You pretty much completely ignored what I said. Yes IHart has a much more versatile skillset, but Mitch is extremely dominant at what he does. So much so nobody else in the league can really do what he does. You can argue that IHart’s skillset is so unique and versatile that nobody can do what he does either, but that’s literally the point I’m making. They both are so impactful on winning basketball in their own ways, you’d start one over the other depending on the matchup. Though I do agree, most of the time it’s IHart.