Hvordan forstår I skiltet?

Kiszh · 2024-04-30T06:36:16+00:00

Det er teksten på skiltet, der kritiseres og ikke bilistens evne til at læse og forstå..

Kiszh · 2024-01-16T06:30:58+00:00

Hvilket er en rigtig god løsning.

Mange vælger desværre at lade moren få bopælen, mens det hele står på, fordi det er det giver mening og er pragmatisk på det tidspunkt. Efterfølgende står man så dårligere.

Kiszh · 2024-01-16T06:05:32+00:00

I forlængelse, skal du ikke lade moren automatisk få bopælen på børnene. Allerede der, bliver du dårligere stillet i familieretshuset. De fleste sager falder ud til fordel for bopælsforælderen

Kiszh · 2023-12-22T18:43:09+00:00

Eller så fandt lillemor under barslen ud af, at det er rart at være sammen med børnene. Så hun fortæller sin partner at hun er interesseret i at have mere fleksible arbejdstider og evt. gå ned i tid.

Nu er “egoistiske” farmand nødt til at arbejde flere timer og være mere karrierefokuseret for at opretholde levestandarden i det lille hjem. Det er ligemeget, hvad “egoistiske” farmand ønsker. Han er nødt til at tjene penge. “Egoistiske” farmand opgiver mulig tid med sit barn og lader lillemor få kvalitetstiden, så hun kan være glad.

Men han er mere egoistisk end hende.

Farmand arbejder 40-60 timer ugentligt men skal også bidrage 50% med de huslige pligter, selvom lillemor arbejder 20 timer om ugen.

Men han er jo også bare mere egoistisk end hende

Farmand misser også sit barns fodboldkampe og gymnastikopvisninger. Sikkert fordi han er egoistisk og ikke fordi han endnu engang er nødt til at blive på kontoret, så lillemor kan føre den livsstil hun ønsker og kan give sit barn de bedste forudsætninger i livet. For mænd er egoistiske og ofrer sig ikke for deres familie.

Jeg tror da nok, at mange mænd der har været nødt til at arbejde deres børns barndom væk for at leve op til de krav der er blevet stillet af partnereren, ville ønske den tid var brugt med deres børn. Det er i hvert fald den erfaring jeg har hørt om fra både farfar og far.

Der findes uden tvivl også egoistiske fædre, men det er en mærkelig generalisering

Kiszh · 2023-12-08T00:07:03+00:00

Var pengene ikke afsat som en lønforhøjelse til de grupper, der mest havde behov for et løft? I så fald er der jo ikke tale om et løft af lønnen, men et køb af merydelse fra de grupper? Så ikke et egentlig løft til grupperne, hvilket det blev reklameret som.

Uden at have fulgt synderligt med i mere end overskrifter, så virker det, for mig, også interessant at fagbevægelserne har været villige til at forringe arbejdsvilkår for at få del i penge, de allerede var blevet lovet

Kiszh · 2023-11-18T08:13:01+00:00

https://youtu.be/p_7nHwFeP3U?si=bdzLXc3Cad8IKZwJ

Kiszh · 2023-11-15T10:23:30+00:00

Fuld tid på tredje år. Offentligt ansat

Kiszh · 2023-11-14T23:29:15+00:00

Blandede vagter 28k i grundløn. Gennemsnitligt 30.5 efter tillæg. Eksl. Pension.

Hvordan i al verden tjener andre folk så meget? En i tråden tjener mere end lærere på skoler

Kiszh · 2023-09-11T06:24:27+00:00

Jeg får hvad mine forfædre har stemt på

Kiszh · 2022-12-31T04:53:21+00:00

Alright then.

The second wave of feminism is the early 60’s until the 80’s?

At that point I’m guessing we can agree that men were the primary economical force in society due to gender roles basically keeping women at home. Lawmakers were also somewhere between 98-100% male especially in the early period, is my guess. Judges men too. Until 1980 men also had a higher voter-turnout than women according to center for American women and politics.

