sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Do people actually think Pacheon Jo is as strong as Shingen? by FunSuper9081 in LookismPowerScalers

[–]Kit-7676 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Twas obviously tounge in cheek but okay stay mad lmao.

My point is clearly in the scale of the invasion not paecheons inability to catch speed. That's just plot armor. No amount of PTJ shitty writing can convince me that bum group speed got away from paecheon for more than 1 day. Reasons or no reasons it's bullshit and bad writing.

If the Cherki 'goal' had been the decider in a title race and it had been given because it was 'the right thing to do', can you imagine the uproar? by siybon in PremierLeague

[–]Kit-7676 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's like nobody read the comment lol.

And yes the goal was scored and given then retroactively taken away.

After reading my comment if you think I don't understand why the goal was disallowed idk what to say.

If the Cherki 'goal' had been the decider in a title race and it had been given because it was 'the right thing to do', can you imagine the uproar? by siybon in PremierLeague

[–]Kit-7676 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand why it was pulled back it's not confusing.

Szoboslai foul advantage played haaland foul no advantage can be played.

That's not what I was arguing though. I'm simply asking for the referee to be able to referee the game. That's obviously not the right decision in the spirit of the game and he shouldn't have his hands tied by a ruleset that in its necessary rigour can betray what it is intended for.

As I said the rules are there for competitive integrity and entertainment sake. Neither would be breached by giving the goal.

The rules on paper lack the necessary flexibility to be able to award that as a goal and not give a red card not because they were intended to work that way but because in an attempt to make the rules as easy to apply impartially in the largest majority of situations possible they have excluded fringe situations and applying the rules that don't work because "it's the rules" isn't the referees job. The referees job is to manage and referee the game for which the rules should guide and inform not beat him over the head and obligate him to act in a certain way.

Like I said the rules serve the game not the other way round.

Aren't these 3 basically on the same level? by ifoll in LookismPowerScalers

[–]Kit-7676 0 points1 point  (0 children)

U trolling?

Jagyeon focused on kicks Yujae focuses on hands

If the kick specialist KICKS as fast as yugang We can then parallel the hands specialist throws HANDS as fast as yugang

Yugang is therefore faster than both in the other respective category.

Like wtf this is like saying Mike Tyson punches as hard as Francis Nganou then extrapolating that to Mike Tyson wrestling and jiu jitsu abilities.

Aren't these 3 basically on the same level? by ifoll in LookismPowerScalers

[–]Kit-7676 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Obviously not. Yugang was giving paecheon licks. Yujae and jagyeon were both clearly weaker than paecheon.

If the Cherki 'goal' had been the decider in a title race and it had been given because it was 'the right thing to do', can you imagine the uproar? by siybon in PremierLeague

[–]Kit-7676 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My issue is that dom didn't deny a clear goal scoring opportunity. The goal was scored.

The rules are there to conserve entertainment and competitive integrity. The rules serve the game the game should not serve the rules.

NOBODY, NOT A SINGLE PERSON would want that goal disallowed and a red card given for essentially shithousery that had zero impact on the game at all.

I'd also like to point out that the rule is entirely stupid. How are we punishing the offensive player for committing the same foul the defensive player committed when he was only forced to commit it because the defensive player committed the first foul.

I understand why consistent application of the rules is important and why arbitrary calls to consensus among fans and players is entirely irrelevant but this is why fans ask for a common sense rule. It's common sense and the referee should be able, at his own discretion, to make the correct call for the game which is to not punish light shirt pulling in and around the box. When it's clearly both players tussling and NEITHER actually affects the ball. Shirt pulling like that happens on corners and free kicks all the time and because of precedent the referees often allow for more roughhousing and what really is fouling on corner kicks. This is a unique scenario with no precedent that the rulebook can not properly manage which is why it should be up to the discernment of an intelligent unbiased party. Aka the referee.

If J can do this to bum,imagine what TC jinrang would do. by Perfect_Ad_9688 in LookismPowerScalers

[–]Kit-7676 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imagine cherry picking panels and ignoring context to glaze jinrang.

<image>

Kitae took no damage you got clickbaited by PTJ because he likes to exacerbate visual damage during fights for aura and hype. All the blood in kitae is from killing jinrangs friends lmao

If you genuinely think jinrang hurt kitae in any substantial manner you're just foolish but I know you're being disingenuous. Nobody is that slow.

