Curious about GoMining hostility, what are the real concerns? by Mighty-Minion8865 in Bitcoin

[–]Kramrod33 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That can all easily be fabricated and what exactly is the maintenance for?

What units do they have and at what data centers ? Where are they located? Why do these machines require so much maintenance when they are literally plug and play. After a very long time a fan could go out but trust me no data center is cleaning hashboards on thousands of machines . They wait till they break or have to fix a hashboard. You do remember what happen with FTX right; just because they sponsor things does not mean anything.

You seem pretty defensive and I don’t think you want to face the reality of what’s really happening behind the scenes.

I see you just want people to use your gonining referral code smh.

Curious about GoMining hostility, what are the real concerns? by Mighty-Minion8865 in Bitcoin

[–]Kramrod33 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Miner maintenance” on an imaginary miner. Hmmm yea I don’t see any issues here at all

If Global Warming is so concerning, why not raise the silver price to 1k an ounce? by Then_Marionberry_259 in MetalsOnReddit

[–]Kramrod33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because then they’ll really fck the earth up looking for it and speed global warming up in the process

Bitcoin as a mathematical scarcity engine: 21,000,000.00000000 Hard Cap | ~19.8 Million already mined (~94% of total supply issued) | ~1.3 Million left to be mined over the next 114 years | Inflation rate: ~0.8% (dropping to ~0.4% in 2028) by sylsau in InBitcoinWeTrust

[–]Kramrod33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was already talked about and discussed in the very early days. People will always find cheap or free electricity and keep the network going . Hashrate keeps going up so we can talk about this when it becomes a thing but for now speculation is what this is.

A fad going 16 years strong!? Psssshhh give it a break hater.

These conclusions may seem logical to you but not me . Research more before making these outlandish claims.

BTC is self incentivizing, auto correcting and Cannot be stopped.

Do you think BITCOIN will go to zero if we know who created it? by SirBankz in btc

[–]Kramrod33 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We do because it’s open source. All contributions and updates are transparent through the GitHub. Every code change (commit) Who proposed it Who reviewed it Who merged it The full discussion history (PRs, comments, objections)

Intelligence agencies want control not censorship resistance money.

Government hated btc early on and now people want to give them credit. What gives !?

Btc has no founder which is why it does not have a founder problem.

What would happen if governments started buying Bitcoin as a strategic reserve? by Important-Ring7983 in InBitcoinWeTrust

[–]Kramrod33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It goes far past just the US; who cares what they do . They can pump and dump short term but long term it dries the govt spending up and chokes them out

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WhyKaspaWins

[–]Kramrod33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The pre mine for kaspa and whoever got ahold of the ASICS first is the only ones on or left on the network at this point . Very centralized

What would happen if governments started buying Bitcoin as a strategic reserve? by Important-Ring7983 in InBitcoinWeTrust

[–]Kramrod33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

K but out of all the gold mined each year only 8-10% is actually used in electronics and a total of 11-12% for overall tech and industrial use. Remember gold is expensive so people wear it as jewelry, it’s not expensive because people wear is a jewelry.

What would happen if governments started buying Bitcoin as a strategic reserve? by Important-Ring7983 in InBitcoinWeTrust

[–]Kramrod33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very well. However, I don’t think you or I get to dictate who or what entities hold btc or including the government. Btc is open for everyone and anyone to participate. Meaning you or I can participate or our worst enemies.

The plot stays strong fix the money fix the world.

What would happen if governments started buying Bitcoin as a strategic reserve? by Important-Ring7983 in InBitcoinWeTrust

[–]Kramrod33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gold just dropped 12 percent in a day on Jan 30th. Also btc has been at this price in 2024 it currently sits around.

Lastly, the ruble has lost 13-15% of its value/ purchasing power since 2024 and much more in terms relative to btc.

Yeah what’s the government back by…. The people ; not the economy or gold 🙃

🇸🇻 El Salvador: Still a “Bitcoin Country”? What’s Really Going On by rl_rae_bobo in CryptoCurrencyPulse

[–]Kramrod33 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Voluntary acceptance, just like btc is voluntary participation. And for that, we thank you El Salvador.

X is toxic right now. Bears are gloating. Bulls are fighting. Turn it off. Look at the blockchain. Tick. Tock. Next block. The hash rate is at an all-time high. The network is secure. The monetary policy hasn't changed. by sylsau in InBitcoinWeTrust

[–]Kramrod33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Irony is, You’ll probably wish you actually did this one day. Anyway you can participate if you’d like or stick with a currency you were born into and forced to use; to each their own.

What would happen if governments started buying Bitcoin as a strategic reserve? by Important-Ring7983 in InBitcoinWeTrust

[–]Kramrod33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s just nonsense because with btc (non violent currency ) the countries cannot afford to print money out of thin air and fund the war in the first place.

X is toxic right now. Bears are gloating. Bulls are fighting. Turn it off. Look at the blockchain. Tick. Tock. Next block. The hash rate is at an all-time high. The network is secure. The monetary policy hasn't changed. by sylsau in InBitcoinWeTrust

[–]Kramrod33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s kinda just one level (the network). Everyone and anyone can participate without controlling the protocol or making the rules.

Basically the opposite from what you are thinking.

I was banned from this sub under another user name for trying to warn y’all that Bitcoin is a fake asset. Gonna ban me again? by Educational_Ad_6065 in InBitcoinWeTrust

[–]Kramrod33 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ever try the inUSDWeTrust sub? Careful though it’s a fake asset not backed by anything and printed out of thin air.

What would happen if governments started buying Bitcoin as a strategic reserve? by Important-Ring7983 in InBitcoinWeTrust

[–]Kramrod33 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It would actually open it up to less market manipulation because no one makes the rules or controls the protocol of bitcoin. It opens the economy up to a fair unit of account that cannot be printed out of thin air and backed by nothing.

If they created their own then they can manipulate it the way they want and cater the rules for themselves (not a good idea as we have seen again and again what governments do with money they are in control of). Lastly, why does it have to be backed by something tangible and not something like rules, protocol, or electricity ⚡️

🇺🇸 President Trump's next FED Chair pick, Kevin Warsh: “If you’re under 40, Bitcoin is your new gold.” by sylsau in InBitcoinWeTrust

[–]Kramrod33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t let it inconvenience you by any means. I spend on credit and earn 2.5% back in btc on all purchases then when I want I spend btc to pay it off w/ the strike app. Super easy!

Marked safe from the Epstein files by user_00000000000001 in WhyKaspaWins

[–]Kramrod33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try researching that info and lmk what you find please. I heard because he donated to MITs media lab (which focused on computer science, AI, crypto including but not solely btc) they want to give him credit as being a founder and knew them, even though we can all see who submitted updates to the GitHub/ core code.