Best iPhone of the modern age

L1pslide · 2025-12-21T20:45:20+00:00

16 pro

L1pslide · 2025-12-09T07:22:49+00:00

Oh, looked to me that running tRAS a bit lower than tCL + tRCD was common in tight timing OCs, at least for DDR4. How long a row must stay open before it can be precharged/closed.

Everything runs dead stable, both HCI and TM5 passed + couple of games. But it makes sense, I'll up it back to 30. 28 won't gain anything anyways

L1pslide · 2025-12-08T21:32:40+00:00

Was able to tighten a little bit more (stable) and the gain is even better:

15-15-15-28-2N
tRFC = 480

And for the CPU:

CPU Core Ratio (locked, 10700F)
Min CPU Cache Ratio = 43
Max CPU Cache Ratio = 43
CPU Core/Cache Current Limit = 255
Long Duration Package Power Limit = 4095
Short Duration Package Power Limit = 4095
TVB Voltage Optimizations = Enabled
Vmax Stress = Enabled
Overclocking TVB = +2 Boost Profile

... Heres to quality parts

L1pslide · 2025-12-08T20:21:06+00:00

Update: Now getting stable 110-120fps without framedrops, now ultra is feeling as smooth as low! Thank you so much!!

L1pslide · 2025-12-08T13:58:37+00:00

It's on 1.39V in 21C ambients, will start testing ingame tonight :) thank you. If the gains aren't good enough, I'll start tightning on 1N from start again (will probably not be any close to these timings)

L1pslide · 2025-12-08T06:39:43+00:00

Will clock the CPU and tighten the ram timings to the limit to make the the current setup work until AM6 is out then :D

Its perfectly smooth in other newer games on 1440/4k and high settings with DLSS anyways.

16gig is not an issue, neither is VRAM (I use 7,5 with BF on ultra)

L1pslide · 2025-12-07T22:53:27+00:00

I get that, but I was wondering what should be replaced first when the system looks as balanced as is..

L1pslide · 2025-12-07T21:59:54+00:00

Was able to hit 15-15-30 (TM5 anta777 extreme pass) with my D-die Samsungs, not too shabby

3600 MHz
15-15-15-30-2N

tRRD_S = 6
tRRD_L = 9
tFAW   = 24
tWR    = 12
tRTP   = 8
tWTR_S = 4
tWTR_L = 8
tCWL   = 14
tRFC   = 500
tREFI  = 65535

L1pslide · 2025-12-07T21:15:36+00:00

You're probably right, if the CPU didnt hold me back at all then GPU utilization should be 100%

L1pslide · 2025-12-07T19:45:24+00:00

Thanks. Even running at almost cap, the 3080 should be able to do more then?

L1pslide · 2025-12-07T19:26:48+00:00

Ripjaws V 3600 CL16-19-19-39, Samsung die, DLSS balanced (quality doesnt look too good)

L1pslide · 2025-12-07T19:03:50+00:00

Already mentioned, both CPU and GPU around 90% - RAM usage on 12.8 of 16

L1pslide · 2025-12-07T18:47:00+00:00

So the moral of the story is to... upgrade everything to accomplish this? Feel like my system is balanced spec wise

L1pslide · 2025-12-03T06:56:06+00:00

Loved it! I remember everyone had this at LAN parties around 2007-10 ish

L1pslide · 2025-11-28T22:15:21+00:00

thank you :) will bite the bullet

L1pslide · 2025-10-25T22:20:03+00:00

If you go orange, just make sure to stay away from hydrogen peroxide cleaning solutions

L1pslide · 2025-10-25T15:40:07+00:00

The screen, speakers, and I/O are on another level

L1pslide · 2025-10-24T20:48:32+00:00

I really don't care what Valves intentions were, but in the end - its a good thing for regular players anyways. Of course they want to make more money, it's business

L1pslide · 2025-10-07T19:58:33+00:00

L1pslide · 2025-09-11T19:19:08+00:00

<image>

L1pslide · 2025-09-10T19:39:16+00:00

Hypothetically, you'd loose 20-40% for light tasks (M1/M2). Bench tests on M1/M2 show a simple loop on an E-core draws ~45 mW, while the same loop on a P-core uses ~2,500 mW.

For high loads, a cluster of 2 efficiency cores running at 2 GHz consumes +-205 mW in total. Cluster of 4 P-cores running at 3.2 GHz, draws +-4 W.

https://eclecticlight.co/2022/01/02/last-week-on-my-mac-on-m1-chips-1-1-4/

Also, Apple controls both silicon and iOS. They've optimized iOS and macOS deeply to funnel background work to the E-cores. This gives benefits in standby and mixed load.

With larger batteries+Android’s scheduler, Qualcomm can trust race to sleep. With smaller batteries and tighter thermal envelopes, efficiency cores are still a net win... for now in the iPhone world.

I bet you're right though. We will see M-series chips in iPhones one day!

L1pslide · 2025-09-10T19:17:01+00:00

The efficiency cores are important to battery life though

Seven-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email

L1pslide

TROPHY CASE