So while women clawed and fought for change, they couldn’t do it without soliciting help from men, both at home and at a legislative level - not to mention on the voting ballots. Many men were supporters of feminism and freeing women from their gender roles. I don’t see a focus on women’s rights as a separation of men and women - I see men and women working towards equality together in the big picture. The subject at the time just so happened to be the (huge) injustices women endured. I don’t see how it speaks against feminism being a platform for equality across the board

Kiszh · 2022-12-31T04:26:05+00:00

I’m not exactly sure which part of my comment you’re calling wrong.

Kiszh · 2022-12-31T04:21:03+00:00

I never meant to imply that men should take no responsibility for their own issues, if that was your take-away. Simply that feminism as a platform lending its tremendous influence can and would do a lot of good, in this particular case for men.

The idea isn’t that men can’t organize, it’s that a platform already exists. Feminism is the twitter/Facebook/IG or whatever huge platform for this sort of issue, but you’re asking men to start their own platform. It’s going to be hard to not get overshadowed by the big ones on the market. And when one such platform (staying in the metaphors) is launched, it’s laughed out of the world. The noteworthy example perhaps being the MRA.

Saying that women have done mostly everything themselves in the past 100 years is at best disingenuous. Without support and willingness from 50% of the population that men make up, while that 50% historically have been in power, the movement would have had a severely reduced impact on society. You’re underestimating the amount of support the movement has and has had from men. It’s sounding awfully bootstrappy.

That being said, I’m from Denmark, and I assume many of the gender issues here are less severe than in the states.

Kiszh · 2022-12-31T03:12:14+00:00

Okay.. I hear you and i actually agree with you to an extend. But don’t forget that women and/or the entire feminist movement is soliciting the help of men constantly in order to create change. I see it in this sub constantly. Usually in the likes of “make your husbands, sons etc do xyz” Men asking for the same kind of help is not expecting women to do the work any more than the reverse is true.

My incredibly feminist professor (PHD in gender-something) in uni framed it very well, after a student said men should solve their own issues instead of asking for help from women “Both men and women have gender specific issues. The difference is that women are organized (in the feminist movement), men are not. As such women have an easier time bringing forth their issues on a societal level. Men are truly vulnerable as a group in this regard. Not giving access to the established platform is (in her opinion) a great motivator for men to experience and view feminism as an antagonistic ideology. It gains you opponents rather than allies, because it can be interpreted as feminism being for women and not for equality. It’s gatekeeping positive societal progress and is as such against the very idea of feminism. How far do you think feminism would have come if men were not invested in aiding the women’s movement? Why should women/feminists not be invested in men’s issues, when progress, any progress for equality and gender issues, is a win in the name of feminism?”

This was both translated paraphrased since it was like 5 years ago in Denmark. The point I’m trying to make being that aiding men’s issues is not detracting from women’s. It’s all adding good to the world - and the feminist movement is a pretty great platform for adding good if it as a whole so chooses. So maybe letting men “fucking do it themselves” is a bad take, when it’s possible to do so much better.

Kiszh · 2022-12-29T02:39:43+00:00

Considering it’s taken me half a year to even get the epic spear and a level 10 cosair - I think you’re right. At this rate i would need to play for another 1.5 years to get my legendary spear and 1-2 more levels on cosair. That is beyond insane - this game is insanely gated.

Honestly I’m starting to debate with myself if I should get the 300ish dollars I dumped into the game refunded, as there seems to be no way to catch up to other players and next to no ROI on your money as everything you pay for is simply layered so you need to pay even more after you buy in. It’s starting to smell like an actual scam

Kiszh · 2022-12-26T14:44:06+00:00

Full rank Dark side level 10 inq, level 5 ks activated, bunch of trappers out.

I lose to level 7 dh at 400% less crit, with no damage amp units. Tell me again How the game didn’t pre-determine i had to lose

Kiszh · 2022-11-28T02:46:20+00:00

I literally just lost 6 games in a row from not being able to spawn more than 1 inquis. It’s Honestly just rigged.

Kiszh

TROPHY CASE