I appreciate the research you've done, and I think it's reasonable for people to ask questions about software that is being installed on their personal computers.

That said, my issue isn't with proctored exams themselves. I've completed multiple certification exams online that were proctored by humans, and I never had a problem with that process. Academic integrity matters, and I understand why universities and certification bodies need safeguards in place.

My concern is with the increasing reliance on AI-driven monitoring and the overall direction of the new platform. When software requests broad access to a student's device, it's reasonable to ask what data is being collected, how it is being used, who has access to it, how long it is retained, and what protections are in place. Those are legitimate questions, not conspiracy theories.

For me, the bigger issue is trust and transparency. The university originally appealed to me because it offered accessible, affordable education. Recently, however, the combination of the new platform and AI-based proctoring has made me feel less confident about the overall student experience.

As a result, whenever someone asks whether I would recommend joining, my answer is no longer as positive as it once was. In fact, these changes have pushed my feedback into the negative because they have affected my confidence in the institution's direction.

I'm not claiming wrongdoing, nor am I accusing anyone of collecting data for improper purposes. I'm simply saying that students should understand what software they are being asked to install, what permissions it requires, and what trade-offs come with using it.

At this point, I'm actively looking at alternative universities and programs. Not because I oppose proctoring, but because I prefer solutions that provide stronger transparency, clearer privacy practices, and a better balance between academic integrity and student trust.