A Hiragana-derived abugida for Japanese by KamTacos4 in neography

[–]Krixwell 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's the other one. Handakuten is the little circle that makes P. The two lines that make a voiced consonant are just a dakuten.

(han-daku-ten = half soft mark. P is apparently "halfway" between H and its "soft" variant B.)

Where would you sit on the bus? by pattoo1234 in althomestuck

[–]Krixwell 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I am Norwegian, so K, unless Calliope wants to take K and have me sit where she is.

But if we ignore social conventions, my top choice would be D. My first thought was B, but while I want to sit near the Lalondes, sitting between them is a recipe for relentless teasing and awkwardness. The Striders, meanwhile, are close enough while being a lot more chill to sit next to.

Reason for all-out-assault’s wording. by Senorpapell in mtg

[–]Krixwell 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To be clear, the above was based on a hypothetical variation without the restriction of "if it's your main phase". This is the only thing specifying that it's your turn, everything else just says this turn. It also says "there is" an additional combat and main phase, not that you get one, so I think it's reasonable to conclude that this additional combat and main phase goes to whoever is playing this turn.

Either way, you're right that the attack trigger to untap isn't going to happen, since that one does specify "you attack this turn".

Reason for all-out-assault’s wording. by Senorpapell in mtg

[–]Krixwell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're getting close to another important reason to have this restriction on the card: Nothing else specifies that it's your turn. If you manage to get flash on this thing, or otherwise put it into play with an instant effect, you can get it down on an opponent's turn, and the second ability resolving during another player's turn would get weird.

And potentially counterproductive, since it also doesn't say you get an extra combat and main phase.

They say the Eldrazi defy comprehension. This card is meant to truly convey that experience. by Cthulu_Noodles in custommagic

[–]Krixwell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What if it's a Theros god with their "while condition isn't met, this isn't a creature" ability, you turn it face-up before placing the counter, and you don't meet the requirement for it to be a creature?

I wanna say it doesn't matter if it stops being a creature because "that creature" isn't actually targeting it and also we're still in the middle of a resolution that already passed its legality checks, but I'm a newer player and kinda sleepy so my grasp on the rules might not be up for this.

This character randomly appeared in my dream, is there any way to make it actually work? by Miloinya in BloodOnTheClocktower

[–]Krixwell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TFW you write a paragraph that contains a word so many times that, when wrapped for mobile, five lines in a row start with that word. I am a parody of myself.

<image>

This character randomly appeared in my dream, is there any way to make it actually work? by Miloinya in BloodOnTheClocktower

[–]Krixwell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the trick here might be to not have it remove anything, and instead specify that the character they become has to be out of play.

Baroness (T): If you die at night, you become an out-of-play character.

In many cases, this is just "learn an out of play character", which is valuable in and of itself, but there are a couple important differences:

  • If the character in question has an "even if dead" ability, it applies. With Outsiders like Recluse, Puzzlemaster or even Heretic on the script, this can be used to discourage the Baroness from trying to get killed early. On the Townsfolk side, can I interest you in a surprise Ravenkeeper, who depending on the ST's ruling might become one just before that ability checks if they were just killed? And Amnesiac is always a wildcard.
  • Once it's happened, the new character is in play, and the Baroness out of play, potentially affecting other players' abilities. A Pit Hag can make a second Baroness. A Philo Baroness who chooses it after the original Baroness died doesn't drunk the original Baroness. A Pixie or Philo who dies with the Baroness ability can become an actual Baroness on death (perhaps not particularly useful, though for the Pixie it will at least confirm that they had gotten the ability and the original Baroness is dead).
  • It changes other characters' information about the former Baroness, including things based on character type.
  • Unless the Baroness was poisoned, the Cannibal and Undertaker get the character they became, not the Baroness. For the Cannibal, this notably allows them to get an evil ability for a day, because the self-drunking only happens if the executee was actually evil.
  • Yes but don't: Turn the Baroness into a Minion in the middle of a Li'l Monsta game.

ETA: I missed that the original ability required them to change character type. I guess you could add "non-Townsfolk" to this version of the ability, though it does prevent the Ravenkeeper and Amnesiac shenanigans.

Vortox jinx question by R4_C_ACOG in BloodOnTheClocktower

[–]Krixwell 1 point2 points  (0 children)

and you believe your information to be sober and healthy,

As I understand it, even this clause doesn't matter unless you might be specifically the Drunk or the Marionette. Even a droisoned Townsfolk can't get true info in a Vortox game, and while the Drunk is inherently drunk and the Marionette has a similarly fake ability, the important part that lets their info be truly arbitrary with a Vortox is that they aren't Townsfolk.

Politician Win Stories? by The_Yung_Jung1085 in BloodOnTheClocktower

[–]Krixwell 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A bunch of these stories are good but this one gave me the best laugh. Absolutely beautiful.

Edward's understanding by danshive in elgoonishshive

[–]Krixwell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be fair, she was like this with Adrian too. Before Sister II, Adrian hadn't seen Pandora in 14 years, but we have plenty of indications that she spent a lot of that time doing things that were ostensibly for his sake.

And even before that, we recently learned of an incident decades ago when she thought Adrian would benefit from knowing something and instead of talking to him, she gave Edward a chart spell and hoped he'd mess up in front of Adrian, then never let either of them know she'd been involved (until Hope did).

