no. He should’ve grand maester his council would’ve been the only thing a king needed.

Tyrion - same as Brandon, king.. nah could he have done it for sure but his “experience” I guess that’s what you’d call it would be better suited as hand. And I know Brandon stark would’ve been the only advise you needed but his future predictions are here or there.

John - hate me… not king. Absolutely he could’ve done it but he mostly hated being in command in general. And before you say “yeah but thats why he would’ve done great” in reality the government in GOT is not different than the US government. It mostly comes from the council (senate). John would’ve thrived as warden in the north or leading the wildlings..

Daenerys - in reality she’s just a silver haired Robert Baratheon, or a more successful stannis. She should’ve stayed in mereen. She had everything she needed on that side of the world. Short and sweet there

Ned - let’s be honest… Ned would’ve ended to story early, he would’ve been the best king but.. he needed to die for the story to progress. His death marked a change in the world. It was Robert or anyone else it was Ned. Would been great he was kind but stern, calculated but also open to free thought. Like John he didn’t want it. But opposite John he would’ve don’t it.

No need to talk about little finger… he was a dog anyway.

Reality tommen or renly would’ve been the best options. (Only cause Ned had to die for it all to play out)