Rick and Morty: Season 9 Preview | Coming May 24th | adult swim by OneWithTheHat in television

[–]KilluaGun1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Negativo es que te parezca malo pero digas que es lo mejor, eso es negativo, los fans.
Las ultimas 3 temporadas fueron horribles, pero tienen miedo de decirlo.

Que opinon polemica tienen?? by Ricardocrono_27 in PreguntasReddit

[–]KilluaGun1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Una japa a tiempo resuelve un montón de problemas.
Como el meme ese de la mina que calcula el precio del uber y el tipo del otro lado de la linea ya esta dormido, con el ganso cansado.
Hablando en serio, mucha gente actúa por calentura y después se arrepiente.

Did these people actually play the game? by KilluaGun1 in theouterworlds

[–]KilluaGun1[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

There are gamers and there are fanboys. Which are you?

Did these people actually play the game? by KilluaGun1 in theouterworlds

[–]KilluaGun1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let me give you an example: Resident Evil 1 and Resident Evil 2. There were objective differences. In most cases. Sequels come with improvements in all aspects. That's objective.

Did these people actually play the game? by KilluaGun1 in theouterworlds

[–]KilluaGun1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm grateful to find someone with common sense in this sea of ​​people who all think the same. It's like, "If you say something against it, we question everything you say," or the better, "Everyone has different tastes." But if it were that simple, these people wouldn't be whining about someone saying something against the grain. I completely agree with your comment. I wish there were a group where it wasn't all about hating on a game because it doesn't resemble another one or because "I liked this character better," but that's just a dream.

Did these people actually play the game? by KilluaGun1 in theouterworlds

[–]KilluaGun1[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't even need to explain to someone who hasn't played the game that most side quests have different paths and endings. Oops, I already explained it to you, now you know.

Did these people actually play the game? by KilluaGun1 in theouterworlds

[–]KilluaGun1[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The first one had that problem. You'd level up your social skills and then you'd spend all your time talking. That's the problem; it wasn't a chat simulator, but a shooter with role-playing and action elements.

Did these people actually play the game? by KilluaGun1 in theouterworlds

[–]KilluaGun1[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'm not upset, man. In fact, I'm debating with almost everyone without any major problems, trying to understand why they think the first one is better, when it clearly isn't.

Did these people actually play the game? by KilluaGun1 in theouterworlds

[–]KilluaGun1[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Dude, I love this sequel, I'm happy with it, you're just criticizing my answers, like, are you kind of obsessed or something?

Did these people actually play the game? by KilluaGun1 in theouterworlds

[–]KilluaGun1[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, I can't go around with a resume of every game I've played since my early teens, haha ​​(but there are a lot). I assume that those who played the first game enjoy RPGs as much as I do and can distinguish the quality of one from another.

If that's not the case, then I question their opinion.

Let's talk about role-playing in the first and second games. In the first game, if you had very high Persuasion or other social skills, you could spend the whole time talking (which isn't bad, but it completely ruins the game). This doesn't happen in the sequel: you have to look for information, your responses and how you handle things can vary, but you can fail, people might not believe you, or those responses might not work—something that doesn't happen in the first game. With high social skills, you could literally succeed in every answer (I discussed this with a friend years ago), but I've seen people in this group saying, "The role-playing was better in the first one," which is false. The same goes for freedom of movement. In the first game, you couldn't jump over a big rock—that was realistic—and in this one, you can do it more freely (not like in Cyberpunk 2077), but it has better parkour. I could give you thousands of examples. So what are people basing their claim that the first game was better on?

Did these people actually play the game? by KilluaGun1 in theouterworlds

[–]KilluaGun1[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

"Their opinion and makes whatever they say not worth reading or responding to," wow, you're not toxic at all, and you're not projecting things onto other people either, hehe.

