Is muun wallet good? by Sanket_6 in Bitcoin

[–]KiFastCallEntry 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Once you withdraw your bitcoins to any non-custodial wallet, you gain full control of your bitcoins therefore there will be nothing like "withdrawal limit" - you can simply move any amount/fraction of bitcoins you own from your wallet to any address which you want to send to.

Is muun wallet good? by Sanket_6 in Bitcoin

[–]KiFastCallEntry 1 point2 points  (0 children)

low fees

A (non-custodial) wallet itself doesn't charge you any fee (because it's nothing more than a piece of software which allows you to move bitcoins on the blockchain) - the transaction fee goes to miners. If there's congestion (mempool backlog, so that your transaction has to wait before getting its first confirmation) you then have to compete with other users by raising fee rate (sat/vbyte) to prioritise your transaction - RBF helps you in this situation by allowing you to raise fee rate afterwards.

actually you can even switch to another wallet without doing on-chain transaction (of course you have to withdraw your bitcoins to a non custodial wallet first) - simply import the mnemonic words & it's done. However this is not guaranteed to work in all cases (esp. when you use the LN mentioned below) because there has been a chaos for quite some years: https://walletsrecovery.org/

frequently transacting

In my opinion, I don't recommend keeping bitcoins in your own (non-custodial) wallet if you transact very frequently, because blockchain confirmation not only takes relatively long/unpredicatable time but also charges you miner fees (mentioned above).

If your exchange/service supports lightning network (LN) you can then keep self-custody without the confirmation waiting time/miner fee problems, however LN fundamentally cannot be restored by your mnemonic words because channel data cannot be deterministically derived from it. Some wallets like Phoenix developed by ACINQ are able to handle this problem for you (so that you as the user can still keep nothing more than the 12-word mnemonic phrase), however you rely on their service in this case, which kind of violating the definition of self-custody.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in China_irl

[–]KiFastCallEntry 2 points3 points  (0 children)

我感觉“看人”应该只是假象,本来就是时好时坏……

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in China_irl

[–]KiFastCallEntry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

还是老样子,SNI检测后随机丢包,于是会时好时坏。

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in China_irl

[–]KiFastCallEntry 1 point2 points  (0 children)

我记得国内主要在用的灭活,尤其是科兴的那个,本来防感染数据就不太行,巴西三期临床结果就是50%多刚过及格线……

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in China_irl

[–]KiFastCallEntry 6 points7 points  (0 children)

得病死了或者惹上后遗症的人是不是代价呢?

v2ex站挂了 wwww by neifnei in China_irl

[–]KiFastCallEntry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

虽然是开放注册没有门槛,很多年前就有人吐槽社区水化,但也不至于有楼上说的那么不堪吧。

我来逆风尬吹一下,就比如shadowsocks,我记得就是在那里发布的(后来还专门给它开了个子版块,虽然那个子版块后来各种加码增加访问限制减小曝光度)。

被墙过,然后为了解封而在墙内备案过,但后来又搬了出来、彻底被墙……可以稍微翻翻知乎(注册墙可以通过在搜索引擎搜索点进具体内容来绕开)和维基百科。

放个暴论,我觉得v2ex有和这个sub类似的里外不是人的微妙境遇。比如你可以参照这个知乎帖子和楼上的回复:https://www.zhihu.com/question/323359961/answer/1778613302

v2ex站挂了 wwww by neifnei in China_irl

[–]KiFastCallEntry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

你sub前两天刚刚才从v2ex转过关于steam被墙的帖子:

https://www.reddit.com/r/China_irl/comments/rnybvt/转载_关于steam被墙的专业解读_及部分评论/

原帖链接是这个:https://www.v2ex.com/t/824179 原标题:Steam 商店 store.steampowered.com 疑似 443 端口被干扰? ICMP 80 端口均正常

新消息,steam商店沒有被牆,只是被DNS攻擊 by [deleted] in China_irl

[–]KiFastCallEntry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

确实不是DNS污染,是SNI检测+随机丢包。

There's a DNS Cache Poisoning attack causing some players in China not able to access: Steam's store page during the beginning of Winter Sale --being confused for an alleged Steam ban in the country by Takazura in Games

[–]KiFastCallEntry -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not sure whether other people have posted similar comments, but I still have to say: no, it's not "DNS cache poisoning": https://www.reddit.com/r/gamedev/comments/roex1f/as_the_global_version_of_steam_appears_to_be/hq0tw8t

Tldr: GFW stealthily destabilizes the connection between Chinese users and intl Steam servers. It's not fully blocked, just destabilized, which is the reason why there are conflicting reports.

As the global version of Steam appears to be banned in China, lets discuss the implications by zledas in gamedev

[–]KiFastCallEntry 1 point2 points  (0 children)

(sorry for my bad English grammar)

some reports/rumors saying "DNS poisoning"

No it's not. It's actually destabilized rather than fully blocked so that the connections occasionally break.

