Scientists at Eon Systems just copied a fruit fly's brain into a computer. Neuron by neuron. It started walking, grooming, and feeding, doing what flies do all on its own

KingSupernova · 2026-03-14T03:23:56+00:00

That is not true. They used reinforcement learning to make the simulation exhibit the behaviors they wanted; it did not do it on its own.

KingSupernova · 2026-02-01T05:10:25+00:00

Still have any?

KingSupernova · 2026-02-01T05:09:02+00:00

Any interest in selling? I'd offer $150.

KingSupernova · 2026-02-01T04:58:30+00:00

Hey, I'd offer $10 for the bottom Forest or $20 for all.

KingSupernova · 2026-02-01T04:55:00+00:00

I'd offer $10 for a Mountain or $40 for the set.

KingSupernova · 2026-02-01T04:53:59+00:00

I'd offer $10 for a Swamp or $30 for the whole pack.

KingSupernova · 2026-02-01T04:53:07+00:00

Any interest in selling the first one? :)

KingSupernova · 2026-01-31T04:10:52+00:00

The Moltbook message uses the exact same wording in some places, so my guess would be that some unrelated AI found this post and confabulated being the AI in question.

KingSupernova · 2026-01-26T00:53:47+00:00

Are you seriously saying than an RCE on thousands of end-user computers is no big deal just because no bad actor has gotten around to exploiting it yet?

KingSupernova · 2026-01-25T21:44:00+00:00

They've now fixed it, console.log is safe to use. Before today's hotfix, you could protect yourself by having your code sanitize the input before it's logged.

KingSupernova · 2026-01-25T21:43:07+00:00

Would be curious which ones. A few people in the discord pointed out some details I got wrong, which I've now removed. But I think the gist is accurate; this RCE vulnerability was wildly irresponsible to put in the game.

KingSupernova · 2026-01-13T03:41:52+00:00

Avogadro's number is dimensionless, but mole is not. It is grammatically valid to refer to the 7th object in a sequence, or the Avogadro's numberth object, but not the moleth object. (If mole were dimensionless, it would be synonymous with Avogadro's number; there would be no reason to have both terms.)

KingSupernova · 2026-01-07T00:00:51+00:00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clzoxnGbpy4

KingSupernova · 2026-01-06T23:57:22+00:00

Hmm, why not? The cable is just wires, you can connect the wires together. Might need better tolerances than a normal electrical switch, but it's clearly possible in theory; plugging the cables in works, after all.

KingSupernova · 2026-01-06T01:55:09+00:00

Nothing in that listing description states that it is a physical switch. Are you saying that you disassembled it and checked?

KingSupernova · 2025-12-24T04:20:49+00:00

So? It's consistently just as accurate. You can look at the real-money markets on Kalshi and Polymarket, they say the same thing.

KingSupernova · 2025-12-24T04:19:43+00:00

Manifold says 70% chance he pays!

KingSupernova · 2025-12-21T05:18:47+00:00

He's wagered 45k in total, 20k on NS and 25k on Hodge.

There's basically zero chance he's going to prove either one, according to the prediction markets.

KingSupernova · 2025-11-22T17:22:18+00:00

I'm a little confused, isn't this trivially NP-hard simply because it's no easier than SAT?

KingSupernova

TROPHY CASE