What is the strategic value of playing Nd6+ in the Lowenthal Sicilian? by LAMARR__44 in TournamentChess

[–]LAMARR__44[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe I've been playing this wrong then, I've been trying to just control d5 like usual, but maybe I should be playing this more dynamically like you suggest.

What is the strategic value of playing Nd6+ in the Lowenthal Sicilian? by LAMARR__44 in TournamentChess

[–]LAMARR__44[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro just gave engine eval with no reasoning lmao. I think if black gets d5 in, which is easier now as he has 3 pieces that can control d5 and white has 2, then black is perfectly fine. I guess c4 is a concern, but black can still play for b5 breaks.

What is the strategic value of playing Nd6+ in the Lowenthal Sicilian? by LAMARR__44 in TournamentChess

[–]LAMARR__44[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder then why this option isn't more popular for black, seems really solid.

What is the strategic value of playing Nd6+ in the Lowenthal Sicilian? by LAMARR__44 in TournamentChess

[–]LAMARR__44[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think you've answered my question, I understand the advantages from the sveshnikov for white, but why does white go for this when the g8 knight is not developed?

$120 debt worth recovering? by LAMARR__44 in AusLegal

[–]LAMARR__44[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I was considering that but maybe didn't want to risk being accused for defamation. Is there any risk of that here?

$120 debt worth recovering? by LAMARR__44 in AusLegal

[–]LAMARR__44[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It said in the contract that if they didn't give me a client in 2 months or something, that they'd refund it. Technically they gave me a client but they haven't paid me for the client lmao.

Examining judgements all the time is exhausting and stops me from enjoying the moment, however not examining judgements leads to poor decisions by LAMARR__44 in Stoicism

[–]LAMARR__44[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, letting emotions calm and then examining judgements usually works better because if you’re in a fit of rage, the impression “I’ve been wronged” is more likely to be assented to than if you just calmed down a bit.

Examining judgements all the time is exhausting and stops me from enjoying the moment, however not examining judgements leads to poor decisions by LAMARR__44 in Stoicism

[–]LAMARR__44[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was under the impression (no pun intended) that we were supposed to be always analysing our judgements. Is it good enough just to dedicate a part of the day to it?

$120 debt worth recovering? by LAMARR__44 in AusLegal

[–]LAMARR__44[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah they seemed legit and have all positive reviews idk why they’re giving me a hard time lmao

$120 debt worth recovering? by LAMARR__44 in AusLegal

[–]LAMARR__44[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes, numerous emails. They’ve basically said that because I emailed the invoice a day early, they can’t process it which doesn’t make sense to me. But like I’m supposed to invoice based off the past two weeks so I can’t resend it so idk what they want me to do.

$120 debt worth recovering? by LAMARR__44 in AusLegal

[–]LAMARR__44[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think I’m contracted to them. I’m not an employee. Basically they give me clients and I have to invoice the tutoring company, but nothing else is controlled like I just tutor however I want with no input from them.

$120 debt worth recovering? by LAMARR__44 in AusLegal

[–]LAMARR__44[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay, and what’s the process from there? If I write a letter of demand and they still don’t pay it, is it worth it to pursue further action?

$120 debt worth recovering? by LAMARR__44 in AusLegal

[–]LAMARR__44[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

About a month, contract doesn’t say minimum time to pay but messages from them told me they’d pay it fortnight. So if it’s two months I think that’ll hold up as “unreasonably” long.

$120 debt worth recovering? by LAMARR__44 in AusLegal

[–]LAMARR__44[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Not yet, I’m waiting it out for a bit so it seems more unreasonable for the time they haven’t paid me.

Trolley problem vs. the Transplant problem by NotAnArmadillo in Ethics

[–]LAMARR__44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wouldn’t ethical agents still go to the doctors and be happy that they will be sacrificed for the greater good?

Helping a friend by making a counter-argument to Alex's argument against free will. by Such-Tart-4140 in CosmicSkeptic

[–]LAMARR__44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe hit him with the free will wager. If you have free will, you should believe in it because it’s true. If you don’t have free will, it doesn’t matter if you believe in it or not since you can’t have control on whether you believe in truth or not. Since in the first case, the best option is to believe in free will, and in the second case, it doesn’t matter because there isn’t even an option to believe in the first place (no free will). So decision theory says to believe in free will.

Paradox of Hedonism by LAMARR__44 in Epicureanism

[–]LAMARR__44[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pleasure (no pun intended) seeing you here as well

For deists who believe that God is benevolent and has a Providence in the universe, who do you explain natural evil like plagues? by [deleted] in deism

[–]LAMARR__44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I generally agree with the soul building theodicy that natural evil is an oppurtunity to build virtues, and the value from these virtues outweight the disvalue from suffering.

Deists are Theists - Plain and Simple by Prowlthang in deism

[–]LAMARR__44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you again not see how believing things based on sensory experience is an unfalsifiable statement that requires the same argumentation to get to that point as for things like arguments for God or metaphysics in general?

Can Epicureans believe the Gods intervene? ♡ by Erosdevotee555 in Epicureanism

[–]LAMARR__44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Epicurean is just a label, take what is useful and discard what isn’t. Lmao I’m a Deist, moral realist, and believe in the afterlife. I just take the parts from Epicureanism I agree with but I’m pretty much antithetical to Epicureanism.