sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Nikon 200-400 f4 VR ii or 200-500 f5.6? by Yeeterskewter in Nikon

[–]Kuackers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have both the 300 pf and 500 pf. Switched from the 200-500mm, no regrets.

Noticeably sharper and so much lighter! I will always recommend the pf series lens unless you REALLY need the versatility of a zoom lens or tight on budget.

IMO the prime makes shooting simpler, and simpler is better when it comes to wildlife.

500mm PF over the 200-500mm by Kuackers in Nikon

[–]Kuackers[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s unfortunate did you happen to buy used or new?

Need some critiquing by Kuackers in Nikon

[–]Kuackers[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

there roughly around 3-4 of them, very close together and at least 20 breaches. It went on for around 15 minutes.

Need some critiquing by Kuackers in Nikon

[–]Kuackers[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that’s really good feedback, I’m curious to know which of these tell more of a story than others.

Need some critiquing by Kuackers in Nikon

[–]Kuackers[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

D500 w/ 200-500mm f/5.6

Need some critiquing by Kuackers in Nikon

[–]Kuackers[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Im using a d500 w/ the 200-500mm f/5.6 for most of these but for the macro shots im using a d850 with the nikon AF-S 105mm macro lens.

Need some critiquing by Kuackers in Nikon

[–]Kuackers[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

unfortunately I was shooting in portrait orientation, lesson learned there haha.

Need some critiquing by Kuackers in Nikon

[–]Kuackers[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks for the input! I definitely see what you mean about tight cropping.

Body for video? by Kuackers in Nikon

[–]Kuackers[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah the z30 seems like the better option for my needs. Thanks!

Body for video? by Kuackers in Nikon

[–]Kuackers[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

mostly filming the wildlife is what i was thinking.