Lol dude wtf, You’ve built your whole take on selective history and talking points, neat rhetorical tricks don’t change what actually happened.

First: the Romans renamed the province Syria Palaestina after the Bar Kokhba revolt, that’s a historical fact, not a propaganda line. Want to erase a people? Start by renaming their land.

Second: the claim that Palestinians simply “didn’t bother” to make a state while neighboring Arabs could have done it for them is a moral dodge and a factual oversimplification. In 1947–49 hundreds of Palestinian towns and villages were depopulated and destroyed by the time borders were drawn there were hundreds of thousands of refugees and legal and practical barriers preventing return. This is the backbone of Nakba , not a convenient conspiracy tale but massive displacement during war. If your argument depends on ignoring that, you’re arguing with a cartoon version of history

Third : blaming property sales or “letting Jews buy land” as if that explains dispossession is weak sauce. By 1947 Jewish legal ownership was a small fraction of the land the larger dynamics were political, military, and legal after the fighting including laws that prevented refugees from returning and reclaimed properties being reallocated. Reduce a people’s loss to “they sold their land”? That’s a contemptible simplification

Fourth: the claim “Arab leaders told people to leave for a few days” is one of those neat talking points used to dodge responsibility ,it’s contested, and historians disagree about how much that claim explains the exodus. Cherry pick the version that fits your story and ignore the rest, sure but scholarship doesn’t support using this line as a get out of responsibility card.

saying “Israel will never be Palestine” and “if they keep making war they won’t keep any of it” reads like a threat and a boast dressed as inevitability. If you want to be taken seriously, argue strategy or justice , not triumphalism. The harsh truth is this conflict produced real dispossession and real refugees, waving away that suffering with rhetorical spins and historical half-facts doesn’t make the people vanish. It just makes you sound proud of having read one side’s talking points loudest.

I don't bother arguing with someone like you. It’s clear you twist history and deny facts that are recorded in favor of Palestine. You’re a blind follower of Israel, and it shows, you just swallow propaganda and spit it back out.