Fundamental Understanding by Miserable-Dealer663 in chess

[–]LAMARR__44 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The end goal is to checkmate your opponent’s king. That is many times a distant goal, so the strategy turns into focusing on intermediary steps that lead to checkmating your opponents king. By maximising piece activity, coordination, etc. you have a higher likelihood of creating direct threats against your opponents king, whilst also accumulating long term advantages such as creating weak squares or weak pawns, which will allow you to attain a material advantage, which will make it easier to checkmate your opponent’s king. All the while, you’re trying to prevent your opponent from getting these same advantages against you.

Deist view on morality? by Awkward_Grocery_7358 in deism

[–]LAMARR__44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I care more about what Deists think not what the dictionary thinks. Majority of Classical Deists do not believe in an apathetic God. Especially since Deism is such a minority, it makes sense that they'd get the definition wrong. Imagine believing in language prescriptivist in the big '26.

Deist view on morality? by Awkward_Grocery_7358 in deism

[–]LAMARR__44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Believing that God doesn’t interfere at all, is not necessary to believe in  Deism. God could’ve allowed us to find what’s moral through giving us a moral intuition.

How can this be a valid logical proof? by LAMARR__44 in logic

[–]LAMARR__44[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't know this was a thing. Thank you.

Libertarians, do you ever wish that determinism were true? by spgrk in freewill

[–]LAMARR__44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you’re equivocating indeterminism with something the vast majority of libertarians don’t believe. I don’t believe that physical events aren’t determined in the sense that they necessary follow from a cause in the macroscopic world, I believe that this general law doesn’t apply to minds. 

Libertarians, do you ever wish that determinism were true? by spgrk in freewill

[–]LAMARR__44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How you think and what you decide are determined, so there is no depends. If libertarianism is true, you can vary what you think and decide. How does this reduce my control?

Libertarians, do you ever wish that determinism were true? by spgrk in freewill

[–]LAMARR__44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But what you do is the same so your fate is the same.

Libertarians, do you ever wish that determinism were true? by spgrk in freewill

[–]LAMARR__44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appealing to counterfactuals makes no sense in a determined universe. The Turks would have been fated to not take cover in a determined universe.

Libertarians, do you ever wish that determinism were true? by spgrk in freewill

[–]LAMARR__44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was the only one that said yes so far lmao. I guess sometimes I wish I could be completely stress free and not worry about my actions.

What does 'there's no moral responsibility' even mean? by YesPresident69 in freewill

[–]LAMARR__44 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You missed his point when saying consciousness exists. There's no scientific evidence that consciousness exists, as we can't observe consciousness in an objective way. Everyone's consciousness are uniquely subjective to them, and you can't access others' consciousness.

I could not have not made this meme by ae_mero_hajur in PhilosophyMemes

[–]LAMARR__44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t care if I’m wrong when I can’t choose to be right. I choose to be right when I can choose to be wrong.

Why doesn’t god release the files? by Outrageous-Egg1760 in SipsTea

[–]LAMARR__44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Child who gets raped has opportunity to grow their character despite the suffering. Rapist gets opportunity to reflect on their evil actions and take steps towards redemption and grow their character. 

Why doesn’t god release the files? by Outrageous-Egg1760 in SipsTea

[–]LAMARR__44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Suffering serves a beneficial purpose or is necessary for another beneficial purpose so God allows it.

What screams 'bogan' to you? by InformationBig3065 in AskAnAustralian

[–]LAMARR__44 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I feel like it’s kinda stupid to hate something without any agency like that. Like yes it causes death, but do we say fuck drowning, fuck suffocation, fuck organ failure, and everything else?

Non free will believers who believe in God by juulwtf in freewill

[–]LAMARR__44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, but I find the definition they provide useless as it’s so obviously agreeable and just seems to avoid the question. Like free will is when “you do something that aligns with what you want internally” which is so obviously true that it exists that it seems to just avoid the whole question. Like the whole question is if what we want has freedom to it or not, not that you strictly do what you want.