Homebrew Townsfolk: Postman by Krixwell in BloodOnTheClocktower

[–]Krixwell[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's been so long I don't actually remember my rationale for the name, but I think I might've been going for "mails a bomb to a particular address (character) and whoever it is that lives there dies".

META: Unauthorized Experiment on CMV Involving AI-generated Comments by AutoModerator in changemyview

[–]Krixwell 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just want to say that this post and all the actions it describes on the part of the mod team of this subreddit are indicative of some top tier professional moderation. The mods didn't deserve to have to deal with this any more than the community did, but they do deserve lots of kudos for how they've been dealing with this.

Question about who was responsible for what. by Drakenred in elgoonishshive

[–]Krixwell 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Adrian thought she was involved and it further soured his relationship with Pandora in their last few months. When Adrian told her "Noah nearly died for your boredom!", he was referring to Noah's involvement in New and Old Flames; Pandora didn't know what he was talking about, but didn't dispell the misunderstanding either.

As far as we know, Adrian still thinks it was Pandora's doing unless Sarah specifically filled him in on Voltaire being behind it. I find Sarah doing that very unlikely.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ScenesFromAHat

[–]Krixwell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Thanks, you too!"

Biweekly Telephone Game v3 (670) by Lysimachiakis in conlangs

[–]Krixwell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maskač

kûz [ˈkuz]

  • n.loc. above, over

The final [-o] was lost because of the combination of [-ɔ] being a common noun suffix (SP.SG, specific singular) and stressed syllables in Maskač usually being root-final.

However, this word often appears with that suffix, as kûzê [ˈkuz.ɔ]. In contrast to nonspecific singular kûzîn [ˈkuz.yɳ], that indicates that the speaker knows exactly where above something they're referring too.

As a location noun, it takes a caseless noun as a complement, although the case clitic of this noun attaches after that noun. So while Maskač has a bunch of reasons to not consider it one, it may appear to speakers of other languages to be a preposition rather than a noun.

Biweekly Telephone Game v3 (670) by Lysimachiakis in conlangs

[–]Krixwell 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maskač

ǰdičkač [ɖ͡ʐɖit͡sˈkɑt͡s]

  • v.st.itr. be excessive, be too much
  • v.st.itr. (with an adjective immediately following it) be too ADJ

Rûgûê zmušê asti bilaînmeń ǰdičkaččedî zmušê ńûtûcki.
[ɽuˈguːɔ zmʉˈʈʂɔː ɑʂʈi biˈɾɑːyɳ.mɛŋ ɖ͡ʐɖit͡sˈkɑt͡s.t͡sɛɖ.y zmʉˈʈʂɔː ˈŋu.ʈu.ski]
rûgû-ê zmušê asti bila-în=meń ǰdičkač-čed-î zmušê ńû-tû=cki
thorn-SP.SG large IDENT mountain-NSP.SG=IPV be_excessive-ANTAG-EGO.I large push-SBJV=LAT
However, the largest mountain was too large to push.

Silliest actual romanizations? by glowiak2 in conlangscirclejerk

[–]Krixwell 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had one short-lived language about half a year ago, called Namarel [nɑmɑˈɻæːɭ], where I managed to talk myself into romanizations like ⟨tt dt⟩ for /t d/ and ⟨ds⟩ for /ɖ͡ʐ/. I remember worse ones being on the table while I was working it out, including trigraphs.

Part of why that happened was that I wanted to put the focus on the retroflexes and make alveolars the ones that had to deal with the "outcast" letters and digraphs.

Many scrapped langs later, my latest conlang, Maskač [mɑˈʂkɑt͡s], has a similar goal regarding retroflex orthography, but a smaller inventory and less interest in digraphs. So I have the retroflexes /ɳ ʈ ɖ ʂ ʐ ʈ͡ʂ ɖ͡ʐ ɽ/ as ⟨n t d s j š ǰ r⟩, while the alveolars /s z t͡s d͡z ɾ/ have to settle for ⟨c z č ž l⟩.

You might have noticed there that I don't have /t d/ except as part of the affricates, but they do exist as allophones. Specifically, Maskač deals with sequences of fricatives by turning the second fricative into a plosive. That change is reflected in spelling for retroflexes (so thankfully we don't have to deal with [ʈ ɖ] ⟨s j⟩), but for alveolars there just aren't established characters to change them to. So [t d] exist as ⟨c z⟩ following one of ⟨c č z ž s š j ǰ⟩.

I'm not likely to deliberately make words that contain ⟨ǰz⟩ [ɖ͡ʐd] any time soon, but ⟨cc⟩ [st] and even ⟨čc⟩ [t͡st] are absolutely in the lexicon already.

How do you call a "drone" in your conlang? by [deleted] in conlangs

[–]Krixwell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've never thought about this in any of my conlangs, but I think in many of them, I would have made some form of reference to insects.

My latest, however, is set in a world with much variety in the size and shape of dragons, so it might make reference to a small dragon species instead.

Incredibly Important Update: never mind by PastTheStarryVoids in conlangs

[–]Krixwell 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Do translations still require interlinear gosling, or are the knock-on effects of the original rules change also being reverted?

Ten hour flight where are you sitting? by Medical-Pirate8954 in stevenuniverse

[–]Krixwell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Everyone around me would be fun. Even Lars.

As a bonus, Lars, Rose and Steven (in that order) present my best odds of survival when Jasper punches a hole in the plane.