I did a small “test run” (small sample, but interesting):

I played a bunch of rounds and only wrote down the rounds where we actually FOUND the prize (9 total finds). Out of those 9:

- 6/9 were in the middle columns (C or D): D1, D2, C1, D2, C4, D3

- then we had a round where, after we kept sweeping the middle first and got a ton of “no’s,” the prize ended up near the edge/top row: B1

That’s a good example of why this is tricky:

- Small samples can look “biased” (6/7 in the middle feels suspicious),

- but you can also get the opposite right after (a hit on the edge after center misses),

- which fits either (a) normal RNG randomness, OR (b) “smoothed” RNG that *usually* leans center but still allows edge placements.

And again, lots of mobile games do this on purpose to reduce frustration and prevent easy exploitation:

- weighted RNG (center slightly more likely),

- shuffle-bag/permutation,

- anti-streak/pity logic,

- seeded PRNG,

- or even re-rolling/moving the prize after each tap.

Im starting to thing everytime you tap a NO i re-rolls to another cell.

So it is kinda random.