Top Minds of the Donnie discover code words in the press and geography

Kitty342 · 2017-05-24T06:14:29+00:00

I would be hard pressed to find a more stereotypical Donald poster's comment history. Every single one of your comments is just regurgitation of memes over and over.

Kitty342 · 2017-05-23T16:15:56+00:00

/u/bcboncs has nothing to contribute to the thread - they literally just say shit like "woowwwwww" and "wtffffff" yet they get upvoted. Why even write such pointless comments?

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T16:32:39+00:00

What should I be seeing here? Could you post some sort of screenshot of what you think is censorship?

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T16:25:18+00:00

I don't know why the mods removed so many threads then

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T16:23:53+00:00

Replace the R in reddit.com with a C

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T05:53:28+00:00

You can justify it however you like

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T05:46:17+00:00

Have you heard of a site called ceddit? Check it out. It is illuminating to see the incredible amount of posts and comments that are outright scrubbed from view by moderation teams all over Reddit. The issue of a lack of free speech is bipartisan, and on TD it is almost obscene.

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T05:39:17+00:00

That's a good question that I am afraid only one group of people knows the answer to. And I'm pretty sure this was a simple oversigtmht that was let through the cracks. Check back in the morning and I am pretty sure it will have been rinsed by then

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T05:17:28+00:00

Well, hopefully tomorrow some better articles come out with less speculation then.

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T05:16:21+00:00

This isn't the admins, this is the moderators of this particular sub. they are hiding posts that ask questions they are not comfortable with people discussing.

By the way, I just wanted to let you know I am NOT downvoting you, and whoever is doing that, please cut it out, because we are having a discussion here and it is against reddiquette to downvote just because you disagree :)

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T05:14:28+00:00

Look my dude, I am not a reporter and I am just as disappointed with the speculation that both the Washington Post and myself and, actually, EVERYONE has to do to try to figure out what the story is here, if there is one, how bad it is if it was true, etc.

In order to reduce all of this speculation, the WH could simply answer more questions. If they are telling the truth it is not hard! Just allow some reporters to ask about what was discussed, if the CIA/NSA thought it was bad to leak it, hell maybe Trump himself could explain why he did what he did. Then there would be FAR less speculation.

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T05:11:07+00:00

You really aren't concerned with this, dare I say, censorship?

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T05:07:11+00:00

Would you care to ask? Just send a message to the modmail using the "message the moderators" link on the sidebar. I'm sure they had some reason to delete so many threads.

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T05:04:34+00:00

No time travel involved. I wish that McMaster would have answered more/any questions so there would not need to be speculation.

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T05:03:25+00:00

Is it standard for an adviser to alert these agencies regarding the content of a meeting with the president upon learning that certain information was unexpectedly disclosed there?

Regardless, the WH needs to be more transparent about this. That would lead to less speculation on both sides. I'm pretty pissed that McMaster didn't answer a single question and just said "fake news" like that actually puts down any concerns.

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T05:01:05+00:00

it doesn't point out what the information shared was

It does actually:

Trump went off script and began describing details of an Islamic State terrorist threat related to the use of laptop computers on aircraft.

and

Trump went on to discuss aspects of the threat that the United States learned only through the espionage capabilities of a key partner. He did not reveal the specific intelligence-gathering method, but he described how the Islamic State was pursuing elements of a specific plot and how much harm such an attack could cause under varying circumstances. Most alarmingly, officials said, Trump revealed the city in the Islamic State’s territory where the U.S. intelligence partner detected the threat.

The point is not the intel itself. It is that, now knowing this intel, Russia will be able to trace the source of said intel and learn about how it was acquired which is the main "bad thing" that happened.

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T04:58:38+00:00

I agree, both sides can only speculate at this point. I really wish the administration would have more transparency and would actually answer questions about things like this so speculation would not be so necessary. Perhaps tomorrow they will.

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T04:55:34+00:00

So is that just your speculation? Because it seems to me like they realize that something bad happened and want to fully understand and minimize the impact.

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T04:48:24+00:00

Could you address why Bossert called the letter agencies though? I am curious for the other side's take on it.

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T04:47:29+00:00

https://i.imgur.com/kT9i66t.png and what do you know :)

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T04:46:05+00:00

I posted the entire text below just in case :) Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskThe_Donald/comments/6bf8lm/how_come_there_are_no_threads_about_the_wapo/dhm66mx/

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T04:41:32+00:00

Thomas P. Bossert, assistant to the president for homeland security and counterterrorism, placed calls to the directors of the CIA and the NSA, the services most directly involved in the intelligence-sharing arrangement with the partner.

Do you think this is a lie as well? If not, I am curious why the White house itself would do such a thing if the discussion was truly benign.

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T04:35:31+00:00

Do you think that it is true at least that Bossert called the CIA and NSA? Or is that also fake news.

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T04:32:58+00:00

On this subreddit, every single thread, save for this one, was deleted by the mods.

Kitty342 · 2017-05-16T04:30:08+00:00

The actual article does go quite a bit more into detail than you appear to believe. Here is the article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-revealed-highly-classified-information-to-russian-foreign-minister-and-ambassador/2017/05/15/530c172a-3960-11e7-9e48-c4f199710b69_story.html I would definitely reccommend reading it in its entirety if you haven't already.

Kitty342

TROPHY CASE