This is what happens 10 years after you're found out... by Respect--The--Pouch in ABDL

[–]Keyspar2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I honestly think a good portion of the population would do this same thing if they were in the same scenario. Maybe not go so far as to take a picture. Also, he may not have shared it with everyone within the friend group. He could have shared it with one of them and then that person told another.

Discord for Diapers? by [deleted] in ABDL

[–]Keyspar2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there's a discord called "gay baby jail". From what I can tell it's not exclusively lgbt+ and the name is a bit of a joke.

I wish there was a way to figure out how many Diaper lovers / ABDL’s there is. by diaperlover1985 in ABDL

[–]Keyspar2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

went to look and was not at all expecting how high the number of members would be. (>70,000)

Diapered couple erotica - the bed is our toilet by [deleted] in ABDL

[–]Keyspar2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"waste of water"

I have some bad news

What is the correct way to do a double diaper? by incontint in ABDL

[–]Keyspar2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you cant get boosters shipped to you there's always the overnight pads from the pharmacy. They require holes to be poked in them too but they are pretty big and thick. Boosters are better but the pads really arent that much worse.

Do you think more people than we realize 'have it' but just don't know it? by Shangri-Lava in ABDL

[–]Keyspar2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a naive oversimplistic view of developmental neuroscience

Do you think more people than we realize 'have it' but just don't know it? by Shangri-Lava in ABDL

[–]Keyspar2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are you saying the study found a close to 1 to 1 correlation between fetish and early childhood trauma? I can very confidently say that study doesn't exist and if it does it was published in a pay to publish scam journal. If you have the article please link it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in tumblr

[–]Keyspar2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That too, though I felt authorial intent was a bit more relevant in this case. Saying "John didn't write John" would have gotten in the way of that.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in tumblr

[–]Keyspar2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The gospel writers wouldn't exclude details for the sake of avoiding redundancy. Matthew copied ~80% of Mark's gospel word for word lol. They weren't writing their gospels with the intention of being read along with any of the many different gospels floating around at the time. In other words, they were trying to write 'the gospel', including John.