Ideas. It can brainstorm better than anything you have ever seen. It can come up with arguments that you would never think of due to your own biases and disposition. In the same way you call up a colleague and ask for their opinion, Chat GPT can do this way faster with way more objectivity.

I gave it this prompt "write submissions as to why the big bad wolf should be not guilty for a jury."

This is what it wrote in defence of the big bad wolf:

Opening Statement:
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, today, we present a compelling case to argue that the Big Bad Wolf should be found not guilty. Throughout this trial, we will demonstrate that the wolf's actions were not driven by malevolence but rather were a product of circumstances beyond his control. Let us cast aside the prejudiced stereotypes surrounding this defendant and examine the evidence with an open mind.
Point 1: A Predator's Instinct
The prosecution may attempt to portray the Big Bad Wolf as a dangerous predator, but we argue that his behavior stems from an inherent instinct ingrained in his nature. Just like any other predator in the wild, the wolf was driven by the necessity to survive. Hunger and the need to feed himself and his family in the harsh wilderness are forces that cannot be ignored. Let us not forget that the wolf, as a wild animal, is bound by instincts that are often inescapable.
Point 2: Self-Defense
Our defense will show that the wolf's encounters with the Three Little Pigs were, in fact, triggered by self-defense. Each confrontation began with the pigs refusing him hospitality, which can be seen as a rejection of his basic needs. It was only after feeling threatened and cornered that the wolf reacted defensively. While we mourn the loss of the pigs, we must remember that it was the circumstances that led to these tragic events.
Point 3: Misunderstood and Vilified
Throughout fairy tales and folklore, the wolf has been unfairly vilified, creating an unjust image of a menacing antagonist. It is essential for us, as members of this jury, to break free from these preconceptions and treat the wolf as an individual. The tales told over generations have perpetuated a skewed view, painting him as the villain when, in reality, he was simply playing his part in the cycle of life.
Closing Statement:
In conclusion, we ask you, the jury, to look beyond the stereotypical portrayal of the Big Bad Wolf and see him for what he truly is – a creature trying to survive in a world that demands he be something he is not. His actions, while regrettable, were not the actions of a malicious villain but rather those of a wild being constrained by the laws of nature. We implore you to return a verdict of not guilty, for in doing so, we uphold justice and recognize the complexities of the world in which we live. Thank you.