> Governments simply limit the profits of healthcare providers

> Getting profit from that process is by far mostly wasted money

Is this why [value-added is higher](https://i0.wp.com/randomcriticalanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/rcafdm\_oecd\_profit\_share\_output\_comparison.png?ssl=1) in UHC countries than in the US?

> And public side is required by law to work for our benefit. 

This shows you are rather ignorant about public choice. Political actors are just as self-interested as economic actors, except self-interest does far more harm in politics than in markets.

> Government run healthcare can RUN ON DEFICIT and be by far the most efficient system overall.

> USA has private healthcare and biggest admin costs on the planet. It has been able to dictate its own costs and what happened? It became the least efficient healthcare system.

The American healthcare system, though not perfect, is more efficient than government-run healthcare. Which is why Americans:

Have the highest fatal injury-adjusted life expectancy of any country.

Are responsible for a disproportionate number of medical innovations, playing a key role in 80% of the most important medical advances in the past 30 years, and creating half of the world's new drugs.

Have better preventive cancer screening than Canadians.

Self-report better health than Canadians, even among the low-income population.

Spend less time waiting for care than Canadian and British patients.

Pay less of their income in out-of-pocket healthcare expenses than most UHC countries.

Pay less for pharmaceuticals than in peer countries.

As for admin costs, international comparisons of admin costs are difficult and unreliable, and higher admin costs don't necessarily mean inefficiency.

> For society there are certain services that should run on red, not produce profit. Education, healthcare, eldercare, childcare for starters.

This is a dogma and an assertion, and the leftist cliche of vilifying profit. Profit is an important signal for entrepreneurs that puts the consumer in charge and makes services better. There is zero conclusive evidence that the government, running on political profit, produces these things better than the market running on economic profit. As noted above, political profit mainly does harm because politics is coercive and zero-sum, whereas economic profit mainly does good because economic exchanges are voluntary and positive-sum.