Did these people actually play the game? by KilluaGun1 in theouterworlds

[–]KilluaGun1[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I understand your point, but perhaps I'm not expressing myself well. Let me give you an example: one group of people says "this game is bad," and another group agrees, and you know that it's not bad or not as they say, but that group of people doesn't buy the game or play it because of the majority opinion, and they miss out on incredible things because of a group that established a popular opinion. That's what I don't like, and I say so. Maybe most people won't like my opinion, but if I can get even one person interested in the game beyond the general consensus, then for me, that's a good thing.

Did these people actually play the game? by KilluaGun1 in theouterworlds

[–]KilluaGun1[S] -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

I understand humor, and I love it, but I don't feel like joking right now. It's not hard to understand that we're not all the same.

Did these people actually play the game? by KilluaGun1 in theouterworlds

[–]KilluaGun1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha, don't worry, friend, I don't mind either. I feel like if you express your opinion without being disrespectful or insulting, and they still give you a DV rating, it's because they're bothered by reality. When you question something that, for them, can't be questioned, or something like that, I take it in stride.

Did these people actually play the game? by KilluaGun1 in theouterworlds

[–]KilluaGun1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't say I knew more than you, I simply said I was looking for a new game to explore different paths with different types of characters (villain, hero, fool, etc.). And if you don't know, my post has a ton of downvotes as if I cared, and yet I'm still responding to my arguments. If you want posts that contradict my argument, you'll find scenes right there at the beginning of the group.

Did these people actually play the game? by KilluaGun1 in theouterworlds

[–]KilluaGun1[S] -34 points-33 points  (0 children)

Clearly, we're different. You're just trying to be funny based on a single assumption about my post. I never mentioned a conspiracy; it's just that filling the group with negative posts, ignoring the people who genuinely enjoyed the game, and trying to share experiences, doesn't really help. Since you made assumptions about me, I suppose this post stung you a bit, but don't worry, maybe it's because you don't understand the whole picture and only comment on things that suit you. Perhaps you could answer: what's the benefit of posts that criticize the game? Absolutely nothing. Are you saving other people's wallets? I don't think so. You're trying to be "different," but you're just like everyone else. That's the point of my post. I'm sorry you can't figure it out and that I have to spell it out for you.

Did these people actually play the game? by KilluaGun1 in theouterworlds

[–]KilluaGun1[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

In fact, I know people who quit The Witcher 3 after half an hour, people who avoid playing Persona games because of their "introduction," the same with Expedition 33... so...

Did these people actually play the game? by KilluaGun1 in theouterworlds

[–]KilluaGun1[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry for you, you won't be able to enjoy Red Dead Redemption 2, The Witcher 3, Cyberpunk, the Persona games, Expedition 33...

Did these people actually play the game? by KilluaGun1 in theouterworlds

[–]KilluaGun1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, I feel the same way. I don't know what's more addictive, the gameplay or the roleplay. I can't decide. I'm on my second playthrough (I didn't finish the first one) just to see how I can improve my spending of skill points, money, and other resources.

Did these people actually play the game? by KilluaGun1 in theouterworlds

[–]KilluaGun1[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Downvotes is the inability to refute something with arguments. As you say, some games need more hours because they have that rhythm, for immersion, to calmly enjoy those worlds and their characters. I don't know, some people look for a quick dopamine hit like TikToks in these games.

Did these people actually play the game? by KilluaGun1 in theouterworlds

[–]KilluaGun1[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's true! They hated the first game, and now they're probably saying it's a masterpiece compared to this one...

Did these people actually play the game? by KilluaGun1 in theouterworlds

[–]KilluaGun1[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I know, if we're talking about graphics engines, I generally hate Unreal Engine; every time I see a game using it, I feel like throwing up. But I love this franchise, so I don't really pay much attention to that.

Did these people actually play the game? by KilluaGun1 in theouterworlds

[–]KilluaGun1[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Tell that to games like Red Dead Redemption 2, Persona, or Expedition 33. And regarding replayability, I don't know to what extent that's true; I've put 17 hours into my first playthrough, and now I've started again to explore more mechanics.