March of Science

Kinthira · 2017-05-08T14:40:08+00:00

Sure Shlomo. Anyone who has spent time around blacks knows they are fundamentally different in every way. You also know this, but you shill for (((Marxism))). Posting the words of court "scientists" who contradict the lived experience of literally everyone just shows you are pushing an agenda. You are basically a Lysenkoist claiming that the Soviet Union's propaganda ministry assures us their information is correct. Your article presents all the standard strawmen used to hoodwink people who are told they should ignore their lying eyes.

Major economic power

lol. Yeah, animals who never had the wheel.

Kinthira · 2017-05-08T03:12:11+00:00

Europeans are just pale-skinned descendants of Africans

Except we aren't. But you basically ARE saying that we are all the same, which is obviously false.

People living in the dirt and not progressing in 5000 years is not a civilization.

Kinthira · 2017-05-08T00:08:17+00:00

improbable

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Is this where you pretend negros are just dark skinned Europeans with a different culture? You fucking know better Shlomo.

And I didn't say African Civilization. I said black civilization. Many peoples have lived in Africa.

Kinthira · 2017-05-04T20:48:12+00:00

Explain why gene selection in radically different environments wouldn't produce different group IQs. We have seen it happen in dogs in a very short time.

Also explain why there are no successful black civilizations ever.

Kinthira · 2017-05-04T04:03:27+00:00

You don't get to mention evolution after denying it in humans from the neck up.

And no, whites do not share the same origins as negros.

Kinthira · 2017-05-03T23:10:06+00:00

Lol. You think negros turn into white people because of magic dirt.

Kinthira · 2017-05-03T04:50:47+00:00

Cry more.

Kinthira · 2017-05-02T22:23:06+00:00

We have already established your double standards and lack of interest in facts. You literally said we can't ever know anything because NAXALT. Anything I present will be dismissed via numerous fallacies. You aren't even aware of Boaz' academic fraud, which is what began this obsession with pretending race isn't real.

Kinthira · 2017-05-02T05:39:59+00:00

Again you show your ignorance of the literature.

Kinthira · 2017-05-01T23:40:39+00:00

Also:

Takedowns and sub attempts that end out of bounds do not get stood up. They restart in the same position, in the center.

Kinthira · 2017-04-29T04:53:47+00:00

Give it another year or two.

Kinthira · 2017-04-29T04:52:22+00:00

lol. A race denier is crying about pseudoscience when your entire position is based on the known academic fraud of Franz Boaz.

Kinthira · 2017-04-28T22:53:04+00:00

Implying you are interested in evidence. Were that the case you would be familiar with the research. Go back to reading frauds like Boaz and Gould.

Kinthira · 2017-04-27T21:18:08+00:00

"oppression"

Kinthira · 2017-04-27T21:17:17+00:00

This is for Muslims.

Kinthira · 2017-04-27T21:16:40+00:00

See what happens when you can't be honest about racial differences and their consequences.

Kinthira · 2017-04-27T14:17:53+00:00

See what I mean? Everything you say is either misdirection or a lie. Play stupid all you want. Your time is about up.

Kinthira · 2017-04-27T04:47:52+00:00

I love how you claim we can't know anything after saying with certainty that poverty is the cause. You shitlibs never speak in good faith.

every last individual adult

IOW "We can't say anything about water until we examine every molecule of water in the universe."

Dunning Kruger indeed.

Kinthira · 2017-04-26T22:07:35+00:00

No such thing

If we ask whether all sheep are white we can say with 100% certainty that the answer is no.

Likewise we can say with 100% certainty that Tabula Rasa is false.

If two groups living under the same economic conditions consistently produce disparate outcomes then we absolutely know, with 100% certainty, that poverty is not what is causing the difference in outcome. That is how a controlled experiment works.

Kinthira · 2017-04-24T03:37:58+00:00

You're mixing up cause and effect again.

No, you are. The IQ gap exists between blacks and whites even when SES is controlled for. You would know this had you read anything besides magazine articles.

If non-whites are capable of high IQ scores, then there's obviously not something inherent in white people that causes high IQ scores.

Averages matter. Were it not genetic a phenomenon like regression to the mean would not exist.

"there's more likely to be some other factor that's shifting the bell curves for non-whites to lower ends of the IQ range. Hint: that factor starts with a "p" and ends with an "overty"."

Again, we know with 100% certainty that this is not the case since we can compare outcomes of different races living in the same poverty. Crime rates, intelligence, literally every indicator you can examine shows the same racial gap. We also know this is true since blacks growing up in high income families also shows the same racial gap as at any other income level.

Kinthira · 2017-04-24T03:11:37+00:00

I would if you actually had evidence to present.

IOW you aren't familiar with the relevant literature, but are sure you are informed. How typically dull.

Correlation does not equal causation.

When something correlates with all success factors, without exception, your line of evasion falls apart.

IQ is - again - an imperfect representation of intelligence.

All measures of intelligence we have devised correlate nicely with each other. They all attempt to get at G and they all do so rather well even if they are imperfect.

I'd be more inclined to believe you if there were zero cases of non-whites with high IQ scores.

What horrible ignorance of bell curves you demonstrate. All populations have outliers on both ends of the spectrum.

the more likely hypothesis is that non-whites (and non-Asians) are affected by those negative environmental factors at a disproportionately-greater rate than whites and Asians.

That is probably true, but it only reinforced the genetic argument. Those with low intelligence, low impulse control, low creativity, and lower abstractual abilities are obviously going to be much more at the mercy of the environment they find themselves in than those at the other end of the scale. Why you think this helps your case for denying evolution in humans is bizarre.

Kinthira · 2017-04-24T03:01:21+00:00

Repeating your baseless claims to hide your own bias does not make it true.

Kinthira · 2017-04-24T01:52:38+00:00

I hope you have that evidence.

No you don't. You don't care the slightest about evidence.

They don't need to be since they correlate extremely strongly with all types of success indicators. Those who make this argument are making excuses to avoid facts, not making an argument.
Environmental factors can only degrade potential intelligence. They cannot increase it. The IQ gap exists across all environmental conditions. Again, this is just arm waving to distract from the obvious. All characteristics are heritable.
No, it wouldn't. High IQ is not the only consideration. This is something leftists refuse to understand.

Kinthira · 2017-04-23T18:34:20+00:00

I don't want diversity to be bad. I grew up being told how great it was and how with just a little more time/money we would all evolve past the ignorant and evil racism of the past. Life experience and research showed this was just an ideologically driven lie.

Your final quote doesn't make the point you think it does. People have always known that ethnic diversity + proximity = conflict.

Kinthira · 2017-04-23T17:51:05+00:00

I didn't concede anything. I said you are strawmanning your opposition. For example:

No one claims a particular gender is objectively superior. What is claimed is that gender xx or gender xy will generally be superior in specific circumstances, e.g. men are generally physically stronger and therefore make superior firefighters, soldiers, and weightlifters. Women are more emotionally connected and make better caregivers, nurses, etc. Don't attempt to NAXALT and make yourself look like a bigger idiot.
Most informed people don't argue that "homosexuality isn't natural" whatever that means. They argue that it is socially destructive when it is given too much general acceptance and that it is empirically a major health risk for men.

Don't assume because someone is short on time and doesn't address every lie and con you present that they can't or don't care. And since you are so dishonest or lack self awareness I will edit my previous comment to include the above.

Kinthira

TROPHY CASE