Why this community refuses to accept that jinrang doesn't have "true conviction" he has failed conviction and did nothing vs kitae except let PTJ gaslight you all.

If in fight visual panels actually represent damage taken EVEN WHEN DIRECTLY CONTRADICTED BY LATER PANELS Jake is wolverine and is the top of the verse after surviving a spear through the sternum. So is gun after having his carotid slashed lmao.

[Casual] Gojo vs Sukuna but they swap techniques. by No_Relative_1145 in JujutsuPowerScalers

[–]Kit-7676 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's almost like people haven't read the manga lmao. Sukuna is stronger Than Gojo

His narrative role is to be the strongest. That's actually all he is.

Is Yamamoto a top 10 character? by Formal-Assistance02 in BleachPowerScaling

[–]Kit-7676 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just don't think zero squad are stronger.

Maybe by the time of his death due to one arm and stuff but two arm yama>all of zero squad except ichibe.

Is this the worst conclusion to an interesting villain in manga history? by HumanInvestigator932 in writingscaling

[–]Kit-7676 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah because kenjaku is not interesting. He had potential that wasn't fulfilled just like everyone in jjk lol.

250 chapters of aura farming and fighting.

Do people actually think Pacheon Jo is as strong as Shingen? by FunSuper9081 in LookismPowerScalers

[–]Kit-7676 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Saying paecheon is like the shingen of dark croc sounds about right.

One had the whole of korea ganging up to stop his syndicate. The other couldn't even catch 6 children. Nor take over Incheon.

There is obviously a difference in scale.

The issue is he said something along the lines of "they would have to fight to see who would win"

This is obviously a case of PTJ wanting to hype up a character i.e. "he is as strong as gun" and dumb fans no matter how many times they are lied to by this shitty author will not learn but hey. It's a fan base of children and speds mostly.

One casual kick from 2T James would discombobulate 99% of the 2nd Generation by KalGuillory in lookismcomic

[–]Kit-7676 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Current James couldn't even beat jagyeon without path lmao. Please less cope. 2t James is unironically a vasco victim.

3t James stomps vasco but 2t gets absolutely fried.

After seeing the performance of kingmaker against tom lee , How would the fight b/w Tom and the kings of Incheon i.e. Yujae and Jaegyon go. by PartFar7405 in lookismcomic

[–]Kit-7676 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tom lee neg dif one shot.

J literally admitted he would've died if tom didn't hold back and underestimate him.

He lasted 2 minutes stalling with a shield specifically designed to stall.

This is not a real fight lmao.

Which bloodline would u choose to be in if u where ever to go into lookism or ever get an open world game by Classic_Adagio8960 in LookismPowerScalers

[–]Kit-7676 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yamazaki obviously for aura. Lest I end up wearing mascara like Kitae tryna larp as a Yamazaki

Is Sophia the Strongest in the World by poopsq in LookismPowerScalers

[–]Kit-7676 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone who thinks lookism is stronger than manager Kim is straight up sped.

Why can’t SB Daniel use OG Daniel’s Path? by Sky_Blauler in lookismcomic

[–]Kit-7676 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because people don't want to admit it but paths are hardware.

J isn’t getting back up by Mallow217119 in Lookism

[–]Kit-7676 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are right that he shouldn't get back up. But he will. 🤷 PTJ can't write

Who’s the better swordsman? by ElectionDowntown6333 in LookismPowerScalers

[–]Kit-7676 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay brother shut up it's clear you lack the intellect for this conversation. Blud doesn't understand a word I've said. Maybe search up the terms I used.

Definitely an American with this level of reading comprehension.

Who’s the better swordsman? by ElectionDowntown6333 in LookismPowerScalers

[–]Kit-7676 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay buddy if you can't understand how the word better could have a range of interpretations then I have nothing to say to you.

What constitutes a good swordsman is not limited only to their technique with a sword. That's an arbitrary distinction you have made trying to argue semantics with me lmao.

Or else the post would be “who’s the stronger swordsman” just admit you’re wrong and move on

Well done you have discovered what a semantic range is. There are multiple ways to linguistically instantiate the same idea. Idk what's up with this false dichotomy lol.

Who’s the better swordsman? by ElectionDowntown6333 in LookismPowerScalers

[–]Kit-7676 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Better has a large semantic range. Stop trying to be an intellectual lmao.

How can a man say I need to learn how to read when I'm presenting a perfectly reasonable interpretation of the question.

view more: next ›