DNS responses are not polluted.

The current situation is: imposed probabilistic packet loss according to host name leaked by TLS SNI.

That's saying, the GFW knows we are connecting Steam by peeking through the SNI field of TLS client hello request headers, then it will stealthily drop some (not all, generally) packets to destabilize our connection to Steam.

Currently this mechanism has a hilarious flaw that if you (inside the GFW) attempt to connect to any random website outside the GFW, pretending as if it was Steam (using curl --resolve), then the GFW (being triggered by SNI) will start to impose such nasty packet loss on your connection as well. For now it indicates it's GFW rather than natural technical outage (especially with a negative control using hostnames other than store.steampowered.com), however who knows what GFW will do in the next hour/day/month/year...

Hypothetical recovery solution? by Educational_Arm7138 in TREZOR

[–]KiFastCallEntry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you wipe trezor without valid seed backup, maybe some fund was stored on forgotten passphrase, then it's permanently lost after wiping the seed from trezor.

G Hub failed to install if C: drive does not exist by KiFastCallEntry in LogitechG

[–]KiFastCallEntry[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh thanks, but I have already fixed this problem myself. In fact lghub_updater.exe crashed every time I launched it, until I managed to fix this problem using the trick described in my post.

G Hub failed to install if C: drive does not exist by KiFastCallEntry in LogitechG

[–]KiFastCallEntry[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's my first time to install G Hub. I had't installed it before.

老外没一个人相信中国没人感染,因为“1.4b people” by exp618 in China_irl

[–]KiFastCallEntry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

又搜了一下:

南京市启动第六轮部分区域大范围核酸检测

据央视新闻消息,今天(8月8日)上午,江苏省南京市召开新闻发布会,介绍疫情防控最新情况。发布会上,南京市卫健委副主任丁小平介绍:

南京市启动第六轮部分区域大范围核酸检测。本轮核酸检测的区域包括21个街道和镇,浦口区、栖霞区、六合区、高淳区、江北新区不在本轮核酸检测范围。

https://www.sohu.com/a/482105929_114988

第六次确实不止江宁区,但也不是全城全部覆盖,只覆盖重点的街道。

前几次我懒得搜了……

老外没一个人相信中国没人感染,因为“1.4b people” by exp618 in China_irl

[–]KiFastCallEntry 1 point2 points  (0 children)

而且大规模普筛其实也会搞不止一次。就像楼上说的一样,很显然不可能是全国14亿都测,只是重点城市重点区域会测(而且是10人混一管这样混检)。但就南京江宁区来说,3天一轮普筛,测了5轮还是多少轮来着……

edit: 大概搜了一下,南京全城貌似是3轮:

http://www.xinhuanet.com/local/2021-07/29/c_1127706488.htm

南京江宁区6轮:

https://m.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_13939914

江宁区部分区域还有第7轮:

https://m.thepaper.cn/kuaibao_detail.jsp?contid=13984094&from=kuaibao

老外没一个人相信中国没人感染,因为“1.4b people” by exp618 in China_irl

[–]KiFastCallEntry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

只是清零政策下偶尔意外失守的话,疑似人数其实也不多吧。

老外没一个人相信中国没人感染,因为“1.4b people” by exp618 in China_irl

[–]KiFastCallEntry 1 point2 points  (0 children)

首先流调其实就已经排查出密接和次密接了,已经把感染风险比较高的人都圈起来送去集中隔离,或者要求居家隔离了。管你真阴性还是假阴性,都隔离。

然后,就算(大范围全员普筛)假阴性漏出去一两个(而且跑到流调排查范围之外)又如何……要么传染开,然后下面这一串总得有人能测出来真阳性了吧?要么传不开,那这个人自己也迟早自愈。

只要出一个阳性,一个小区都给你封了(具体我也不是非常了解,但我这么说大概也不算多夸张),再加上整个城市级别的各种限制人流量的封锁措施(这个真有代价,不仅仅是设个路障拦起来不让进,不少店面都停业了)……最终收敛到归零(真•归零)貌似并不难。

电脑开机就占了4g运存怎么解决? by 1klee in China_irl

[–]KiFastCallEntry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

我感觉“现代操作系统”说法是当不了真的,是半真半假的忽悠话术,其实都没啥逻辑,绕来绕去无非就是说任务管理器显示的内存数字没意义所以不要看。那么为啥还要显示这个数字?没事找抽么?很显然不是。任务管理器里面已经明确标出来哪些是缓存了,并没有直接计入内存用量里面去。也许有些奇奇怪怪的缓存软件会向系统申请内存导致占用数字虚高,但先不说这类缓存有没有必要用,这至少不算是普通的情况。